| Literature DB >> 29679179 |
Xiaohui Wang1, Changdong Wang2, Junkang Sui1, Zhaoyang Liu2, Qian Li2, Chao Ji2, Xin Song2, Yurong Hu2, Changqian Wang2, Rongbo Sa1, Jiamiao Zhang2, Jianfeng Du2, Xunli Liu3.
Abstract
Rhizospheric microorganisms can increase phosphorus availability in the soil. In this regard, the ability of phosphofungi to dissolve insoluble phosphorus compounds is greater than that of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. The aim of the current study was to identify efficient phosphofungi that could be developed as commercial microbial agents. Among several phosphate-solubilizing fungal isolates screened, strain CS-1 showed the highest phosphorus-solubilization ability. Based on phylogenetic analysis of the internal transcribed spacer region sequence, it was identified as Aspergillus niger. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis revealed that the mechanism of phosphorus solubilization by CS-1 involved the synthesis and secretion of organic acids, mainly oxalic, tartaric, and citric acids. Furthermore, strain CS-1 exhibited other growth-promoting abilities, including efficient potassium release and degradation of crop straw cellulose. These properties help to returning crop residues to the soil, thereby increasing nutrient availability and sustaining organic matter concentration therein. A pot experiment revealed that CS-1 apparently increased the assessed biometric parameters of wheat seedlings, implying the potential of this strain to be developed as a commercial microbial agent. We used Illumina MiSeq sequencing to investigate the microbial community composition in the rhizosphere of uninoculated wheat plants and wheat plants inoculated with the CS-1 strain to obtain insight into the effect of the CS-1 strain inoculation. The data clearly demonstrated that CS-1 significantly reduced the content of pathogenic fungi, including Gibberella, Fusarium, Monographella, Bipolaris, and Volutella, which cause soil-borne diseases in various crops. Strain CS-1 may hence be developed into a microbial agent for plant growth improvement.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus niger; Growth-promoting ability; HPLC; Illumina MiSeq sequencing; Phosphofungi
Year: 2018 PMID: 29679179 PMCID: PMC5910442 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-018-0593-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Fig. 1Evaluation of the phosphate solubilising ability of the selected fungi in NBRIP medium. Soluble phosphorus (P) accumulation in cultures of different fungal strains grown on NBRIP medium. Error bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). Columns with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) according to the Student’s t-test
Effect of incubation period on the phosphate-solubilizing efficiency of the CS-1 strain
| Index | 1 day | 2 days | 3 days | 4 days | 5 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 3.71 ± 0.02b | 3.23 ± 0.41c | 2.45 ± 0.26d | 2.39 ± 0.11d | 2.34 ± 0.07d |
| Weight(dry weight/g) | 0.18 ± 0.023d | 0.27 ± 0.013c | 0.32 ± 0.007a | 0.30 ± 0.007ab | 0.29 ± 0.004bc |
| P(Increment mg/L) | 374.05 ± 53.95b | 617.27 ± 34.00a | 626.52 ± 8.50a | 646.92 ± 5.55a | 663.63 ± 22.26a |
Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Means sharing a common letter within the same column are not significantly different at P < 0.05
Fig. 2Analyses of organic acids secreted by CS-1 strain were performed by HPLC. HPLC analysis of organic acids. a Chromatogram of a standard solution containing the following organic acids: oxalic, tartaric, malic, lactic acid, acetic, citric, succinic, maleic, and fumaric acid. b Chromatogram of a 3-day-old culture medium inoculated with strain CS-1, mainly containing oxalic, tartaric, and citric acid
Effect of incubation period on the activity of enzymes produced by the CS-1 strain
| Enzyme activity | Incubation time (days) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 days | 3 days | 4 days | 5 days | 6 d | 7d | 8d | |
| Cellulase (U/mL) | 1.43 ± 0.56d | 124.05 ± 1.15d | 159.29 ± 59.96c | 375.84 ± 21.17b | 553.39 ± 76.61a | 345.53 ± 47.68b | 347.85 ± 13.57b |
| Hemicellulase (U/mL) | 2743.78 ± 55.97b | 2979.09 ± 8888.68a | 1655.41 ± 159.54ab | 1269.75 ± 53.02c | 1251.70 ± 16.34c | 997.92 ± 28.90c | _ |
Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Means sharing a common letter within the same column are not significantly different at P < 0.05
Effect of the CS-1 strain on growth parameters of wheat seedling
| Treatment | Shoot height (cm) | Root length (cm) | Dry weight (g) | Fresh weight (g) | Root/shoot ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 40.76 ± 0.83a | 17.78 ± 1.16a | 0.30 ± 0.04b | 1.26 ± 0.16b | 0.1809 ± 0.011b |
| CS-1 | 40.53 ± 1.20a | 18.15 ± 1.77a | 0.37 ± 0.05a | 1.56 ± 0.06a | 0.2378 ± 0.011a |
Values are mean ± SD (n = 30). Means sharing a common letter within the same column are not significantly different at P < 0.05. “CS-1” denotes wheat seedlings treated with a suspension of strain CS-1 spores. “CK” denotes wheat seedlings treated with an equal volume of sterile water
Diversity and richness indices of bacterial and fungal community from CS-1 treatment and control
| Index | Bacteria | Fungi | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | CS-1 | CK | CS-1 | |
| OTU | 1895.33 ± 38.66a | 1868.33 ± 7.54a | 539.67 ± 7.13a | 393.67 ± 49.57b |
| Shannon | 4.39 ± 0.52a | 4.46 ± 0.09a | 3.83 ± 0.17a | 2.98 ± 0.48b |
| Simpson | 0.05 ± 0.04a | 0.03 ± 0.01a | 0.062 ± 0.02a | 0.14 ± 0.02a |
| Ace | 412.75 ± 9.22a | 406.65 ± 9.35a | 611.01 ± 14.97a | 502.11 ± 26.11b |
| Chao | 414.42 ± 5.71a | 417.76 ± 17.06a | 588.30 ± 43.30a | 478.36 ± 12.77b |
| Coverage | 0.9978 | 0.9977 | 0.9966 | 0.9963 |
Chao and ACE value are indicators of species richness. Shannon and Simpson are indicators of species diversity. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Means sharing a common letter within the same column are not significantly different at P < 0.05
Fig. 3Rarefaction and Shannon curve of CS-1 and control treatments. Fungal and bacterial rarefaction curves and Shannon curves depicting the effect of CS-1 and control treatments on the number of OTUs. a Rarefaction curves of bacteria from CS-1 and control treatments. b Rarefaction curves of fungi from CS-1 and control treatments. c Shannon curves of bacteria from CS-1 and control treatments. d Shannon curves of fungi from CS-1 and control treatments
Fig. 4Relative abundance of the dominant bacterial and fungal phyla in CS-1 and control treatment. The relative abundance (%) of all bacteria and fungi on the phylum level in the rhizosphere soil of CS-1 and control treatments. a The relative abundance of all detected bacterial phyla after the control treatment. b The relative abundance of all detected bacterial phyla after the CS-1 treatment. c The relative abundance of all detected fungal phyla control treatment. d The relative abundance of all detected fungal phyla after the CS-1 treatment
Fig. 5Relative abundance of bacteria (genus levels) and fungi (order levels) in CS-1 and control treatments. The relative abundance (%) of all bacteria (a) and fungi (b) on the order and genus levels, respectively, in the rhizosphere soil of CS-1 and control treatments
Fig. 6Multi pathogenic fungal genera difference test between CS-1 and control treatments. Multi-pathogenic fungal genera difference test between CS-1 treatment and control treatments. Error bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). Columns with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) according to Student’s t-test