Literature DB >> 29680875

Salvage regimens using conventional chemotherapy agents for relapsed/refractory adult AML patients: a systematic literature review.

Juan Eduardo Megías-Vericat1, David Martínez-Cuadrón2,3, Miguel Ángel Sanz2,3, Pau Montesinos4,5.   

Abstract

Prognosis in relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) patients is dismal, with no satisfactory and standard salvage chemotherapy regimen. We performed a systematic review in order to analyze the clinical outcomes reported with conventional chemotherapy schemes in adult patients with R/R AML. To have a better understanding of the R/R ground, we included studies in R/R AML adult population at any disease stage (i.e., primary refractory as well as first relapse or beyond). Study selection included a total number of 157 out of 850 records, with a wide variety of schedules. Furthermore, only 24 studies were randomized clinical trials (RCTs), being the majority of the studies retrospective analyses in small cohorts. This review reveals that several intensive regimens (cytarabine + mitoxantrone + etoposide or gemtuzumab, and cytarabine + purine analogue ± antracycline) achieve relatively high complete remission (CR) rates (44 to 59.4%). However, most of these schemes did not obtain substantial CR duration (4.9 to 9.8 months) or overall survival (6.2 to 8.7 months). In unfit/vulnerable patients non-intensive approaches are recommended to control disease progression and minimize treatment-related mortality. A better knowledge of the prognostic factors, more effective and less toxic combinations using conventional and new therapies, as well as improvements in allo-HSCT procedure and timing, could play a role to improve the clinical outcomes in the future. Clinical trials should be the first treatment option in R/R AML, both in fit and unfit patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia; Refractory; Relapse; Salvage therapy; Systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29680875     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-018-3304-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  22 in total

Review 1.  Cytotoxic therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: not quite dead yet.

Authors:  Laura C Michaelis
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

2.  [Diagnosis and treatment of acute myeloid leukemia : The updated 2018 Onkopedia Guideline].

Authors:  Christoph Röllig
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 3.  Emerging agents and regimens for treatment of relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Longzhen Cui; Yan Liu; Yifan Pang; Tingting Qian; Liang Quan; Zhiheng Cheng; Yifeng Dai; Xu Ye; Ying Pang; Jinlong Shi; Xiaoyan Ke; Depei Wu; Lin Fu
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 5.987

4.  Outcome of salvage intra-arterial chemotherapy for recurrent retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Jiakai Li; Chaohui Jing; Xuming Hua; Tingyi Liang; Jing Li; Peiquan Zhao; Xunda Ji
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.456

5.  A multi-institutional comparison of mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine vs high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Sonia Christian; Saad Arain; Pritesh Patel; Irum Khan; Gregory S Calip; Vaibhav Agrawal; Karen Sweiss; Shawn Griffin; Kirk Cahill; Heiko Konig; Aysenur Esen; Ardaman Shergill; Olatoyosi Odenike; Wendy Stock; John G Quigley
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 13.265

6.  Reassessing the role of high dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jonathan Canaani; Meital Nagar; Gabriel Heering; Chen Gefen; Ronit Yerushalmi; Noga Shem-Tov; Yulia Volchek; Drorit Merkel; Abraham Avigdor; Avichai Shimoni; Ninette Amariglio; Gidi Rechavi; Arnon Nagler
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2020-06-09

7.  Differences in ex-vivo Chemosensitivity to Anthracyclines in First Line Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Juan Eduardo Megías-Vericat; David Martínez-Cuadrón; Joaquín Martínez López; Juan Miguel Bergua; Mar Tormo; Josefina Serrano; Ataulfo González; Jaime Pérez de Oteyza; Susana Vives; Belén Vidriales; Pilar Herrera; Juan Antonio Vera; Aurelio López Martínez; Adolfo de la Fuente; Ma Lourdes Amador; José-Ángel Hernández-Rivas; Ma Ángeles Fernández; Carlos Javier Cerveró; Daniel Morillo; Pilar Hernández Campo; Julián Gorrochategui; Daniel Primo; José Luis Rojas; Margarita Guenova; Joan Ballesteros; Miguel Sanz; Pau Montesinos
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.576

8.  Sequential therapy for patients with primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a historical prospective analysis of the German and Israeli experience.

Authors:  Ron Ram; Christof Scheid; Odelia Amit; Jens Markus Chemnitz; Yakir Moshe; Michael Hallek; Dominik Wolf; Irit Avivi; Udo Holtick
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 9.  Recent advances of targeted therapy in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jiale Ma; Zheng Ge
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.363

10.  Outcome of Relapsed or Refractory FLT3-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia Before Second-Generation FLT3 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Toulouse-Bordeaux DATAML Registry Study.

Authors:  Sarah Bertoli; Pierre-Yves Dumas; Emilie Bérard; Laetitia Largeaud; Audrey Bidet; Eric Delabesse; Suzanne Tavitian; Noémie Gadaud; Thibaut Leguay; Harmony Leroy; Jean-Baptiste Rieu; Jean-Philippe Vial; François Vergez; Nicolas Lechevalier; Isabelle Luquet; Emilie Klein; Audrey Sarry; Anne-Charlotte De Grande; Christian Récher; Arnaud Pigneux
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.