Elena De Ponti1, Sabrina Morzenti1, Cinzia Crivellaro2,3, Federica Elisei2, Andrea Crespi1, Luca Guerra2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Motion due to patient's breathing can introduce heavy bias in PET/CT, both in image quality and quantitation. This paper is a review of the main technical solutions available to manage movement in PET/CT studies: a) Respiratory Gated (RG), b) Motion Free (MF), c) End Expiration (EE), d) Banana Artefact Management (BAM) and e) Data Driven Gating (DDG).
METHODS: The most diffused solutions (RG, MF and EE) are based on LIST mode acquisition of a PET Field of View (4D FOV), centered on the anatomical region of interest; to link PET data not only to time and to spatial position but also to the corresponding breathing phase, the synchronized acquisition of the patient's breathing curve is performed by an external tracking device. Different commercial tools to track and to record patient breathing cycle are available to associate the internal organ motion with a measurable external parameter; for example these systems can measure the pressure on a chest elastic belt, the air flow trough patient nose, the breath-in and breath-out air temperature or the markers movement on the thorax/ abdominal region. Recently DDG techniques are developed to correct respiratory motion without the help of external motion tracking devices and to obtain a comparable result to that based on standard RG protocols.
RESULTS: The final result of an RG or DDG protocol is a sequence of 3D images showing organs and lesions movement; using the other motion management options a single 3D motion-free image is obtained without motion artefacts and degradation. Compared to the previously described options the BAM solution is not a real motion management protocol but just a Banana Artefact correction technique obtained using an Attenuation Correction Map calculated merging the Whole Body Helical CT with a Cine CT on the diaphragm area.
CONCLUSION: The motion management in PET/CT imaging shows benefits in terms of image quality, quantification and lesion detectability and it is useful both in diagnostic and radiotherapy planning. Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.org.
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Motion due to patient's breathing can introduce heavy bias in PET/CT, both in image quality and quantitation. This paper is a review of the main technical solutions available to manage movement in PET/CT studies: a) Respiratory Gated (RG), b) Motion Free (MF), c) End Expiration (EE), d) Banana Artefact Management (BAM) and e) Data Driven Gating (DDG).
METHODS: The most diffused solutions (RG, MF and EE) are based on LIST mode acquisition of a PET Field of View (4D FOV), centered on the anatomical region of interest; to link PET data not only to time and to spatial position but also to the corresponding breathing phase, the synchronized acquisition of the patient's breathing curve is performed by an external tracking device. Different commercial tools to track and to record patient breathing cycle are available to associate the internal organ motion with a measurable external parameter; for example these systems can measure the pressure on a chest elastic belt, the air flow trough patient nose, the breath-in and breath-out air temperature or the markers movement on the thorax/ abdominal region. Recently DDG techniques are developed to correct respiratory motion without the help of external motion tracking devices and to obtain a comparable result to that based on standard RG protocols.
RESULTS: The final result of an RG or DDG protocol is a sequence of 3D images showing organs and lesions movement; using the other motion management options a single 3D motion-free image is obtained without motion artefacts and degradation. Compared to the previously described options the BAM solution is not a real motion management protocol but just a Banana Artefact correction technique obtained using an Attenuation Correction Map calculated merging the Whole Body Helical CT with a Cine CT on the diaphragm area.
CONCLUSION: The motion management in PET/CT imaging shows benefits in terms of image quality, quantification and lesion detectability and it is useful both in diagnostic and radiotherapy planning. Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.org.
Entities:
Keywords:
PET field; PET/CT imaging; RG protocols; Respiratory gated; banana artefact management; data driven gating; end expiration; motion free.
Mesh：
Year: 2018
PMID： 29676240 DOI： 10.2174/1874471011666180419150440
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Radiopharm ISSN： 1874-4710