OBJECTIVE: This technical bulletin reviews the evidence relating to risks and benefits of using intravaginal laser technology in the management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause and stress urinary incontinence. INTENDED USERS: Gynaecologists, urogynaecologists, urologists, and other health care professionals who assess, counsel, and provide care for women with genitourinary syndrome of menopause and stress urinary incontinence. TARGET POPULATION: Adult women with genitourinary syndrome of menopause and stress urinary incontinence seeking complementary or alternative treatment options to topical estrogen, non-hormonal vaginal moisturizers, physiotherapy, intravaginal devices, and surgery. OPTIONS: The discussion relates to intravaginal laser treatments for genitourinary syndrome of menopause compared with topical estrogen and that for stress urinary incontinence. OUTCOMES: The outcomes of interest are objective and subjective rates of response to treatment, histologic outcomes, and procedural complications. EVIDENCE: PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Database, and EMBASE were searched using the key words "genitourinary syndrome of menopause," "vaginal laser," "topical estrogen," and "urogenital atrophy." Results were restricted to English and human research. Articles were included until the end of September 2016. Clinical practice guidelines and guidelines of specialty societies were reviewed. Included studies were observational or prospective cohort when available. Only publications with study groups larger than or equal to 20 individuals were included, and non-peer-reviewed papers were excluded. VALIDATION METHODS: The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed upon by the principal authors. The Board of the SOGC approved the final draft for publication. The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology framework. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND/OR COSTS: It is expected that this technical bulletin will benefit patients with genitourinary syndrome of menopause by ensuring treating physicians are aware of all treatment options including the potential benefit and associated risk with intravaginal laser therapy. This should guide patient informed consent before such procedures are undertaken. There are no direct harms or costs identified with the implementation of this guideline. SPONSORS: The SOGC. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATIONS.
OBJECTIVE: This technical bulletin reviews the evidence relating to risks and benefits of using intravaginal laser technology in the management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause and stress urinary incontinence. INTENDED USERS: Gynaecologists, urogynaecologists, urologists, and other health care professionals who assess, counsel, and provide care for women with genitourinary syndrome of menopause and stress urinary incontinence. TARGET POPULATION: Adult women with genitourinary syndrome of menopause and stress urinary incontinence seeking complementary or alternative treatment options to topical estrogen, non-hormonal vaginal moisturizers, physiotherapy, intravaginal devices, and surgery. OPTIONS: The discussion relates to intravaginal laser treatments for genitourinary syndrome of menopause compared with topical estrogen and that for stress urinary incontinence. OUTCOMES: The outcomes of interest are objective and subjective rates of response to treatment, histologic outcomes, and procedural complications. EVIDENCE: PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Database, and EMBASE were searched using the key words "genitourinary syndrome of menopause," "vaginal laser," "topical estrogen," and "urogenital atrophy." Results were restricted to English and human research. Articles were included until the end of September 2016. Clinical practice guidelines and guidelines of specialty societies were reviewed. Included studies were observational or prospective cohort when available. Only publications with study groups larger than or equal to 20 individuals were included, and non-peer-reviewed papers were excluded. VALIDATION METHODS: The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed upon by the principal authors. The Board of the SOGC approved the final draft for publication. The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology framework. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND/OR COSTS: It is expected that this technical bulletin will benefit patients with genitourinary syndrome of menopause by ensuring treating physicians are aware of all treatment options including the potential benefit and associated risk with intravaginal laser therapy. This should guide patient informed consent before such procedures are undertaken. There are no direct harms or costs identified with the implementation of this guideline. SPONSORS: The SOGC. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATIONS.