Literature DB >> 29682349

Multiple Sclerosis Patients with Markedly Low Intrathecal Antibody Response in Sri Lanka.

S M K Gamage1, I Wijeweera2, S B Adikari1, Katharina Fink3, Jan Hillert4, Anna Fogdell-Hahn4, H M A Sominanda1.   

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a heterogeneous disease which is poorly studied in Asia, where the disease is known to be rare with significant differences in clinical and radiological presentations and intrathecal antibody response. Therefore the objective of this study was to determine clinical presentation, radiological and neurophysiological characteristics, and oligoclonal band status in Sri Lankan MS patients, following careful exclusion of patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and other conditions mimicking multiple sclerosis. Sixty-nine MS patients were recruited to the study adhering to McDonald 2010 criteria. Their clinical presentation, characteristics of central nervous system lesions in magnetic resonance imaging, visual evoked potential (VEP) results, oligoclonal bands (OCB), and AQP4 antibody status were studied. Of 69 MS patients, 54%, 6%, and 1% were relapsing remitting, secondary progressive, and primary progressive, respectively, and 39% were patients with clinically isolated syndrome. The commonest clinical presentations were cerebral motor followed by cerebral sensory and optic neuritis. Majority had typical periventricular and infratentorial lesions in MRI. Though not clinically apparent, bilateral delay of P100 wave latency was present in 52%. OCB positivity was 42% and AQP4 antibody was positive in only one patient. In conclusion, this group of Sri Lankan MS patients shares most of the clinical and radiological features of Caucasian MS patients. However, the OCB positivity is lower in this group, when compared to the Caucasian MS populations.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29682349      PMCID: PMC5851020          DOI: 10.1155/2018/5342936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler Int        ISSN: 2090-2654


1. Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is heterogeneous in terms of disease prevalence, clinical and paraclinical characteristics in different regions, and ethnicities in the world [1-4]. Even though the precise reasons for this heterogeneity have not been identified yet, geographical and genetic influences have long been hypothesized as causes [5]. There is higher prevalence of MS in countries away from equator than in regions close to equator. In addition there is very high prevalence of MS in ethnic groups such as Sardinians and Parsis, while there is low prevalence among Samis, Turkman, Uzbeks, native Siberians, and New Zealand Maoris [6]. There are MS hot spots in Florida, Canada, and Norway, reinforcing the fact that geographic factors may have directly influenced occurrence of MS [6, 7]. This is probably due to the geographic isolation of populations causing selection of candidate genes responsible for MS. This aspect may be relevant to Sri Lanka which is a geographically isolated island in which the unique geography can influence its confined population genetics. However, there are anthropological evidence which suggests that Sri Lanka has a mixed genetic composition due to the significant genetic flow from its neighboring country India [8]. Nevertheless, it was recently proved that Sri Lankans are different to Caucasians in clinical pathologies, disease courses, outcomes, and treatment responses for many diseases [9]. Multiple sclerosis is poorly studied in Sri Lanka. The exact prevalence of MS is not studied up to now. However, there is handful of studies on MS in the South Asian region, including Sri Lanka [10, 11]. Most of them have reported markedly low disease prevalence and inconsistent accounts on the clinical picture of MS. Most importantly, the paraclinical characteristics such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, oligoclonal band (OCB) status, and neurophysiological investigation results have not been studied adequately in this region of the world. This study is the first comprehensive descriptive study on the largest sample of MS patients in Sri Lanka, especially with the OCB status.

2. Methods

2.1. Aim

Based on the hypothesis that Sri Lankan MS patients are different to Caucasian patients, the objective of this study was to characterize MS in Sri Lanka using clinical and paraclinical findings, following meticulous exclusion of all cases of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and other conditions mimicking MS.

2.2. Patients, Study Design, and Setting

This is a cross-sectional descriptive study. Ethical approval was granted by the Faculty of Medicine, Peradeniya (2012/EC/14). Patients referred from 5 main referral hospitals, representing 8 out of 9 provinces of Sri Lanka, during the period of March 2012 to December 2015 were included in the study with informed written consent. Patients were diagnosed by consultant neurologists using clinical, MRI, and visual evoked potential (VEP) parameters. The following were the inclusion and exclusion criteria for patient recruitment of the study. Inclusion Criteria. The inclusion criteria are as follows: patients fulfilling McDonald 2010 criteria (both newly diagnosed patients and patients presenting with relapses); availability of at least one MRI with T1W/T2W/FLAIR pulse sequence images; availability of at least one MRI reported by consultant radiologist; patients with informed written consent for lumbar puncture and availability of appropriate samples of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum for OCB and aquaporin 4 antibody (AQP4) assays. Exclusion Criteria. The exclusion criteria are as follows: NMOSDs diagnosed according to revised Wingerchuk criteria 2015 following AQP4 antibody analysis; patients having recurrent myelitis with longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesions that contiguously extend over 3 vertebral segments; patients with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), vasculitis, cerebrovascular accidents, and other conditions mimicking MS; patients with disease duration less than 12 months; patients with disease onset earlier than 12 years and later than 60 years; patients with diagnosed and uncontrolled psychiatric disorders and prominent grey matter disorders such as dementia and seizures.

2.3. Data Retrieval and Collection

The clinical and investigation results were initially collected locally at the referring hospitals in a retrospective manner from the bed head records and clinical records of all patients. Whenever there was a lack of availability of data in patients' records, the principle investigator interviewed and examined patients individually to obtain more detailed information. These details were documented in a structured data collection sheet until further analysis. All the MRIs obtained at the onset of disease and up to a maximum of 5 relapses were considered, if they fulfilled inclusion criteria. Details in MRI reports issued by Consultant Radiologists and data in the most recent CSF and VEP reports were extracted and stored in the structured data collection sheet.

2.4. Biological Samples

Paired serum and CSF samples from each patient were obtained for OCB and AQP4 antibody assays at referring hospitals, during diagnostic assessment in CIS patients and during a relapse in already diagnosed MS patients. All samples were transported to the Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, at a temperature of 2–8°C, within 24 hours of collection. These samples were aliquoted and stored at −45°C and the final analysis was performed within three months of sample acquisition in the Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya.

2.5. MRI Brain and Spinal Cord

All MRI reports of brain and spinal cord, obtained during the onset of disease and up to a maximum of 5 relapses, were considered, only if they had been reported by the Consultant Radiologists. Data regarding the location, size, lesion number, and T1, T2, FLAIR intensities, and contrast enhancements and presence and absence of new lesions were extracted and recorded in the data collection sheet until further analysis.

2.6. Laboratory Analyses: Isoelectric Focusing and Immunoblotting (IEF and IB) for OCB Detection in CSF and Serum

A validated IEF and immunoblotting protocol for detection of OCB, adopted in Karolinska Institutet Sweden [13], was established in the immunology laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya. Twenty OCB positive and negative CSF and serum control samples of western MS patients were obtained from Karolinska Institutet. These samples were used as positive and negative controls during OCB analysis in our laboratory.

2.7. ELISA for AQP4 Antibody Detection

Serum AQP4 antibody was tested in all patients using the Aquaporin-4 Ab version 2 autoantibody kit (RSR limited, Cardiff, UK), according to manufacturer's protocol.

2.8. Data and Statistical Analysis

Data retrieved from the data collection sheets were entered into Microsoft Excel and were analyzed using Graph Pad Prism software (Graph Pad Software, La Jolla California USA, https://www.graphpad.com). Since no data from the control Caucasian MS group were available, no formal statistical comparison could be conducted between Sri Lankan and Caucasian MS patients. Descriptive statistics was applied for the Sri Lankan MS group and the comparison with Caucasian MS was based on the data from literature.

3. Results

3.1. Study Population and Definitions

Following application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 69 MS patients were included in the study (Figure 1). Of them, 54%, 6%, 1%, and 39% were categorized as relapsing remitting (RRMS), secondary progressive (SPMS), primary progressive (PPMS), and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), respectively. The demographic characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Figure 1

Sample selection. 2015 NMOSD criteria defined by Wingerchuk et al. [12].

Table 1

Demographic characteristics.

Clinical characteristicsMS n (%)
Total 69
Male : female ratio1 : 1.7
Mean age (range) years34 (16–58)
Mean age at onset (range) years32 (16–57)
Mean disease duration (range) years3 (1–18)
Clinical subtypes (%)
 RRMS37 (54)
 SPMS4 (6)
 PPMS1 (1)
 CIS27 (39)
Attack frequency (per year ± SD)1.2 ± 0.5
Mean EDSS (range)2.5 (0–8)
Upgraded Global MSSS5.7 ± 2.6
Global ARMSSS5.3 ± 2.9
History of travel to high MS prevalent country2 (3)
Family history of MS0

MS: multiple sclerosis; RRMS: relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis; SPMS: secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; PPMS: primary progressive multiple sclerosis; CIS: clinically isolated syndrome; SD: standard deviation; EDSS: Kurtzke expanded disability status scale; MSSS: multiple sclerosis severity score; ARMSSS: age related multiple sclerosis severity score.

3.2. Clinical Characteristics

The commonest clinical presentation was cerebral motor manifestations (50%) followed by cerebral sensory (45%) and optic neuritis (45%). Cerebellar and brain stem manifestations were present in only 32% and 29%, respectively. Spinal cord sensory and motor manifestations were observed in 19% of patients. Autonomic manifestations were observed in 8% while fatigue was observed in 48% (Table 2).
Table 2

Clinical characteristics.

Clinical characteristicsMSn (%)
Total 69 (100)
Optic neuritis
Total 31 (45)
 Monocular22 (32)
 Binocular9 (13)
 Impaired visual acuity31 (45)
 Complete loss of light perception0
 Periorbital pain with eye movements17 (25)
Internuclear ophthalmoplegia 17 (25)
Cerebral sensory
Total 31 (45)
 Regional distribution
  Right upper limb19 (27)
  Left upper limb13 (19)
  Right lower limb18 (27)
  Left lower limb17 (24)
 Trunk, right and left7 (10)
 Modalities
  Paraesthesia22 (32)
  Anaesthesia27 (39)
  Pain18 (26)
Cerebral motor
Total 34 (50)
 Regional distribution
  Right upper limb21 (31)
  Left upper limb11 (16)
  Right lower limb29 (42)
  Left lower limb23 (25)
Cerebellar
Total 22 (32)
 Ataxia22 (32)
 Dysarthria5 (8)
 Tremor17 (24)
 Past pointing18 (26)
 Vertigo18 (26)
 Nystagmus12 (18)
Brain stem/cranial nerves 20 (29)
Spinal cord
Total 13 (19)
 Both sensory and motor08 (12)
 Sensory only03 (4)
 Motor only02 (3)
Autonomic
Total 5 (8)
 Urinary incontinence4 (6)
 Faecal incontinence3 (5)
Transverse myelitis 1 (1)
Hearing loss 3 (5)
Lower motor facial nerve palsy 5 (8)
Fatigue 33 (48)
Ancillary symptoms 27 (39)
 Lhermitte's sign10 (14)

All the symptoms were supported by clinical examination findings in all the attacks (up to a maximum of 5 attacks were included).

Out of the total number of relapses, the cerebral sensory relapses were the highest compared to the cerebral motor, cerebellar, optic neuritis, or autonomic relapses. Out of all clinical manifestations, cerebral sensory manifestations predominated during the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd relapses followed by optic neuritis. Thus, even though cerebral motor manifestations were the most common initial clinical presentation, it was the 3rd frequent clinical feature during relapses (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Frequency of different clinical manifestations in the study group. TM: transverse myelitis; ON: optic neuritis.

3.3. Psychosocial Manifestations

Depression secondary to MS was diagnosed in 16%. Suicidal thoughts were present in 16% of the patients with MS though there were no suicidal attempts reported (Table 3).
Table 3

Psychosocial features.

Psychosocial features (%)Total MS  (n = 69) n  (%)
Psychological status
 Diagnosed depression11 (16)
 Low mood38 (56)
 Lack of self-esteem25 (37)
 Suicidal thoughts11 (16)
 Suicidal attempts0
Sexual problems
 Impotence5 (8)
 Reduced libido13 (19)
Divorced due to disease2 (3)
Marital problems related to sexual activities20 (30)
Studies affected3 (5)
Lost job due to disability16 (24)
Self-employed3 (5)

3.4. MRI Features

All patients demonstrated CNS lesions, which are hyperintense in T2W and FLAIR images and hypointense in T1W images. The periventricular lesions were perpendicular to the ventricular surfaces (Figure 3) and were present in 80% of patients (Table 4). Juxtacortical lesions were seen in 69%. Infratentorial and corpus callosal lesions were present in 74% and 49%, respectively. Spinal cord and cervical cord lesions were patchy and peripherally located (Figure 4).
Figure 3

FLAIR hyperintense and T1W hypointense lesions in cerebrum of an MS patient. (a) MRIs of McDonald criteria fulfilling MS patient showing sections of cerebrum with hyperintense lesions in FLAIR sequence; (a)(A) oval and round shaped subcortical lesions indicated by “X”; (a)(B), (a)(C), and (a)(D) oval periventricular lesions located perpendicular to the ventricular surface indicated by “Y” (Dawson's fingers appearance). (b) MRIs of a patient showing sections of cerebrum with hypointense lesions in T1W sequence; (b)(A) hypointense lesions in subcortical region indicated by “Z”; (b)(B), (b)(C), and (b)(D) hypointense lesions in periventricular regions indicated by “Z”.

Table 4

Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics.

Number of MRIs analyzed (%)
 Brain143 (207)
 Spinal cord (full)27 (39)
 Cervical cord only03 (4)
Types of MRI lesions (%)
 Hyperintense lesions in T2W and FLAIR69 (100)
 Hypointense lesions in T1W69 (100)
 Number of brain lesions: average (range)6 (3–12)
Locations of lesions (%)
 Periventricular55 (80)
 Juxtacortical48 (69)
 Infratentorial51 (74)
 Spinal cord(a)11 (16)
 Cervical cord (b)12 (17)
 Corpus callosum34 (49)
 Optic nerve18 (26)

MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; T1W: T1 weighted pulse sequence; T2W: T2 weighted pulse sequence; (a) lesions of the spinal cord +/− involvement of cervical cord; (b) lesions confined to cervical cord. Patients with T2W hyperintense spinal cord lesions which are centrally located and extend more than 3 spinal segments were excluded.

Figure 4

T2W hyperintense and T1W hypointense lesions in spinal cord of an MS patient. (a) MRIs showing three sagittal sections of spinal cord with patchy, hyperintense lesions in T2W sequence indicated in M. (b) MRIs showing three sagittal sections of spinal cord with hypointensities in T2W sequence. (c) MRIs of the same patient showing two transverse sections of spinal cord with peripherally located hyperintense lesion in T2W sequence.

3.5. Clinical Optic Neuritis (ON) and VEP Assessment

Clinically monocular optic neuritis was commoner than binocular optic neuritis in this group of MS patients. VEP reports were available in 80 eyes of 40 MS patients. Of those, majority showed bilateral P100 wave latency delay (Table 5). Most importantly, out of the 18 clinically ON negative eyes, 6 had P100 wave latency delay reflecting existence of subclinical optic nerve demyelination.
Table 5

Optic neuritis features and P100 response in VEP.

Number of eyes (%)

Clinical features of optic neuritis present 31 (45)
 Monocular22 (32)
 Binocular9 (13)
Availability of VEP reports 40 (58)
P100 response of VEP
 Bilateral delay33 (48)
 Unilateral delay6 (3)
 Bilaterally normal1 (1)
 Right eye latency (ms)110.60 (±34.6)
 Right eye amplitude (µV)8.87 (±4.2)
 Left eye latency (ms)108.10 (±34.0)
 Left eye amplitude (µV)8.76 (±3.98)

VEP: visual evoked potential.

3.6. CSF Findings

CSF full reports were available in 80% of the patients. Mean cell count was 26 (±12). Oligoclonal bands were positive in 42% of the group (Table 6).
Table 6

Cerebrospinal fluid.

CSF cell count (per  mm3)26 (±12)
Lymphocytes (%)92 (±8.0)
Protein (mg/dl)60.4 (±19.2)
Oligoclonal bands positivity29 (42%)
AQP4 positivity1 (1%)

CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; MS: multiple sclerosis; mm3: cubic millimetre; mg/dl: milligram per deciliter. Values are presented as mean ± SD.

3.7. AQP4 Antibody Status

Of all MS patients (n = 69), 99% were negative for AQP4 antibodies and only one patient was positive for AQP4 antibodies (Table 6).

4. Discussion

This is the first study done on a large group of MS patients of a country situated in a region with low prevalence of MS [14]. This group of Sri Lankan MS patients shows considerable overlapping with Caucasian MS patients clinically and radiologically, but there is a striking difference with respect to OCB status.

4.1. Demographics and Clinical Characteristics

This group showed a female preponderance with a male to female ratio of 1 : 1.7 similar to studies done in Europe, Asia, and elsewhere in the world [15-19]. In addition, mean age at disease onset was also comparable with the studies in Asia as well as in Caucasian populations [20]. Clinical subtype of the majority of this group was RRMS and there were a considerable number of CIS cases. However, the percentages of SPMS and PPMS cases were less when compared to similar studies [21, 22]. A probable reason could be inclusion of patients at an earlier stage of the disease. The relapse frequency was higher than the Caucasian and Japanese MS patients reflecting a higher disease activity [23]. This may be explained by the shorter duration of disease of this study group, since disease activity is known to be high during the initial stage of the disease [24]. However, the mean EDSS of this cohort is 2.5, which is a relatively mild disability compared to most of the Japanese studies [25] indicating a lower neurological deficit due to a lesser disease progression. Furthermore, MSSS (multiple sclerosis severity score) and Global ARMSSS (age related multiple sclerosis severity score) were 5.7 and 5.3, respectively, in the present study group [26]. These values are comparable, yet lower than those of the Global MSSS and Global ARMSSS matrix data (6.37 and 5.93, resp.), which have been developed using data on European MS patients [26]. The commonest initial clinical presentation was cerebral motor manifestations followed by cerebral sensory features and optic neuritis (Table 2). A similar pattern has been observed in a previous study done on Sri Lankan MS and in other Asian studies [10, 27]. On the contrary, studies on Caucasian MS patients have demonstrated that sensory presentations predominate over motor manifestations [4, 28]. However, as illustrated in Figure 2, majority of clinical attacks of these MS patients consisted of sensory manifestations, followed by optic neuritis and motor manifestations which is on par with Caucasian MS [28]. Patients are more likely to consult a neurologist following the first motor symptoms rather than sensory symptoms, since sensory manifestations are not as disabling as motor. Therefore the reasons for most initial presentations to be motor but majority of relapses to be sensory may be that the patients might have ignored the initial sensory symptoms or may be the initial sensory symptoms had not been recognized as a result of underlying demyelinating disease. Bilateral severe optic neuritis is commonly considered as a main clinical presentation of NMO as opposed to the unilateral optic neuritis which is a common presentation in early MS [12] and this study reports a similar pattern. Furthermore, none of the patients had complete loss of light perception, indicating a less severe form of demyelination in the optic pathway. Internuclear ophthalmoplegia (INO) is a common occurrence in MS and it is reported to be present in up to 30% of MS patients [29]. The present study has demonstrated a similar frequency. Lhermitte's sign, a pathognomonic clinical feature in western MS [28], was as low as 19% in Sri Lankan “MSpatients. In addition, a lower occurrence of cerebellar, brainstem/cranial nerve palsies and autonomic manifestations were observed when compared with the studies on Caucasian MS patients [30]. Depression and fatigability appear to be common in Sri Lankan MS patients as reported elsewhere in the world [31, 32]. Suicidal thoughts, loss of libido, divorce related to the disease, and loss of employment were also found to be substantially high among MS patients indicating a negative impact on the psychosocial aspects of these patients. There was no positive family history of MS reported in any of the patients in this study reflecting the sporadic nature of the disease in Asia, in contrast to the familial nature of MS in temperate countries [33, 34].

4.2. Imaging and Neurophysiological Characteristics

All of the MS patients had round or oval shaped lesions (Figures 3 and 4) scattered in neuroanatomical locations typical for MS [30] (Table 4). Of these, periventricular lesions were perpendicular to ventricular surface indicating “Dawson finger appearance” which is a typical finding in Caucasian MS patients [35] (Figure 3). Occurrence of infratentorial lesions in MRI is reported to be very common in Caucasian MS patients when compared to Asian MS patients [36]. However in the present study, the majority had infratentorial lesions typical for MS indicating their close resemblance to Caucasian MS patients. Similarly, patchy and peripherally located spinal cord lesions, which do not contiguously extend more than 3 vertebral segments, are considered to be typical of conventional Caucasian type MS and it is an important MRI finding for the differentiation of MS from NMOSDs [12]. Such spinal cord lesions (including cervical cord lesions) were found in a considerable number of patients in the present study group. Therefore this group of Sri Lankan MS patients resembles the Caucasian type of MS radiologically. Monocular optic neuritis (ON) is very common among Sri Lankan MS patients, confirmed by P100 wave latency delay. However, there were a large number of eyes without clinical ON but with P100 wave latency delay indicating subclinical evidence of optic nerve demyelination. Similar findings have been reported in literature on Caucasian MS, substantiating the clinical and MRI resemblance of Sri Lankan MS group to those of Caucasian MS [37].

4.3. Intrathecal Cellular and Antibody Response

Lower OCB positivity (42%) was observed in this group of Sri Lankan MS patients when compared to that of Caucasian MS patients (95–98%) [38]. However this value is similar to the available Japanese and Korean studies performed using the same standard method [17, 25]. None of the Asian studies have reported OCB positivities as high as 90% up to now. Therefore the reason for low OCB positivity in this region of the world can be a difference in intrathecal antibody response of the Asian MS patients. The clinical features of Asian and Caucasian MS patients seem to overlap, but due to the differences in intrathecal antibody responses the OCB positivity may vary in different populations. This may be attributed to differences in the B cell or humorally mediated immunopathogenesis of MS in the Asian patients. Further research on this possibility is necessary to speculate the cause for the lower OCB positivity among Sri Lankan as well as other Asian MS patients. Alternatively, the CIS patients in the present study who are at the initial stage of their disease may have a possibility of seroconversion to OCB positivity in later course of the disease [39]. A Swedish study done on 1505 MS patients concluded that OCB negative subpopulation was clinically indistinguishable from the OCB positive group, since they shared most of the clinical features. OCB positive MS patients' genetic makeup has been found to be consisting of more HLA-DRB1∗15 genotype while that of OCB negative patients has been associated more with HLA-DRB1∗04 genotype [13]. Therefore, as a future direction, it is important to explore the HLA associations of the OCB positive and negative subgroups in Sri Lanka. There was one patient repeatedly positive for AQP4 in this group and he had unilateral optic neuritis, cerebral sensory manifestations, typical MS brain, and cervical spinal cord lesions in MRI with contrast enhancement. Despite being positive for AQP4 he did not fulfill criteria for NMOSDs reflecting a borderline or atypical presentation of MS rather than NMO. Current study had the limitation of small sample size. Nevertheless, considering the expected low prevalence of MS in the South Asia and very strict recruitment criteria of the present study, we have studied a more valid sample of MS as opposed to most of the other South Asian studies. In conclusion, this is the first study done in Sri Lanka to meticulously characterize multiple sclerosis both clinically and paraclinically taking into consideration both OCBs and AQP4 antibody status. This group of Sri Lankan MS patients show similarities to typical Caucasian MS patients clinically and paraclinically. Nevertheless, their OCB positivity is lower compared to Caucasian MS populations.
  34 in total

Review 1.  Multiple sclerosis in the Japanese population.

Authors:  Jun-ichi Kira
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 44.182

2.  Clinical characteristics of African Americans vs Caucasian Americans with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  B A C Cree; O Khan; D Bourdette; D S Goodin; J A Cohen; R A Marrie; D Glidden; B Weinstock-Guttman; D Reich; N Patterson; J L Haines; M Pericak-Vance; C DeLoa; J R Oksenberg; S L Hauser
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Prevalence of cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal IgG bands in Greek patients with clinically isolated syndrome and multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  E Andreadou; S Chatzipanagiotou; V C Constantinides; A Rombos; E Stamboulis; C Nicolaou
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 1.876

4.  Clinical and MRI study of brain stem and cerebellar involvement in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  I Nakashima; K Fujihara; N Okita; S Takase; Y Itoyama
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Symptomatic fatigue in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J E Freal; G H Kraft; J K Coryell
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Ethnicity-dependent association of HLA DRB1-DQA1-DQB1 alleles in Brazilian multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  S V Alves-Leon; R Papais-Alvarenga; M Magalhães; M Alvarenga; L C S Thuler; O Fernández y Fernandez
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.209

7.  International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Dean M Wingerchuk; Brenda Banwell; Jeffrey L Bennett; Philippe Cabre; William Carroll; Tanuja Chitnis; Jérôme de Seze; Kazuo Fujihara; Benjamin Greenberg; Anu Jacob; Sven Jarius; Marco Lana-Peixoto; Michael Levy; Jack H Simon; Silvia Tenembaum; Anthony L Traboulsee; Patrick Waters; Kay E Wellik; Brian G Weinshenker
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Age Related Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score: Disability ranked by age.

Authors:  Ali Manouchehrinia; Helga Westerlind; Elaine Kingwell; Feng Zhu; Robert Carruthers; Ryan Ramanujam; Maria Ban; Anna Glaser; Stephen Sawcer; Helen Tremlett; Jan Hillert
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 6.312

9.  Geographical variations in sex ratio trends over time in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Maria Trojano; Guglielmo Lucchese; Giusi Graziano; Bruce V Taylor; Steve Simpson; Vito Lepore; Francois Grand'maison; Pierre Duquette; Guillermo Izquierdo; Pierre Grammond; Maria Pia Amato; Roberto Bergamaschi; Giorgio Giuliani; Cavit Boz; Raymond Hupperts; Vincent Van Pesch; Jeannette Lechner-Scott; Edgardo Cristiano; Marcela Fiol; Celia Oreja-Guevara; Maria Laura Saladino; Freek Verheul; Mark Slee; Damiano Paolicelli; Carla Tortorella; Mariangela D'Onghia; Pietro Iaffaldano; Vita Direnzo; Helmut Butzkueven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sunshine, Sea, and Season of Birth: MS Incidence in Wales.

Authors:  Lloyd D Balbuena; Rod M Middleton; Katie Tuite-Dalton; Theodora Pouliou; Kate Elizabeth Williams; Gareth J Noble
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Applicability of McDonald 2010 and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis (MAGNIMS) 2016 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis in Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Sujani Madhurika Kodagoda Gamage; Indunil Wijeweera; Priyangi Wijesinghe; Sanjaya Bandara Adikari; Katharina Fink; Herath Mudiyanselage Ajith Sominanda
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.077

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.