Literature DB >> 29683494

The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in head and neck surgery.

Christopher W Noel1, Caitlin McMullen1, Christopher Yao1, Eric Monteiro1,2, David P Goldstein1,3, Antoine Eskander1,4, John R de Almeida1,3,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Fragility Index (FI) is a novel tool for evaluating the robustness of statistically significant findings in a randomized control trial (RCT). It measures the number of events upon which statistical significance depends. We sought to calculate the FI scores for RCTs in the head and neck cancer literature where surgery was a primary intervention. DATA SOURCES: Potential articles were identified in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Cochrane without publication date restrictions. REVIEW
METHODS: Two reviewers independently screened eligible RCTs reporting at least one dichotomous and statistically significant outcome. The data from each trial were extracted and the FI scores were calculated. Associations between trial characteristics and FI were determined.
RESULTS: In total, 27 articles were identified. The median sample size was 67.5 (interquartile range [IQR] = 42-143) and the median number of events per trial was 8 (IQR = 2.25-18.25). The median FI score was 1 (IQR = 0-2.5), meaning that changing one patient from a nonevent to an event in the treatment arm would change the result to a statistically nonsignificant result, or P > .05. The FI score was less than the number of patients lost to follow-up in 71% of cases. The FI score was found to be moderately correlated with P value (ρ = -0.52, P = .007) and with journal impact factor (ρ = 0.49, P = .009) on univariable analysis. On multivariable analysis, only the P value was found to be a predictor of FI score (P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Randomized trials in the head and neck cancer literature where surgery is a primary modality are relatively nonrobust statistically with low FI scores. Laryngoscope, 128:2094-2100, 2018.
© 2018 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fragility Index; Randomized control trials; clinical epidemiology; head and neck cancer; lost to follow-up; research methodology; statistical significance

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29683494     DOI: 10.1002/lary.27183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  4 in total

Review 1.  Statistical Fragility of Surgical Clinical Trials in Orthopaedic Trauma.

Authors:  Lynn Ann Forrester; Kyle L McCormick; Lisa Bonsignore-Opp; Liana J Tedesco; Eric S Baranek; Eugene S Jang; Wakenda K Tyler
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2021-11-19

2.  Fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized clinical trials of surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures: A systematic review.

Authors:  Stephen Craig Morris; Anirudh K Gowd; Avinesh Agarwalla; Wesley P Phipatanakul; Nirav H Amin; Joseph N Liu
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-18

3.  The Fragility Index for Assessing the Robustness of the Statistically Significant Results of Experimental Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Adrienne K Ho
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Statistical Fragility of Surgical and Procedural Clinical Trials in Orthopaedic Oncology.

Authors:  Lynn Ann Forrester; Eugene Jang; Michelle M Lawson; Ana Capi; Wakenda K Tyler
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-06-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.