Bonnie M Vest1, D Lynn Homish2, Jennifer Fillo3, Gregory G Homish2. 1. Department of Family Medicine, University at Buffalo, 77 Goodell Street, Suite 220, Buffalo, NY 14203, United States. Electronic address: bvest@buffalo.edu. 2. Department of Community Health & Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, 325 Kimball Tower, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States. 3. Research Institute on Addictions, 1021 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14203, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to explore differences in alcohol problems as a function of military status (current soldier, previous soldier and civilian spouses), and the possible interaction between sex and military status. We hypothesized that 1) soldiers would be at greater risk for alcohol problems than civilian spouses, and 2) former soldiers would be at greater risk compared to current soldiers. METHODS: Data were drawn from Operation: SAFETY, a longitudinal study examining physical and mental health among U.S. Army Reserve and National Guard soldiers and their partners. The analytic sample included male and female participants who completed both the baseline and first follow-up assessments (N = 772). Negative binomial regression models were used to examine differences between military status group on alcohol problems at follow-up, controlling for sex and alcohol consumption at baseline. Interactions between military status and sex were also examined. RESULTS: Among current soldiers, males experienced significantly more alcohol problems compared to women (4.47, 3.46; p = 0.005). Likewise, among previous soldiers, males experienced significantly more alcohol problems compared to women (6.69, 2.92; p = 0.002). Male previous soldiers had significantly more alcohol problems compared to both male current soldiers and male civilian spouses (6.69, 4.47, p = 0.04; 6.69, 3.96; p = 0.02). Among women, there were no significant differences by military status. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that male previous soldiers are at greater risk of alcohol problems than both current soldiers and civilian spouses. Health care and service providers should consider screening and monitoring soldiers who separate from the military, as alcohol use may increase.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to explore differences in alcohol problems as a function of military status (current soldier, previous soldier and civilian spouses), and the possible interaction between sex and military status. We hypothesized that 1) soldiers would be at greater risk for alcohol problems than civilian spouses, and 2) former soldiers would be at greater risk compared to current soldiers. METHODS: Data were drawn from Operation: SAFETY, a longitudinal study examining physical and mental health among U.S. Army Reserve and National Guard soldiers and their partners. The analytic sample included male and female participants who completed both the baseline and first follow-up assessments (N = 772). Negative binomial regression models were used to examine differences between military status group on alcohol problems at follow-up, controlling for sex and alcohol consumption at baseline. Interactions between military status and sex were also examined. RESULTS: Among current soldiers, males experienced significantly more alcohol problems compared to women (4.47, 3.46; p = 0.005). Likewise, among previous soldiers, males experienced significantly more alcohol problems compared to women (6.69, 2.92; p = 0.002). Male previous soldiers had significantly more alcohol problems compared to both male current soldiers and male civilian spouses (6.69, 4.47, p = 0.04; 6.69, 3.96; p = 0.02). Among women, there were no significant differences by military status. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that male previous soldiers are at greater risk of alcohol problems than both current soldiers and civilian spouses. Health care and service providers should consider screening and monitoring soldiers who separate from the military, as alcohol use may increase.
Authors: Robert M Bray; Michael R Pemberton; Marian E Lane; Laurel L Hourani; Mark J Mattiko; Lorraine A Babeu Journal: Mil Med Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Anna Kline; Marc D Weiner; Donald S Ciccone; Alejandro Interian; Lauren St Hill; Miklos Losonczy Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Adrian J Blow; Lisa Gorman; Dara Ganoczy; Michelle Kees; Deborah A Kashy; Marcia Valenstein; Sheila M Marcus; Hiram E Fitzgerald; Stephen Chermack Journal: J Fam Psychol Date: 2013-04
Authors: Isabel G Jacobson; Margaret A K Ryan; Tomoko I Hooper; Tyler C Smith; Paul J Amoroso; Edward J Boyko; Gary D Gackstetter; Timothy S Wells; Nicole S Bell Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-08-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Bonnie M Vest; Rachel A Hoopsick; Jennifer Fillo; D Lynn Homish; Gregory G Homish Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2022-07 Impact factor: 3.346