Ilufredo Y Tantoy1, Bruce A Cooper1, Anand Dhruva2, Janine Cataldo1, Steven M Paul1, Yvette P Conley3, Marilyn Hammer4, Kord M Kober1, Jon D Levine2, Christine Miaskowski5,6. 1. School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 2. School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 4. Department of Nursing, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA. 5. School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. chris.miaskowski@ucsf.edu. 6. Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, 2 Koret Way - N631F, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0610, USA. chris.miaskowski@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Findings regarding changes in the quality of life (QOL) of patients with gastrointestinal cancers (GI) undergoing chemotherapy (CTX) are inconclusive. Purpose was to evaluate for changes in QOL scores of patients with GI cancers over two cycles of CTX. METHODS: Patients (n = 397) completed disease-specific [i.e., Quality of Life-Scale-Patient Version (QOL-PV)] and generic [12-item Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Survey (SF-12)] measures of QOL a total of six times over two cycles of CTX. Changes in these QOL scores were evaluated using bootstrapped multilevel regression with full information maximum likelihood estimation. Treatment group (i.e., with or without targeted therapy), age, number of metastatic sites, time from cancer diagnosis, number of prior cancer treatments, GI cancer diagnosis (i.e., colon/rectum/anal vs. other), and CTX regimen were evaluated as covariates in the conditional models for each of the QOL scores. RESULTS: During the second cycle of CTX, QOL-PV scores decreased in the week following CTX administration, and then increased the following week. For both cycles of CTX, the physical component summary and mental component summary scores of the SF-12 decreased in the week following CTX administration and then increased the following week. Increased time from cancer diagnosis and a higher number of prior cancer treatments resulted in worse QOL-PV and SF-12 scores at enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: While changes in QOL scores over the two CTX cycles were statistically significant, the differences were not clinically meaningful. Future studies need to determine the optimal timing of QOL assessments to assess changes associated with cancer treatments.
PURPOSE: Findings regarding changes in the quality of life (QOL) of patients with gastrointestinal cancers (GI) undergoing chemotherapy (CTX) are inconclusive. Purpose was to evaluate for changes in QOL scores of patients with GI cancers over two cycles of CTX. METHODS:Patients (n = 397) completed disease-specific [i.e., Quality of Life-Scale-Patient Version (QOL-PV)] and generic [12-item Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Survey (SF-12)] measures of QOL a total of six times over two cycles of CTX. Changes in these QOL scores were evaluated using bootstrapped multilevel regression with full information maximum likelihood estimation. Treatment group (i.e., with or without targeted therapy), age, number of metastatic sites, time from cancer diagnosis, number of prior cancer treatments, GI cancer diagnosis (i.e., colon/rectum/anal vs. other), and CTX regimen were evaluated as covariates in the conditional models for each of the QOL scores. RESULTS: During the second cycle of CTX, QOL-PV scores decreased in the week following CTX administration, and then increased the following week. For both cycles of CTX, the physical component summary and mental component summary scores of the SF-12 decreased in the week following CTX administration and then increased the following week. Increased time from cancer diagnosis and a higher number of prior cancer treatments resulted in worse QOL-PV and SF-12 scores at enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: While changes in QOL scores over the two CTX cycles were statistically significant, the differences were not clinically meaningful. Future studies need to determine the optimal timing of QOL assessments to assess changes associated with cancer treatments.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chemotherapy; Gastrointestinal cancer; Quality of life; Targeted therapy
Authors: Linda Sarna; Jean K Brown; Mary E Cooley; Roma D Williams; Cynthia Chernecky; Geraldine Padilla; Leda Layo Danao Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2005-01-19 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Beate Mayrbäurl; Johannes M Giesinger; Sonja Burgstaller; Gudrun Piringer; Bernhard Holzner; Josef Thaler Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-07-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Niall C Tebbutt; Kate Wilson; Val J Gebski; Michelle M Cummins; Diana Zannino; Guy A van Hazel; Bridget Robinson; Adam Broad; Vinod Ganju; Stephen P Ackland; Garry Forgeson; David Cunningham; Mark P Saunders; Martin R Stockler; Yujo Chua; John R Zalcberg; R John Simes; Timothy J Price Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David P Smith; Madeleine T King; Sam Egger; Martin P Berry; Phillip D Stricker; Paul Cozzi; Jeanette Ward; Dianne L O'Connell; Bruce K Armstrong Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-11-27
Authors: Yufen Lin; Donald E Bailey; Sharron L Docherty; Laura S Porter; Bruce A Cooper; Steven M Paul; Marilyn J Hammer; Yvette P Conley; Jon D Levine; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2022 Mar-Apr 01 Impact factor: 2.592