Literature DB >> 2967595

[Side effects of external ophthalmologic drugs].

P J Frosch1, R Weickel, T Schmitt, H Krastel.   

Abstract

43 patients with suspected adverse reactions to ophthalmic medicaments were tested using three different methods: normal patch test on back skin (ENH), patch test on stripped back skin (HSA) and on scarified skin of the forearm (SKT). The ENH was positive in only 9 patients (20.0%) with one of the used preparations whereas on stripped skin positive reactions were observed in another 14 patients (32.6%). The SKT was solely positive in 10 patients (23.7%). Clinical relevance of these test results has been ascertained in most cases. However, reactions on stripped skin as well as on scarified skin may be false positive. The antibiotics neomycin and gentamicin were the major allergens (13.9% and 9.3%). Some ophthalmic medicaments produced rather severe irritant reactions on scarified skin, confirmed by a positive conjunctival exposure test. In order to detect weak sensitizations or cumulative irritant reactions in patients with long term use of eye medicaments, the application of a method with increased sensitivity such as the patch test on stripped skin or the scarification technique is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2967595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Hautkr        ISSN: 0301-0481


  3 in total

1.  [Positive strip patch test reactions with coexistent negative patch test reactions. Relevance for the assessment practice of occupational skin disease].

Authors:  N Scola; N Hunzelmann; T Ruzicka; S Kobus; E Adamek; P Altmeyer; H Dickel
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  [Diagnosis and treatment of eyelid eczema. An interdisciplinary challenge].

Authors:  A Wollenberg; K Kerschenlohr; T Pavicic; E M Messmer
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Association of CD69 up-regulation on CD4+ Cla+ T cells versus patch test, strip patch test and clinical history in nickel sensitization.

Authors:  Heinrich Dickel; O Kuss; J Kamphowe; P Altmeyer; S Höxtermann
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.175

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.