Literature DB >> 29678561

Distribution of take-home opioid antagonist kits during a synthetic opioid epidemic in British Columbia, Canada: a modelling study.

Michael A Irvine1, Jane A Buxton2, Michael Otterstatter2, Robert Balshaw3, Reka Gustafson4, Mark Tyndall2, Perry Kendall5, Thomas Kerr6, Mark Gilbert2, Daniel Coombs7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Illicit use of high-potency synthetic opioids has become a global issue over the past decade. This misuse is particularly pronounced in British Columbia, Canada, where a rapid increase in availability of fentanyl and other synthetic opioids in the local illicit drug supply during 2016 led to a substantial increase in overdoses and deaths. In response, distribution of take-home naloxone (THN) overdose prevention kits was scaled up (6·4-fold increase) throughout the province. The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of the THN programme in terms of the number of deaths averted over the study period.
METHODS: We estimated the impact of THN kits on the ongoing epidemic among people who use illicit opioids in British Columbia and explored counterfactual scenarios for the provincial response. A Markov chain model was constructed explicitly including opioid-related deaths, fentanyl-related deaths, ambulance-attended overdoses, and uses of THN kits. The model was calibrated in a Bayesian framework incorporating population data between Jan 1, 2012, and Oct 31, 2016.
FINDINGS: 22 499 ambulance-attended overdoses and 2121 illicit drug-related deaths (677 [32%] deaths related to fentanyl) were recorded in the study period, mostly since January, 2016. In the same period, 19 074 THN kits were distributed. We estimate that 298 deaths (95% credible interval [CrI] 91-474) were averted by the THN programme. Of these deaths, 226 (95% CrI 125-340) were averted in 2016, following a rapid scale-up in distribution of kits. We infer a rapid increase in fentanyl adulterant at the beginning of 2016, with an estimated 2·3 times (95% CrI 2·0-2·9) increase from 2015 to 2016. Counterfactual modelling indicated that an earlier scale-up of the programme would have averted an additional 118 deaths (95% CrI 64-207). Our model also indicated that the increase in deaths could parsimoniously be explained through a change in the fentanyl-related overdose rate alone.
INTERPRETATION: The THN programme substantially reduced the number of overdose deaths during a period of rapid increase in the number of illicit drug overdoses due to fentanyl in British Columbia. However, earlier adoption and distribution of the THN intervention might have had an even greater impact on overdose deaths. Our findings show the value of a fast and effective response at the start of a synthetic opioid epidemic. We also believe that multiple interventions are needed to achieve an optimal impact. FUNDING: Canadian Institutes of Health Research Partnerships for Health Systems Improvement programme (grant 318068) and Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grant 04611).
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29678561     DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30044-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Public Health


  30 in total

1.  Modelling the combined impact of interventions in averting deaths during a synthetic-opioid overdose epidemic.

Authors:  Michael A Irvine; Margot Kuo; Jane A Buxton; Robert Balshaw; Michael Otterstatter; Laura Macdougall; M-J Milloy; Aamir Bharmal; Bonnie Henry; Mark Tyndall; Daniel Coombs; Mark Gilbert
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  A Public Health Strategy for the Opioid Crisis.

Authors:  Brendan Saloner; Emma E McGinty; Leo Beletsky; Ricky Bluthenthal; Chris Beyrer; Michael Botticelli; Susan G Sherman
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Applying principles of injury and infectious disease control to the opioid mortality epidemic in North America: critical intervention gaps.

Authors:  Benedikt Fischer; Michelle Pang; Mark Tyndall
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.341

4.  Naloxone perspectives from people who use opioids: Findings from an ethnographic study in three states.

Authors:  Miriam Boeri; Aukje K Lamonica
Journal:  J Am Assoc Nurse Pract       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 1.165

5.  Naloxone distribution, trauma, and supporting community-based overdose responders.

Authors:  Daniel Shearer; Taylor Fleming; Al Fowler; Jade Boyd; Ryan McNeil
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2018-12-05

6.  Businesses in high drug use areas as potential sources of naloxone during overdose emergencies.

Authors:  Kristin E Schneider; Saba Rouhani; Noelle P Weicker; Miles Morris; Susan G Sherman
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Evaluating the population-level effects of overdose prevention sites and supervised consumption sites in British Columbia, Canada: Controlled interrupted time series.

Authors:  Dimitra Panagiotoglou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Characterizing fentanyl-related overdoses and implications for overdose response: Findings from a rapid ethnographic study in Vancouver, Canada.

Authors:  Samara Mayer; Jade Boyd; Alexandra Collins; Mary Clare Kennedy; Nadia Fairbairn; Ryan McNeil
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Preliminary Results of Psychiatric Inpatients Referred to an Addiction Medicine Consult Service.

Authors:  Colin McWilliams; Kofi Bonnie; Samantha Robinson; Cheyenne Johnson; Joseph H Puyat; Jan Klimas
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.702

10.  The implementation and role of a staff naloxone program for non-profit community-based sites in British Columbia: A descriptive study.

Authors:  Sierra Williams; Tanis King; Kristi Papamihali; Jane A Buxton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.