Literature DB >> 29676782

Evaluation of the Cincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center Hospital-in-Home Program.

Shubing Cai1,2, Andrew Grubbs3, Rajesh Makineni2,4, Bruce Kinosian5,6, Ciaran S Phibbs7,8, Orna Intrator1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine hospital readmissions, costs, mortality, and nursing home admissions of veterans who received Hospital-in-Home (HIH) services.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Cincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). PARTICIPANTS: Study cohort included veterans who received HIH services as an alternative to inpatient care between October 1, 2012, and November 30, 2015, and non-HIH veterans who were hospitalized for similar conditions in the Cincinnati VAMC during the same period. We identified 138 veterans who used HIH services and 694 non-HIH veterans. INTERVENTION: HIH veterans received hospital-equivalent care at home. Non-HIH veterans received traditional inpatient services in the Cincinnati VAMC. MEASUREMENTS: Total costs of care for treating an acute episode (HIH services vs inpatient) and likelihood of hospital readmission, death, or nursing home admission within 30 days of discharge from HIH services or hospitalization.
RESULTS: Average per person costs were $7,792 for HIH services and $10,960 for traditional inpatient care (P<0.001). HIH veterans were less likely to use a nursing home within 30 days of discharge (3.1%) than non-HIH veterans (12.6%) (P<0.001). Thirty-day readmission rates and mortality were not statistically different between HIH and non-HIH veterans.
CONCLUSION: The substitutive HIH model implemented in the Cincinnati VAMC delivered acute services in veterans' homes at lower cost and with lower likelihood of postdischarge nursing home use. Broader implementation of this innovative delivery model may benefit older adults in need of care while reducing healthcare system costs.
© 2018, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2018, The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hospital-in-Home; evaluation; veterans

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29676782     DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  4 in total

1.  Cost of home hospitalization versus inpatient hospitalization inclusive of a 30-day post-acute period.

Authors:  Pamela M Saenger; Katherine A Ornstein; Melissa M Garrido; Sara Lubetsky; Evan Bollens-Lund; Linda V DeCherrie; Bruce Leff; Albert L Siu; Alex D Federman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 7.538

2.  Hospital In Home: Evaluating Need and Readiness for Implementation (HENRI) in the Department of Veterans Affairs: protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation and participatory implementation planning study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Sullivan; Reza Yousefi-Nooraie; Derek D'Arcy; Adele Levine; Lindsey Zimmerman; Marlena H Shin; Emily Franzosa; William Hung; Orna Intrator
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2022-08-29

3.  Association of Costs and Days at Home With Transfer Hospital in Home.

Authors:  Shubing Cai; Orna Intrator; Caitlin Chan; Laurence Buxbaum; Mary Ann Haggerty; Ciaran S Phibbs; Edna Schwab; Bruce Kinosian
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-06-01

Review 4.  The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Genitourinary Cancer Care: Re-envisioning the Future.

Authors:  Christopher J D Wallis; James W F Catto; Antonio Finelli; Adam W Glaser; John L Gore; Stacy Loeb; Todd M Morgan; Alicia K Morgans; Nicolas Mottet; Richard Neal; Tim O'Brien; Anobel Y Odisho; Thomas Powles; Ted A Skolarus; Angela B Smith; Bernadett Szabados; Zachary Klaassen; Daniel E Spratt
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 20.096

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.