| Literature DB >> 29674994 |
Corey M Thibeault1, Samuel Thorpe1, Michael J O'Brien1, Nicolas Canac1, Mina Ranjbaran1, Ilyas Patanam1, Artin Sarraf2, James LeVangie1, Fabien Scalzo3, Seth J Wilk1, Ramon Diaz-Arrastia4, Robert B Hamilton1.
Abstract
The microvasculature is prominently affected by traumatic brain injury (TBI), including mild TBI (concussion). Assessment of cerebral hemodynamics shows promise as biomarkers of TBI, and may help inform development of therapies aimed at promoting neurologic recovery. The objective of this study was to assess the evolution in cerebral hemodynamics observable with transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound in subjects suffering from a concussion at different intervals during recovery. Pediatric subjects between the ages of 14 and 19 years clinically diagnosed with a concussion were observed at different points post-injury. Blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery was measured with TCD. After a baseline period, subjects participated in four breath holding challenges. Pulsatility index (PI), resistivity index (RI), the ratio of the first two pulse peaks (P2R), and the mean velocity (MV) were computed from the baseline section. The breath hold index (BHI) was computed from the challenge sections. TCD detected two phases of hemodynamic changes after concussion. Within the first 48 h, PI, RI, and P2R show a significant difference from the controls (U = -3.10; P < 0.01, U = -2.86; P < 0.01, and U = 2.62; P < 0.01, respectively). In addition, PI and P2R were not correlated (rp = -0.36; P = 0.23). After 48 h, differences in pulsatile features were no longer observable. However, BHI was significantly increased when grouped as 2-3, 4-5, and 6-7 days post-injury (U = 2.72; P < 0.01, U = 2.46; P = 0.014, and U = 2.38; P = 0.018, respectively). To our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study of concussions using TCD. In addition, these results are the first to suggest the multiple hemodynamic changes after a concussion are observable with TCD and could ultimately lead to a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology. In addition, the different hemodynamic responses to a concussion as compared to severe traumatic brain injuries highlight the need for specific diagnostic and therapeutic treatments of mild head injuries in adolescents.Entities:
Keywords: blood flow; cerebral blood flow autoregulation; cerebral blood flow velocity; traumatic brain injury; vascular reactivity
Year: 2018 PMID: 29674994 PMCID: PMC5895751 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Data collection for the mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) subjects. (A) Breakdown of the frequency that the subject population was scanned. (B) Scan times in days post-injury for each of the mTBI cases.
Figure 2Representative cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) signal over the course of the experimental protocol (black trace) with the filtered signal used for cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) calculations overlaid (blue trace). For CVR calculations, the baseline mean velocity (MVb) is computed over the period highlighted by the solid red line and the peak is velocity is computed from the breath hold period with the highest peak as illustrated by the red circle in BH1. The pulsatile analysis is computed using baseline pulses as illustrated by the inlay outlined by the solid vertical black lines. The systolic (P1), diastolic (D), and second peak (P2) are marked by the solid red circles.
Subject demographic and sport information.
| Control | Mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of exams | 109 | 187 |
| Number of subjects | 109 | 70 |
| Males | 97. 89% | 45. 64% |
| Mean age (SD) years | 16.06 (1.56) | 16.21 (1.16) |
| Past head hits | 1.03 (1.32) | 2.11 (3.50) |
| Football | 77 | 31 |
| Soccer | 8 | 12 |
| Other | 24 | 27 |
Statistical analysis of the presented results.
| Comparison | Δ | CL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population age | 0.18 | 70 | 109 | 0.86 | – | – |
| Self-reported past head hits | 3.51 | 69 | 64 | <0.01 | 1.00 | 0.57 |
| Pulsatility index, first 48 h | −3.10 | 109 | 11 | <0.01 | −0.113 | 0.78 |
| Resistivity index, first 48 h | −2.86 | 109 | 11 | <0.01 | −0.042 | 0.76 |
| P2R, first 48 h | 2.62 | 109 | 11 | <0.01 | 0.071 | 0.74 |
| Breath hold index (BHI), first 48 h | −0.42 | 109 | 11 | 0.67 | −1.79 | 0.46 |
| BHI, 2–3 days post-injury | 2.72 | 109 | 17 | <0.01 | 13.56 | 0.71 |
| BHI, 4–5 days post-injury | 2.46 | 109 | 23 | 0.014 | 6.54 | 0.66 |
| BHI, 6–7 days post-injury | 2.38 | 109 | 27 | 0.018 | 5.85 | 0.65 |
| BHI, 8–9 days post-injury | 1.83 | 109 | 23 | 0.067 | 4.59 | 0.62 |
| End-tidal CO2 after breath hold | −0.648 | 174 | 105 | 0.517 | −0.007 | 0.52 |
Exam statistics.
| Group (days post-injury) | Number of exams | Mean (SD) (days) |
|---|---|---|
| 0–1 | 11 | 0.73 (0.45) |
| 2–3 | 17 | 2.65 (0.48) |
| 4–5 | 23 | 4.57 (0.50) |
| 6–7 | 27 | 6.41 (0.49) |
| 8–9 | 23 | 8.35 (0.48) |
| 10–11 | 22 | 10.68 (0.47) |
| 12–13 | 16 | 12.62 (0.48) |
| 14–18 | 20 | 16.30 (1.31) |
| 19–30 | 28 | 23.86 (3.93) |
Figure 3(A–D) Pulsatile analysis of the baseline exam period over different days post-injury. (A) Pulsatility index (PI). (B) Resistivity index (RI). (C) P2 ratio. (D) Mean velocity (MV, cm/s). (E) Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) analysis—breath hold index (BHI). **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05. The dashed blue lines represent the control population mean with interquartile range marked by the surrounding dashed black lines.
Figure 4Correlation analysis between pulsatility index (PI) and P2R over different days post-injury. The linear fit, blue line, and r2 values are given for each set of values. Pearson’s r values are presented with corresponding P values in the upper right of each subplot.