| Literature DB >> 29675417 |
Kyung Ae Ko1, Yin Wang1, Sivareddy Kotla1, Yuka Fujii1, Hang Thi Vu1, Bhanu P Venkatesulu2, Tamlyn N Thomas1, Jan L Medina1, Young Jin Gi1, Megumi Hada3, Jane Grande-Allen4, Zarana S Patel5, Sarah A Milgrom2, Sunil Krishnan2, Keigi Fujiwara1, Jun-Ichi Abe1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The high incidence of cardiovascular events in cancer survivors has long been noted, but the mechanistic insights of cardiovascular toxicity of cancer treatments, especially for vessel diseases, remain unclear. It is well known that atherosclerotic plaque formation begins in the area exposed to disturbed blood flow, but the relationship between cancer therapy and disturbed flow in regulating plaque formation has not been well studied. Therefore, we had two goals for this study; (1) Generate an affordable, reliable, and reproducible mouse model to recapitulate the cancer therapy-induced cardiovascular events in cancer survivors, and (2) Establish a mouse model to investigate the interplay between disturbed flow and various cancer therapies in the process of atherosclerotic plaque formation. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Cancer treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity; atherosclerosis; disturbed blood flow; ionizing radiation; p90RSK
Year: 2018 PMID: 29675417 PMCID: PMC5896304 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Doxorubicin effect on plaque formation after PCL. All the animals did not show any clear health problem before each experiment. (A) The scheme of the study design of doxorubicin treatment and PCL. (B) Representative gross lesions from doxorubicin- or saline-treated groups after 3 weeks of PCL in Ldlr−/− mice. Left carotid artery is the right-side vessel (smaller of the two carotids) in each sample. (C) Gross lesion size after 3 weeks of PCL surgery (% lesion area of total LCA area). 5 males in doxorubicin-treated group and 3 males and 2 female in a vehicle group.
Figure 2Cisplatin treatment did not change the plaque size after PCL. All the animals did not show any clear health problem before each experiment. (A) The scheme of the study design of cisplatin treatment and PCL. (B) Changes in body weight after saline, cisplatin, and PCL surgery (mean ± SEM). (C) Representative gross lesions from cisplatin- and saline-treated groups after 3 weeks of PCL in Ldlr−/− mice. Scale bar, 0.5 cm. (D) Gross lesion size after 3 weeks of PCL surgery (% lesion area of total LCA area). 5 males and 3 females in both cisplatin and vehicle-treated groups.
Figure 3One week interval between IR treatment and PCL did not change the plaque size after PCL. All the animals did not show any clear health problem before each experiment. (A) The scheme of the study design of IR treatment and PCL. (B) Changes in the body weight after IR, or non-IR treated group and PCL surgery. (mean ± SEM) (C) Representative gross lesions from IR- or non-IR-treated groups after 3 weeks of PCL in Ldlr−/− mice. Scale bar, 0.5 cm. (D) Gross lesion size after 3 weeks of PCL surgery (% lesion area of total LCA area). 10 males in IR-treated group and 10 males on control non-IR group.
Figure 4Interval of 26 days between IR treatment and PCL accelerates plaque development after PCL. All the animals did not show any clear health problem before each experiment. (A) The scheme of the study design of IR treatment and PCL. (B) Changes in body weight in the IR and non-IR treatment groups. (mean ± SEM) (C) Representative gross lesions from the IR and non-IR treatment groups 3 weeks after PCL in Ldlr−/− mice. Scale bar, 0.5 cm. (D) Gross lesion size after 3 weeks of PCL surgery (% lesion area of total LCA area). (E-F) HDL and LDL levels in IR and non-IR treatment groups. 8 males in IR-treated group and 7 males in control group.
Figure 5Interval of 26 days between IR treatment and PCL enhanced the plaque size and vulnerable plaque formation detected in cross-sections. All the animals did not show any clear health problem before each experiment. (A) Atherosclerotic lesions 3 weeks after PCL in the left carotids isolated from the IR and non-IR treatment groups are shown. The unligated right carotid artery (RCA) from the same mouse is used as control (shown in lower panels of IR and control). Representative images are shown after H&E (left) and Masson trichrome (right) staining. Scale bars, 200 µm. (B) The intimal lesion area and the media area were determined in cross-sections of both ligated LCAs and control RCAs, and the ratio of (LCA intima + media)/RCA media was calculated. Data represent mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05. (C) Representative images of the necrotic core from the IR and non-IR treatment groups are shown after H&E staining. # denotes necrotic core. (D) Necrotic core formation was quantified by a grading system as described in the methods. 8 males in IR-treated group and 7 males in control group.
Figure 6Vascular smooth muscle cell and macrophage contents in lesions after partial carotid ligation. (A) LCA and RCA sections obtained from d-flow-induced atherosclerotic areas were immunostained with Mac3 (macrophages) or α-SMA (smooth muscle cells) antibodies. Representative immuno-histochemical images show macrophage infiltration into the intimal lesions in LCA but not in RCA. They also show that macrophage infiltration is accelerated in IR-treated mice. Scale bars, 200 µm. (B, C) The mean pixel intensities of α-SMA (B) and Mac3 (C) staining signals in the intima layer were measured as described in methods. Data represent mean ± SEM. 5 males in IR-treated group and 5 males in control group.
Figure 7Interval of 26 days between IR treatment and PCL accelerated both phosphorylation and expression of p90RSK after PCL. All the animals did not show any clear health problem before each experiment. (A, C) LCA sections after PCL were immuno-stained with anti-total-p90RSK (A) or anti-phopho-p90RSK antibody (C). Two representative images for total-p90RSK (A) and anti-phopho-p90RSK (C) in atherosclerotic lesions are shown. Note that the level of phosphorylation but not expression of p90RSK was increased in IR-treated mice compared to non-IR group. Scale bars, 200 µm. (B, D) Quantification of the mean pixel intensity of total p90RSK (B) and phosphorylated p90RSK (D) expression in the intima and media after PCL in non-IR and IR groups. Mean ± SD, *p < 0.05.