Literature DB >> 29679247

Neuromuscular and electromechanical properties of ultra-power athletes: the traceurs.

Sidney Grosprêtre1, Philippe Gimenez2, Alain Martin3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Practising a power-type activity over years can shape the neuromuscular profile of athletes. This study aimed at comparing the neuromuscular profile of a non-trained group (NT, n = 10) to power athletes practising Parkour (= traceurs, group PK, n = 11), an activity consisting of jumping obstacles mostly in an urban landscape.
METHODS: Maximal isometric plantar flexion force (MVC) and rate of torque development (RTD) were evaluated, and neuromuscular function of triceps surae muscles was assessed and compared between groups through the analysis of evoked potentials from posterior tibial nerve stimulation.
RESULTS: PK group exhibited higher MVC force (131.3 ± 8.7 Nm) than NT (110.4 ± 9.6 Nm, P = 0.03) and higher RTD (489.1 ± 93 Nm/s) than NT (296.9 ± 81 Nm/s). At a nervous level, this greater performance was related to a greater voluntary activation level (PK: 96.8 ± 3.6%; NT: 91.5 ± 7.7%; P = 0.02) and soleus V-wave amplitude (P = 0.03), and a lower antagonist co-activation (P = 0.02) and rest soleus spinal excitability (PK Hmax/Mmax: 0.32 ± 0.13; NT: 0.58 ± 0.17; P < 0.001). At a muscular level, PK group exhibited higher mechanical twitch amplitude (PK: 13.42 ± 3.52 Nm; NT: 9.86 ± 4.38 Nm; P = 0.03) and electromechanical efficiency (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: The greater maximal force production capacity of traceurs compared to untrained was underlain by nervous factors, such as greater descending command and greater ability to modulate the spinal excitability, but also by muscular factors such as greater excitation-contraction coupling efficiency. The high eccentric loads that characterize Parkour training may have led traceurs to exhibit such neuromuscular profile.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electromyography; Force; Free running; H-reflex; M-wave; Parkour; Rate of force development; Twitch; Voluntary activation level

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29679247     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-3868-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  43 in total

1.  Electrical and mechanical H(max)-to-M(max) ratio in power- and endurance-trained athletes.

Authors:  N A Maffiuletti; A Martin; N Babault; M Pensini; B Lucas; M Schieppati
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2001-01

2.  Spinal reflex plasticity during maximal dynamic contractions after eccentric training.

Authors:  Julien Duclay; Alain Martin; Alice Robbe; Michel Pousson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Resistance training and neuromuscular performance in seniors.

Authors:  U Granacher; M Gruber; A Gollhofer
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.118

4.  Neuromuscular differences between volleyball players, middle distance runners and untrained controls.

Authors:  G G Sleivert; R D Backus; H A Wenger
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.118

5.  A review of the H-reflex and M-wave in the human triceps surae.

Authors:  Kylie J Tucker; Meltem Tuncer; Kemal S Türker
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Evoked spinal reflexes and force development in elite athletes with middle-portion Achilles tendinopathy.

Authors:  Hsing-Kuo Wang; Kwan-Hwa Lin; Yu-Kuang Wu; Shyh-Ching Chi; Tifany Ting-Fang Shih; Yung-Cheng Huang
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  In vivo fascicle behavior of synergistic muscles in concentric and eccentric plantar flexions in humans.

Authors:  Kentaro Chino; Toshiaki Oda; Toshiyuki Kurihara; Toshihiko Nagayoshi; Kohki Yoshikawa; Hiroaki Kanehisa; Tetsuo Fukunaga; Senshi Fukashiro; Yasuo Kawakami
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 2.368

8.  Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans.

Authors:  M Van Cutsem; J Duchateau; K Hainaut
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Conditioning effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation evoking motor-evoked potential on V-wave response.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Alain Martin
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2014-12-11

Review 10.  Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti; Per Aagaard; Anthony J Blazevich; Jonathan Folland; Neale Tillin; Jacques Duchateau
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.078

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the psychomotor, cognitive, and motor performances of power athletes.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Yohan Grandperrin; Magali Nicolier; Philippe Gimenez; Chrystelle Vidal; Gregory Tio; Emmanuel Haffen; Djamila Bennabi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on sports performance for two profiles of athletes (power and endurance) (COMPETE): a protocol for a randomised, crossover, double blind, controlled exploratory trial.

Authors:  Yohan Grandperrin; Sidney Grosprêtre; Magali Nicolier; Philippe Gimenez; Chrystelle Vidal; Emmanuel Haffen; Djamila Bennabi
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Validity and Reliability of a New Specific Parkour Test: Physiological and Performance Responses.

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Luca Paolo Ardigò; Massimo Bianco; Drazen Cular; Dejan Madic; Branko Markoski; Wissem Dhahbi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Leg Muscle Activity and Perception of Effort before and after Four Short Sessions of Submaximal Eccentric Cycling.

Authors:  Pierre Clos; Romuald Lepers
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.