Arttu O Lehtonen1,2, Ville L Langén1,3,4, Kimmo Porthan5, Mika Kähönen6, Markku S Nieminen5, Antti M Jula1,4, Teemu J Niiranen1,4. 1. National Institute for Health and Welfare, Turku. 2. Department of Geriatrics, University of Turku. 3. Heart Centre, Turku University Hospital. 4. Division of Medicine, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku. 5. Division of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Centre, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki. 6. Department of Clinical Physiology, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the predictive value of ECG abnormalities for atrial fibrillation in nonhypertensive versus hypertensive individuals. METHODS: We recorded ECG and measured conventional cardiovascular risk factors in a nationwide population-based sample of 5813 Finns. We divided the participants into nonhypertensive (n = 3148) and hypertensive (n = 2665) individuals and followed the participants for incident atrial fibrillation events. We evaluated the predictive ability of 12 ECG abnormalities for atrial fibrillation using multivariable-adjusted Fine-Gray models. RESULTS: During a follow-up of 11.9 ± 2.9 years, 111 nonhypertensive and 301 hypertensive participants developed atrial fibrillation. Negative T wave in lateral leads predicted atrial fibrillation in both nonhypertensive [hazard ratio (HR), 4.59; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.84-11.44] and hypertensive participants (HR, 1.81; 95% CI 1.16-2.84). In nonhypertensive participants, 1-SD increments in corrected QT interval (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.18-1.71) and T-wave amplitude in lead augmented vector R (aVR) (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.10-1.80) were related to atrial fibrillation. In hypertensive participants, prolonged PR interval (HR, 1.59; 95% CI 1.05-2.41), prolonged P-wave duration (HR, 1.43; 95% CI 1.07-1.91), left ventricular hypertrophy by Sokolow-Lyon criteria (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.12-2.14) and poor R-wave progression (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.02-2.48) predicted atrial fibrillation. Corrected QT interval and T-wave amplitude in lead aVR were stronger predictors of atrial fibrillation in nonhypertensive than in hypertensive participants. ECG abnormalities improved risk prediction only marginally (delta area under receiver-operating-characteristic curve = 0.000-0.005). CONCLUSION: Several ECG abnormalities associate with incident atrial fibrillation in hypertensive and nonhypertensive individuals but provide only marginal incremental predictive value. Corrected QT interval and T-wave amplitude in lead aVR may relate stronger to incident atrial fibrillation in nonhypertensive than in hypertensive individuals.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the predictive value of ECG abnormalities for atrial fibrillation in nonhypertensive versus hypertensive individuals. METHODS: We recorded ECG and measured conventional cardiovascular risk factors in a nationwide population-based sample of 5813 Finns. We divided the participants into nonhypertensive (n = 3148) and hypertensive (n = 2665) individuals and followed the participants for incident atrial fibrillation events. We evaluated the predictive ability of 12 ECG abnormalities for atrial fibrillation using multivariable-adjusted Fine-Gray models. RESULTS: During a follow-up of 11.9 ± 2.9 years, 111 nonhypertensive and 301 hypertensiveparticipants developed atrial fibrillation. Negative T wave in lateral leads predicted atrial fibrillation in both nonhypertensive [hazard ratio (HR), 4.59; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.84-11.44] and hypertensiveparticipants (HR, 1.81; 95% CI 1.16-2.84). In nonhypertensive participants, 1-SD increments in corrected QT interval (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.18-1.71) and T-wave amplitude in lead augmented vector R (aVR) (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.10-1.80) were related to atrial fibrillation. In hypertensiveparticipants, prolonged PR interval (HR, 1.59; 95% CI 1.05-2.41), prolonged P-wave duration (HR, 1.43; 95% CI 1.07-1.91), left ventricular hypertrophy by Sokolow-Lyon criteria (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.12-2.14) and poor R-wave progression (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.02-2.48) predicted atrial fibrillation. Corrected QT interval and T-wave amplitude in lead aVR were stronger predictors of atrial fibrillation in nonhypertensive than in hypertensiveparticipants. ECG abnormalities improved risk prediction only marginally (delta area under receiver-operating-characteristic curve = 0.000-0.005). CONCLUSION: Several ECG abnormalities associate with incident atrial fibrillation in hypertensive and nonhypertensive individuals but provide only marginal incremental predictive value. Corrected QT interval and T-wave amplitude in lead aVR may relate stronger to incident atrial fibrillation in nonhypertensive than in hypertensive individuals.