Literature DB >> 29680881

Baricitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in United States and Rest of World: A Subset Analysis.

Alvin F Wells1, Maria Greenwald2, John D Bradley3, Jahangir Alam3, Vipin Arora3, Cynthia E Kartman4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This article evaluates the efficacy and safety of baricitinib 4 mg versus placebo in United States including Puerto Rico (US) and rest of the world (ROW) subpopulations using data pooled from RA-BEAM and RA-BUILD, which enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe adult-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: In RA-BEAM, patients with an inadequate response (IR) to methotrexate, at least one X-ray erosion, and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) ≥ 6 mg/L were randomized to placebo or orally administered baricitinib 4 mg daily or subcutaneously administered adalimumab 40 mg every other week. In RA-BUILD, patients with an IR to at least one conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) and with hsCRP ≥ 3.6 mg/L were randomized to placebo or baricitinib 2 or 4 mg daily. Patients in both trials were biologic naive. In this post hoc analysis, data from both studies were pooled (714 baricitinib 4 mg-treated, 716 placebo-treated patients).
RESULTS: Overall, 188 US and 1242 ROW patients were included. Subgroups differed in baseline characteristics including race, weight, age, time since RA diagnosis, current corticosteroid use, and previous csDMARD use. At weeks 12 and 24, baricitinib-treated patients had larger responses compared to placebo-treated patients for multiple efficacy outcomes: American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 response, low disease activity, remission, Disease Activity Score 28-C-reactive protein, and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index. Overall, similar efficacy was observed in US and ROW subgroups with no notable safety differences between subgroups at weeks 12 or 24.
CONCLUSION: Baricitinib 4 mg was efficacious compared to placebo in US and ROW subpopulations. Safety was similar between subgroups. FUNDING: Eli Lilly & Company and Incyte Corporation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT01721057; NCT01710358.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baricitinib; Clinical Trial; Rheumatoid Arthritis; United States

Year:  2018        PMID: 29680881      PMCID: PMC5935623          DOI: 10.1007/s40744-018-0110-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Ther        ISSN: 2198-6576


  25 in total

Review 1.  Current understanding of rheumatoid arthritis therapy.

Authors:  Inés Colmegna; Brent R Ohata; Henri A Menard
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Fat Mass Lowers the Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Blockers in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis.

Authors:  Sebastián E Ibáñez Vodnizza; Michael T Nurmohamed; Ingrid M Visman; J Christiaan van Denderen; Willem F Lems; Francisca Jaime; Irene E van der Horst-Bruinsma
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Baricitinib versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Peter C Taylor; Edward C Keystone; Désirée van der Heijde; Michael E Weinblatt; Liliana Del Carmen Morales; Jaime Reyes Gonzaga; Sergey Yakushin; Taeko Ishii; Kahaku Emoto; Scott Beattie; Vipin Arora; Carol Gaich; Terence Rooney; Douglas Schlichting; William L Macias; Stephanie de Bono; Yoshiya Tanaka
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales.

Authors:  J F Fries; P W Spitz; D Y Young
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  A simplified disease activity index for rheumatoid arthritis for use in clinical practice.

Authors:  J S Smolen; F C Breedveld; M H Schiff; J R Kalden; P Emery; G Eberl; P L van Riel; P Tugwell
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 6.  Janus kinase inhibitors in autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  John J O'Shea; Apostolos Kontzias; Kunihiro Yamaoka; Yoshiya Tanaka; Arian Laurence
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Geographic variation in rheumatoid arthritis incidence among women in the United States.

Authors:  Karen H Costenbader; Shun-Chiao Chang; Francine Laden; Robin Puett; Elizabeth W Karlson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-08-11

8.  Acute phase reactants add little to composite disease activity indices for rheumatoid arthritis: validation of a clinical activity score.

Authors:  Daniel Aletaha; Valerie P K Nell; Tanja Stamm; Martin Uffmann; Stephan Pflugbeil; Klaus Machold; Josef S Smolen
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 5.156

9.  Impact of baseline anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide-2 antibody concentration on efficacy outcomes following treatment with subcutaneous abatacept or adalimumab: 2-year results from the AMPLE trial.

Authors:  Jeremy Sokolove; Michael Schiff; Roy Fleischmann; Michael E Weinblatt; Sean E Connolly; Alyssa Johnsen; Jin Zhu; Michael A Maldonado; Salil Patel; William H Robinson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Impact of obesity on the response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in axial spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Raphael Micheroli; Monika Hebeisen; Lukas M Wildi; Pascale Exer; Giorgio Tamborrini; Jürg Bernhard; Burkhard Möller; Pascal Zufferey; Michael J Nissen; Almut Scherer; Adrian Ciurea
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.