Literature DB >> 29680642

Symposium review: Uncertainties in enteric methane inventories, measurement techniques, and prediction models.

A N Hristov1, E Kebreab2, M Niu2, J Oh3, A Bannink4, A R Bayat5, T M Boland6, A F Brito7, D P Casper8, L A Crompton9, J Dijkstra10, M Eugène11, P C Garnsworthy12, N Haque13, A L F Hellwing14, P Huhtanen15, M Kreuzer16, B Kuhla17, P Lund14, J Madsen13, C Martin11, P J Moate18, S Muetzel19, C Muñoz20, N Peiren21, J M Powell22, C K Reynolds9, A Schwarm16, K J Shingfield23, T M Storlien24, M R Weisbjerg14, D R Yáñez-Ruiz25, Z Yu26.   

Abstract

Ruminant production systems are important contributors to anthropogenic methane (CH4) emissions, but there are large uncertainties in national and global livestock CH4 inventories. Sources of uncertainty in enteric CH4 emissions include animal inventories, feed dry matter intake (DMI), ingredient and chemical composition of the diets, and CH4 emission factors. There is also significant uncertainty associated with enteric CH4 measurements. The most widely used techniques are respiration chambers, the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique, and the automated head-chamber system (GreenFeed; C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD). All 3 methods have been successfully used in a large number of experiments with dairy or beef cattle in various environmental conditions, although studies that compare techniques have reported inconsistent results. Although different types of models have been developed to predict enteric CH4 emissions, relatively simple empirical (statistical) models have been commonly used for inventory purposes because of their broad applicability and ease of use compared with more detailed empirical and process-based mechanistic models. However, extant empirical models used to predict enteric CH4 emissions suffer from narrow spatial focus, limited observations, and limitations of the statistical technique used. Therefore, prediction models must be developed from robust data sets that can only be generated through collaboration of scientists across the world. To achieve high prediction accuracy, these data sets should encompass a wide range of diets and production systems within regions and globally. Overall, enteric CH4 prediction models are based on various animal or feed characteristic inputs but are dominated by DMI in one form or another. As a result, accurate prediction of DMI is essential for accurate prediction of livestock CH4 emissions. Analysis of a large data set of individual dairy cattle data showed that simplified enteric CH4 prediction models based on DMI alone or DMI and limited feed- or animal-related inputs can predict average CH4 emission with a similar accuracy to more complex empirical models. These simplified models can be reliably used for emission inventory purposes. The Authors. Published by FASS Inc. and Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).

Entities:  

Keywords:  enteric methane; livestock; prediction model; uncertainty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29680642     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  9 in total

1.  Characterization and mitigation option of greenhouse gas emissions from lactating Holstein dairy cows in East China.

Authors:  Peng Jia; Yan Tu; Zhihao Liu; Qi Lai; Fadi Li; Lifeng Dong; Qiyu Diao
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 2.  Feeding Strategies to Mitigate Enteric Methane Emission from Ruminants in Grassland Systems.

Authors:  Juan Vargas; Emilio Ungerfeld; Camila Muñoz; Nicolas DiLorenzo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.231

3.  Technical note: validation of the GreenFeed system for measuring enteric gas emissions from cattle.

Authors:  Sean M McGinn; Jean-Franҫois Coulombe; Karen A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Increase in Milk Yield from Cows through Improvement of Forage Production Using the N2-Fixing Legume Leucaena leucocephala in a Silvopastoral System.

Authors:  Lucero Sarabia-Salgado; Francisco Solorio-Sánchez; Luis Ramírez-Avilés; Bruno José Rodrigues Alves; Juan Ku-Vera; Carlos Aguilar-Pérez; Segundo Urquiaga; Robert Michael Boddey
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  The evolving role of Fourier-transform mid-infrared spectroscopy in genetic improvement of dairy cattle.

Authors:  K M Tiplady; T J Lopdell; M D Littlejohn; D J Garrick
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-17

6.  Effects of Dietary Forage Proportion on Feed Intake, Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Enteric Methane Emissions of Holstein Heifers at Various Growth Stages.

Authors:  Lifeng Dong; Binchang Li; Qiyu Diao
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 7.  Production performance, nutrient use efficiency, and predicted enteric methane emissions in dairy cows under confinement or grazing management system.

Authors:  Andre F Brito; Kleves V Almeida; Andre S Oliveira
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-02-26

Review 8.  Quantification of methane emitted by ruminants: a review of methods.

Authors:  Luis Orlindo Tedeschi; Adibe Luiz Abdalla; Clementina Álvarez; Samuel Weniga Anuga; Jacobo Arango; Karen A Beauchemin; Philippe Becquet; Alexandre Berndt; Robert Burns; Camillo De Camillis; Julián Chará; Javier Martin Echazarreta; Mélynda Hassouna; David Kenny; Michael Mathot; Rogerio M Mauricio; Shelby C McClelland; Mutian Niu; Alice Anyango Onyango; Ranjan Parajuli; Luiz Gustavo Ribeiro Pereira; Agustin Del Prado; Maria Paz Tieri; Aimable Uwizeye; Ermias Kebreab
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.338

9.  Volatile Fatty Acids in Ruminal Fluid Can Be Used to Predict Methane Yield of Dairy Cows.

Authors:  S Richard O Williams; Murray C Hannah; Joe L Jacobs; William J Wales; Peter J Moate
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.