| Literature DB >> 29681930 |
Asami Fujitani1,2, Tsuyoshi Sogo3, Ayano Inui3, Kiyoshi Kawakubo4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and effect of dietary habits on functional constipation in preschool and early elementary school children in Japan. STUDYEntities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29681930 PMCID: PMC5848140 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3108021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract ISSN: 1687-6121 Impact factor: 2.260
Rome III criteria for functional constipation.
| <4 years | ≥4 years |
|---|---|
| Must include at least 2 items for 1 month | Must include 2 or more items for at least 2 months before diagnosis |
| (1) Two or fewer defecations per week | (1) Two or fewer defecations in the toilet per week |
| (2) At least 1 episode per week of incontinence after the acquisition of toileting skills | (2) At least 1 episode of fecal incontinence per week |
| (3) History of excessive stool retention | (3) History of retentive posturing or excessive volitional stool retention |
| (4) History of painful or hard bowel movements | (4) History of painful or hard bowel movements |
| (5) Presence of a large fecal mass in the rectum | (5) Presence of a large fecal mass in the rectum |
| (6) History of large-diameter stools that may obstruct the toilet | (6) History of large-diameter stools that may obstruct the toilet |
Characteristics of the subjects.
| FC | Non-FC |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ANCOVA | ||
| Boys : girls | 367 : 351 | 1439 : 1438 | 0.617 | ||
|
| |||||
| Mean age (years) | All | 6.5 ± 1.3 | 6.4 ± 1.3 | 0.112 | |
| Boys | 6.4 ± 1.4 | 6.4 ± 1.3 | 0.912 | ||
| Girls | 6.6 ± 1.3 | 6.5 ± 1.3 | 0.015 | ||
|
| |||||
| Mean height (cm) | All | 118.6 ± 10.0 | 118.5 ± 9.3 | 0.387 | 0.479 |
| Boys | 118.6 ± 10.0 | 118.5 ± 9.3 | 0.863 | 0.362 | |
| Girls | 118.3 ± 8.8 | 117.7 ± 8.8 | 0.287 | 0.315 | |
|
| |||||
| Mean weight (kg) | All | 22.2 ± 4.9 | 21.8 ± 4.5 | 0.047 | 0.218 |
| Boys | 22.5 ± 5.4 | 22.2 ± 4.6 | 0.149 | 0.133 | |
| Girls | 21.9 ± 4.3 | 21.6 ± 4.4 | 0.238 | 0.467 | |
|
| |||||
| Mean BMI (kg/m2) | All | 15.7 ± 1.9 | 15.5 ± 1.9 | 0.049 | 0.067 |
| Boys | 15.8 ± 2.1 | 15.6 ± 1.9 | 0.033 | 0.193 | |
| Girls | 15.5 ± 1.8 | 15.5 ± 1.9 | 0.554 | 0.588 | |
|
| |||||
| Mean height | All | −0.15 ± 1.14 | −0.08 ± 1.06 | 0.148 | 0.171 |
| Boys | −0.07 ± 1.16 | −0.04 ± 1.09 | 0.722 | 0.296 | |
| Girls | −0.22 ± 1.12 | −0.11 ± 1.02 | 0.078 | 0.454 | |
|
| |||||
| Mean weight | All | −0.22 ± 1.03 | −0.22 ± 0.99 | 0.911 | 0.806 |
| Boys | −0.15 ± 1.16 | −0.26 ± 1.22 | 0.122 | 0.384 | |
| Girls | −0.29 ± 1.01 | −0.25 ± 0.96 | 0.592 | 0.544 | |
|
| |||||
| Mean BMI percentile | All | 45.47 ± 28.67 | 43.23 ± 28.11 | 0.057 | 0.042 |
| Boys | 46.81 ± 29.42 | 43.91 ± 28.67 | 0.085 | 0.338 | |
| Girls | 44.06 ± 27.84 | 42.54 ± 27.53 | 0.355 | 0.290 | |
Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation. ANCOVA: analysis with age as a covariate (Bonferroni).
Relationship between functional constipation and consumption of energy and nutrients.
| Mean amount of intake per day | Unit | FC | Non-FC |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ANCOVA | ||||
|
| |||||
| Total meal weight | g | 1606.3 ± 466.9 | 1616.2 ± 457.9 | 0.606 | |
| Total calories | kcal | 1421.8 ± 417.0 | 1395.2 ± 385.6 | 0.122 | 0.128 |
| Water content per meal | g | 1298.2 ± 393.7 | 1312.5 ± 390.8 | 0.380 | 0.378 |
| Protein | g | 48.4 ± 14.0 | 48.1 ± 13.5 | 0.631 | 0.666 |
| Fat | g | 45.9 ± 13.6 | 44.4 ± 12.9 | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Carbohydrates | g | 198.9 ± 70.2 | 196.2 ± 65.0 | 0.346 | 0.376 |
| Calcium | mg | 529.6 ± 204.4 | 519.5 ± 198.1 | 0.272 | 0.269 |
| Magnesium | mg | 176.6 ± 54.3 | 177.3 ± 52.6 | 0.779 | 0.736 |
| Phosphorous | mg | 808.9 ± 257.2 | 801.7 ± 248.5 | 0.490 | 0.513 |
| Soluble dietary fibre | g | 1.88 ± 0.7 | 1.92 ± 0.7 | 0.170 | 0.164 |
| Insoluble dietary fibre | g | 5.97 ± 2.0 | 6.13 ± 2.0 | 0.062 | 0.057 |
| Total dietary fibre | g | 8.02 ± 2.8 | 8.22 ± 2.8 | 0.074 | 0.069 |
| NaCl | g | 9.22 ± 2.4 | 9.27 ± 2.4 | 0.614 | 0.605 |
| Juice | g | 94.2 ± 127.5 | 80.9 ± 98.8 | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Water including tea | g | 301.6 ± 168.0 | 318.2 ± 168.4 | 0.018 | 0.015 |
|
| |||||
| Total meal weight | g/100 kcal | 114.7 ± 20.6 | 117.3 ± 21.0 | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Water content per meal | g/100 kcal | 93.0 ± 20.4 | 95.5 ± 20.9 | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Protein | g/100 kcal | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 0.090 | 0.111 |
| Fat | g/100 kcal | 3.3 ± 0.6 | 3.2 ± 0.6 | 0.019 | 0.019 |
| Carbohydrate | g/100 kcal | 13.9 ± 1.6 | 14.0 ± 1.5 | 0.127 | 0.123 |
| Calcium | mg/100 kcal | 37.5 ± 10.9 | 37.3 ± 10.3 | 0.793 | 0.720 |
| Magnesium | mg/100 kcal | 12.5 ± 2.0 | 12.8 ± 2.0 | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Phosphorous | mg/100 kcal | 57.3 ± 10.6 | 57.7 ± 9.9 | 0.346 | 0.395 |
| Soluble dietary fibre | mg/100 kcal | 134.0 ± 3.6 | 138.7 ± 3.7 | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insoluble dietary fibre | mg/100 kcal | 424.5 ± 9.1 | 442.3 ± 9.9 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Total dietary fibre/day | mg/100 kcal | 570.3 ± 128.8 | 593.5 ± 138.4 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| NaCl | mg/100 kcal | 667.00 ± 137.9 | 680.7 ± 136.2 | 0.016 | 0.023 |
ANCOVA: analysis with age as a covariate (Bonferroni). Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation.
Binomial logistic regression analysis of functional constipation.
| Factor | Logistic regression coefficient | Standard error |
| Odd ratio (95% confidence interval) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.055 | 0.032 | 0.089 | 10.057 (0.992–1.126) |
| BMI percentile | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.063 | 1.003 (1.000–1.006) |
| Juice | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.008 | 1.001 (1.000–1.002) |
| Fat/100 kcal | 0.196 | 0.076 | 0.010 | 1.216 (1.0476–1.412) |
| Total dietary fibre/day/100 kcal | 0.001 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.999 (0.998–1.000) |
Frequency of constipation symptoms including Rome III criteria.
| All | FC | Non-FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| ≤2 defecations per week | 162 (4.6) | 111 (15.9) | 51 (1.8) |
| Fecal incontinence | 488 (13.7) | 330 (46.3) | 158 (5.5) |
| History of excessive stool retention | 785 (23.5) | 495 (73.6) | 290 (10.9) |
| History of painful bowel movements | 774 (22.7) | 424 (61.5) | 350 (12.8) |
| History of hard bowel movements | 675 (19.0) | 310 (43.6) | 365 (12.7) |
| History of large-diameter stools that obstruct the toilet | 206 (5.8) | 149 (21.0) | 57 (2.0) |