Literature DB >> 29676777

Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Older Adults During Hospitalization: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Karishma Patel1, Liron Sinvani1, Vidhi Patel2, Andrzej Kozikowski2, Christopher Smilios2, Meredith Akerman3, Kinga Kiszko1, Sutapa Maiti1, Negin Hajizadeh2, Gisele Wolf-Klein1,4, Renee Pekmezaris2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the effect of the presence and timing of a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order on short-term clinical outcomes, including mortality.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching to enable direct comparison of DNR and no-DNR groups.
SETTING: Large, academic tertiary-care center. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized medical patients aged 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included discharge disposition, length of stay, 30-day readmission, restraints, bladder catheters, and bedrest order.
RESULTS: Before propensity score matching, the DNR group (n=1,347) was significantly older (85.8 vs 79.6, p<.001) and had more comorbidities (3.0 vs 2.5, p<.001) than the no-DNR group (n=9,182). After propensity score matching, the DNR group had significantly longer stays (9.7 vs 6.0 days, p<.001), were more likely to be discharged to hospice (6.5% vs 0.7%, p<.001), and to die (12.2% vs 0.8%, p<.001). There was a significant difference in length of stay between those who had a DNR order written within 24 hours of admission (early DNR) and those who had a DNR order written more than 24 hours after admission (late DNR) (median 6 vs 10 days, p<.001). Individuals with early DNR were less likely to spend time in intensive care (10.6% vs 17.3%, p=.004), receive a palliative care consultation (8.2% vs 12.0%, p=.02), be restrained (5.8% vs 11.6%, p<.001), have an order for nothing by mouth (50.1% vs 56.0%, p=.03), have a bladder catheter (31.7% vs 40.9%, p<.001), or die in the hospital (10.2% vs 15.47%, p=.004) and more likely to be discharged home (65.5% vs 58.2%, p=.01).
CONCLUSION: Our study underscores the strong association between presence of a DNR order and mortality. Further studies are necessary to better understand the presence and timing of DNR orders in hospitalized older adults.
© 2018, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2018, The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNR; clinical outcomes; hospitalization; older adults

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29676777     DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  4 in total

1.  Association of Do-Not-Resuscitate Patient Case Mix With Publicly Reported Risk-Standardized Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates.

Authors:  Benjamin D Pollock; Jeph Herrin; Matthew R Neville; Sean C Dowdy; Pablo Moreno Franco; Nilay D Shah; Henry H Ting
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-07-01

2.  Advance Care Planning Documentation and Intensity of Care at the End of Life for Adults With Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Both Illnesses.

Authors:  Gwen M Bernacki; Cara L McDermott; Daniel D Matlock; Ann M O'Hare; Lyndia Brumback; Nisha Bansal; James N Kirkpatrick; Ruth A Engelberg; Jared Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of patients discharged from the ICU in a vegetative or minimally conscious state.

Authors:  Piotr Knapik; Dawid Borowik; Daniel Cieśla; Ewa Trejnowska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Impact of Do-Not-Resuscitate Order in the Emergency Department on Respiratory Failure after ICU Admission.

Authors:  Ting-Yu Hsu; Pei-Ming Wang; Po-Chun Chuang; Yan-Ren Lin; Yuan-Jhen Syue; Tsung-Cheng Tsai; Chao-Jui Li
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.