BACKGROUND:Motor training alone or combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) positioned over the motor cortex (M1) improves motor function in chronic stroke. Currently, understanding of how tDCS influences the process of motor skill learning after stroke is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of tDCS on the stages of motor skill learning and on generalization to untrained motor function. METHODS: In this randomized, sham-controlled, blinded study of 56 mildly impaired chronic stroke patients, tDCS (anode over the ipsilesional M1 and cathode on the contralesional forehead) was applied during 5 days of training on an unfamiliar, challenging fine motor skill task (sequential visual isometric pinch force task). We assessed online and offline learning during the training period and retention over the following 4 months. We additionally assessed the generalization to untrained tasks. RESULTS: With training alone (sham tDCS group), patients acquired a novel motor skill. This skill improved online, remained stable during the offline periods and was largely retained at follow-up. When tDCS was added to training (real tDCS group), motor skill significantly increased relative to sham, mostly in the online stage. Long-term retention was not affected by tDCS. Training effects generalized to untrained tasks, but those performance gains were not enhanced further by tDCS. CONCLUSIONS: Training of an unfamiliar skill task represents a strategy to improve fine motor function in chronic stroke. tDCS augments motor skill learning, but its additive effect is restricted to the trained skill.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Motor training alone or combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) positioned over the motor cortex (M1) improves motor function in chronic stroke. Currently, understanding of how tDCS influences the process of motor skill learning after stroke is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of tDCS on the stages of motor skill learning and on generalization to untrained motor function. METHODS: In this randomized, sham-controlled, blinded study of 56 mildly impaired chronic strokepatients, tDCS (anode over the ipsilesional M1 and cathode on the contralesional forehead) was applied during 5 days of training on an unfamiliar, challenging fine motor skill task (sequential visual isometric pinch force task). We assessed online and offline learning during the training period and retention over the following 4 months. We additionally assessed the generalization to untrained tasks. RESULTS: With training alone (sham tDCS group), patients acquired a novel motor skill. This skill improved online, remained stable during the offline periods and was largely retained at follow-up. When tDCS was added to training (real tDCS group), motor skill significantly increased relative to sham, mostly in the online stage. Long-term retention was not affected by tDCS. Training effects generalized to untrained tasks, but those performance gains were not enhanced further by tDCS. CONCLUSIONS: Training of an unfamiliar skill task represents a strategy to improve fine motor function in chronic stroke. tDCS augments motor skill learning, but its additive effect is restricted to the trained skill.
Entities:
Keywords:
brain injury; motor cortex; neuroplasticity; neurotrophins; noninvasive brain stimulation
Authors: Jost-Julian Rumpf; Sophie Dietrich; Muriel Stoppe; Christopher Fricke; David Weise; Florian Then Bergh; Joseph Classen Journal: J Neurol Date: 2018-08-06 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Lauran Cole; Adrianna Giuffre; Patrick Ciechanski; Helen L Carlson; Ephrem Zewdie; Hsing-Ching Kuo; Adam Kirton Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2018-10-31 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Stephania Palimeris; Yekta Ansari; Anthony Remaud; François Tremblay; Hélène Corriveau; Marie Hélène Boudrias; Marie Hélène Milot Journal: Front Rehabil Sci Date: 2022-08-03
Authors: Lidio Lima de Albuquerque; Milan Pantovic; Mitchell G Clingo; Katherine M Fischer; Sharon Jalene; Merrill R Landers; Zoltan Mari; Brach Poston Journal: Cerebellum Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 3.648
Authors: Carine Nguemeni; György A Homola; Luis Nakchbandi; Mirko Pham; Jens Volkmann; Daniel Zeller Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Bradley R King; Jost-Julian Rumpf; Elvire Verbaanderd; Kirstin F Heise; Nina Dolfen; Stefan Sunaert; Julien Doyon; Joseph Classen; Dante Mantini; Nicolaas A J Puts; Richard A E Edden; Geneviève Albouy; Stephan P Swinnen Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 5.399