Literature DB >> 29679735

Age-dependent effects of brain stimulation on network centrality.

Daria Antonenko1, Till Nierhaus2, Marcus Meinzer3, Kristin Prehn4, Axel Thielscher5, Bernd Ittermann6, Agnes Flöel7.   

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have suggested that advanced age may mediate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on brain function. However, studies directly comparing neural tDCS effects between young and older adults are scarce and limited to task-related imaging paradigms. Resting-state (rs-) fMRI, that is independent of age-related differences in performance, is well suited to investigate age-associated differential neural tDCS effects. Three "online" tDCS conditions (anodal, cathodal, sham) were compared in a cross-over, within-subject design, in 30 young and 30 older adults. Active stimulation targeted the left sensorimotor network (active electrode over left sensorimotor cortex with right supraorbital reference electrode). A graph-based rs-fMRI data analysis approach (eigenvector centrality mapping) and complementary seed-based analyses characterized neural tDCS effects. An interaction between anodal tDCS and age group was observed. Specifically, centrality in bilateral paracentral and posterior regions (precuneus, superior parietal cortex) was increased in young, but decreased in older adults. Seed-based analyses revealed that these opposing patterns of tDCS-induced centrality modulation originated from differential effects of tDCS on functional coupling of the stimulated left paracentral lobule. Cathodal tDCS did not show significant effects. Our study provides first evidence for differential tDCS effects on neural network organization in young and older adults. Anodal stimulation mainly affected coupling of sensorimotor with ventromedial prefrontal areas in young and decoupling with posteromedial areas in older adults.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Aging; Eigenvector centrality mapping; Graph analysis; Resting-state functional connectivity; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29679735     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  14 in total

Review 1.  Age-related changes in motor cortex plasticity assessed with non-invasive brain stimulation: an update and new perspectives.

Authors:  John G Semmler; Brodie J Hand; Ryoki Sasaki; Ashley Merkin; George M Opie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Potential of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease: Optimizing Trials Toward Clinical Use.

Authors:  Giuseppina Pilloni; Leigh E Charvet; Marom Bikson; Nikhil Palekar; Min-Jeong Kim
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.566

3.  Modulation of network centrality and gray matter microstructure using multi-session brain stimulation and memory training.

Authors:  Friederike Thams; Nadine Külzow; Agnes Flöel; Daria Antonenko
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 5.399

4.  Estimation of individually induced e-field strength during transcranial electric stimulation using the head circumference.

Authors:  Daria Antonenko; Ulrike Grittner; Oula Puonti; Agnes Flöel; Axel Thielscher
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 9.184

5.  Optimising Cognitive Enhancement: Systematic Assessment of the Effects of tDCS Duration in Older Adults.

Authors:  Claire J Hanley; Sophie L Alderman; Elinor Clemence
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-05-16

6.  tDCS-induced episodic memory enhancement and its association with functional network coupling in older adults.

Authors:  Daria Antonenko; Dayana Hayek; Justus Netzband; Ulrike Grittner; Agnes Flöel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation modulates spatial memory in young healthy adults.

Authors:  Danica Hilliard; Susanne Passow; Franka Thurm; Nicolas W Schuck; Alexander Garthe; Gerd Kempermann; Shu-Chen Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity?

Authors:  Fenne M Smits; Dennis J L G Schutter; Jack van Honk; Elbert Geuze
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Neural and Psychological Predictors of Cognitive Enhancement and Impairment from Neurostimulation.

Authors:  Li-Zhuang Yang; Wei Zhang; Wenjuan Wang; Zhiyu Yang; Hongzhi Wang; Zhi-De Deng; Chuanfu Li; Bensheng Qiu; Da-Ren Zhang; Roi Cohen Kadosh; Hai Li; Xiaochu Zhang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 16.806

10.  Earliest amyloid and tau deposition modulate the influence of limbic networks during closed-loop hippocampal downregulation.

Authors:  Stavros Skouras; Jordi Torner; Patrik Andersson; Yury Koush; Carles Falcon; Carolina Minguillon; Karine Fauria; Francesc Alpiste; Kaj Blenow; Henrik Zetterberg; Juan D Gispert; José L Molinuevo
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.