Literature DB >> 29675890

The prevalence and potential determinants of dysmenorrhoea and other pelvic pain in women: a prospective study.

A Righarts1, L Osborne1, J Connor2, W Gillett1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of pelvic pain and model associations with potential demographic, obstetric, gynaecological and psychosocial determinants. DESIGN, SETTING AND SAMPLE: A cohort study of women born between 1972 and 1973 in Dunedin, New Zealand, most recently assessed when aged 38 years (95% of survivors retained); 429 women were eligible for analysis.
METHODS: Women self-completed reproductive health questionnaires at ages 21, 26, 32 and 38 years, with questions on dysmenorrhoea at ages 13 and 15, and on all pelvic pain at age 38. Prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and Poisson regression used to model associations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence of pain and adjusted relative risks (ARR) for potential explanatory factors.
RESULTS: Over half (54.5%, 95% CI 49.7-59.3%) of women experienced pelvic pain in the past 12 months at age 38. Dysmenorrhoea was reported by 46.2% (41.3-51.3%), dyspareunia by 11.6% (8.7-15.2%) and other pelvic pain (OPP) by 17.3% (13.8-21.2%). After adjusting for multiple factors, pregnancy (ARR 0.60, 95% CI 0.32-1.13) and childbirth (ARR 0.52, 95% CI 0.25-1.09) were borderline protective for dyspareunia and OPP, respectively. However, childbirth was not associated with dysmenorrhoea (ARR 0.97, 95% CI 0.74-1.28). Dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia were strongly associated, and both were associated with endometriosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that female pelvic pain is common, and suggest common gynaecological and obstetric causal pathways, but there was no strong evidence supporting a benefit of childbirth for dysmenorrhoea. Further research on obstetric events and pelvic pain is needed, with both being common experiences. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Pelvic pain was common at age 38, especially dysmenorrhoea (46.2%), and no improvement was detected following childbirth.
© 2018 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Determinants; dysmenorrhoea; pelvic pain; prevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29675890      PMCID: PMC6179916          DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  20 in total

Review 1.  Factors predisposing women to chronic pelvic pain: systematic review.

Authors:  Pallavi Latthe; Luciano Mignini; Richard Gray; Robert Hills; Khalid Khan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-16

2.  Chronic pelvic pain in women of reproductive and post-reproductive age: a population-based study.

Authors:  A A Ayorinde; S Bhattacharya; K L Druce; G T Jones; G J Macfarlane
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.931

3.  The community prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women and associated illness behaviour.

Authors:  K T Zondervan; P L Yudkin; M P Vessey; C P Jenkinson; M G Dawes; D H Barlow; S H Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Chronic pelvic pain in New Zealand: prevalence, pain severity, diagnoses and use of the health services.

Authors:  Victoria M Grace; Krina T Zondervan
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.939

5.  Sleep Fragmentation Hypersensitizes Healthy Young Women to Deep and Superficial Experimental Pain.

Authors:  Stella Iacovides; Kezia George; Peter Kamerman; Fiona C Baker
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 6.  The prevalence and risk factors of dysmenorrhea.

Authors:  Hong Ju; Mark Jones; Gita Mishra
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Heightened cold pain and pressure pain sensitivity in young female adults with moderate-to-severe menstrual pain.

Authors:  Helen Slater; Markus Paananen; Anne J Smith; Peter O'Sullivan; Andrew M Briggs; Martha Hickey; Jenny Mountain; Jaro Karppinen; Darren Beales
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 8.  Chronic pelvic pain.

Authors:  Fred M Howard
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  What we know about primary dysmenorrhea today: a critical review.

Authors:  Stella Iacovides; Ingrid Avidon; Fiona C Baker
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  The association of dysmenorrhea with noncyclic pelvic pain accounting for psychological factors.

Authors:  Allyson M Westling; Frank F Tu; James W Griffith; Kevin M Hellman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  3 in total

1.  An Open Trial of a Mind-Body Intervention for Young Women with Moderate to Severe Primary Dysmenorrhea.

Authors:  Laura A Payne; Laura C Seidman; Tamineh Romero; Myung-Shin Sim
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  The Impact of Dysmenorrhea on Quality of Life Among Spanish Female University Students.

Authors:  Elia Fernández-Martínez; María Dolores Onieva-Zafra; María Laura Parra-Fernández
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Prevalence of dysmenorrhea and associated factors among students in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alemayehu Molla; Bereket Duko; Bekahegn Girma; Derebe Madoro; Jemberu Nigussie; Zelalem Belayneh; Nebiyu Mengistu; Birhanie Mekuriaw
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.