| Literature DB >> 29675008 |
Wei Chang1,2, Xin Sui2, Xiao-Xu Fan2, Ting-Ting Jia2, Fu-Qiang Song2.
Abstract
Elaeagnus angustifolia L. is a drought-resistant species. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis is considered to be a bio-ameliorator of saline soils that can improve salinity tolerance in plants. The present study investigated the effects of inoculation with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis on the biomass, antioxidant enzyme activities, and root, stem, and leaf ion accumulation of E. angustifolia seedlings grown during salt stress conditions. Salt-stressed mycorrhizal seedlings produced greater root, stem, and leaf biomass than the uninoculated stressed seedlings. In addition, the seedlings colonized by R. irregularis showed notably higher activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) in the leaves of the mycorrhizal seedlings in response to salinity compared to those of the non-mycorrhizal seedlings. Mycorrhizal seedlings not only significantly increased their ability to acquire K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+, but also maintained higher K+:Na+ ratios in the leaves and lower Ca2+:Mg2+ ratios than non-mycorrhizal seedlings during salt stress. These results suggest that the salt tolerance of E. angustifolia seedlings could be enhanced by R. irregularis. The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis could be a promising method to restore and utilize salt-alkaline land in northern China.Entities:
Keywords: Elaeagnus angustifolia L.; antioxidant enzyme; arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis; atomic absorbance spectrophotometer; dry weight; mineral nutrient; reactive oxygen species (ROS)
Year: 2018 PMID: 29675008 PMCID: PMC5895642 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00652
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
The effects of salt and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on the dry weight of roots, stems, and leaves of Elaeagnus angustifolia seedlings.
| Treatments | Root dry weight (g plant-1) | Stem dry weight (g plant-1) | Leaf dry weight (g plant-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 mmol/L | NM | 0.34 ± 0.10bc | 0.49 ± 0.08bc | 0.26 ± 0.02ab |
| M | 0.62 ± 0.13a | 0.78 ± 0.10a | 0.31 ± 0.04a | |
| 300 mmol/L | NM | 0.28 ± 0.04c | 0.44 ± 0.01c | 0.15 ± 0.04c |
| M | 0.38 ± 0.03b | 0.50 ± 0.05b | 0.23 ± 0.04b | |
| Salt | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | |
| Mycorrhizal | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | |
| Salt × Mycorrhizal | ∗ | ∗∗ | NS |
Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
| Parameter measured | Significance of sources of variation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Salt treatment (S) | Mycorrhizal (M) | M × S | |
| APX | ∗∗∗ | NS | ∗∗ |
| CAT | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗ |
| POD | ∗∗∗ | NS | NS |
| SOD | NS | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ |
| Root K+ concentration | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ |
| Stem K+ concentration | NS | ∗∗ | ∗∗ |
| Leaf K+ concentration | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ |
| Root Na+ concentration | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ |
| Stem Na+ concentration | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ |
| Leaf Na+ concentration | ∗∗∗ | ∗ | ∗∗∗ |
| Root Ca2+ concentration | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ |
| Stem Ca2+ concentration | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗∗ |
| Leaf Ca2+ concentration | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ |
| Root Mg2+ concentration | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗∗ |
| Stem Mg2+ Concentration | ∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ |
| Leaf Mg2+ concentration | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | NS |
| Root K+/Na+ ratio | ∗∗∗ | NS | NS |
| Stem K+/Na+ ratio | ∗∗∗ | NS | NS |
| Leaf K+/Na+ ratio | ∗∗∗ | NS | ∗∗ |
| Root Ca2+/Na+ ratio | ∗∗∗ | NS | NS |
| Stem Ca2+/Na+ ratio | ∗∗∗ | NS | NS |
| Leaf Ca2+/Na+ ratio | ∗∗∗ | NS | NS |
| Root Ca2+/Mg2+ ratio | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗∗ |
| Stem Ca2+/Mg2+ ratio | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗ |
| Leaf Ca2+/Mg2+ ratio | ∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ |