Literature DB >> 29674936

The Manú Gradient as a study system for bird pollination.

Mannfred Ma Boehm1, Micah N Scholer1, Jeremiah Jc Kennedy1, Julian M Heavyside1, Aniceto Daza2, David Guevara-Apaza3, Jill E Jankowski4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study establishes an altiudinal gradient, spanning from the highland Andes (2400 m) to lowland Amazon, as a productive region for the study of bird pollination in Southeastern Peru. The 'Manú Gradient' has a rich history of ornithological research, the published data and resources from which lay the groundwork for analyses of plant-bird interactions. In this preliminary expedition we documented 44 plants exhibting aspects of the bird pollination syndrome, and made field observations of hummingbird visits at three sites spanning the Manú Gradient: 2800 m (Wayqecha), 1400 m (San Pedro), and 400 m (Pantiacolla). Some of the documented plant taxa are underrepresented in the bird pollination literature and could be promising avenues for future analyses of their pollination biology. The Manú Gradient is currently the focus of a concerted, international effort to describe and study the birds in the region; we propose that this region of Southeastern Peru is a productive and perhaps underestimated system to gain insight into the ecology and evolution of bird pollination. NEW INFORMATION: Observations were made on 11, 19, and 14 putatively bird pollinated plant species found at the high-, mid- and low-elevation sites along the gradient, respectively. Hummingbirds visited 18 of these plant species, with some plant species being visited by multiple hummingbird species or the same hummingbird species on differing occasions. Morphometric data is presented for putatively bird-pollinated plants, along with bill measurements from hummingbirds captured at each of three sites. Voucher specimens from this study are deposited in the herbaria of the Universidad Nacional de Agraria de La Molina (MOL), Peru and the University of British Columbia (UBC), Canada. The specimens collected represent a 'snapshot' of the diversity of bird-pollinated flora as observed over 10 day sampling windows (per site) during the breeding season for hummingbirds of Manú .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amazon; Andes; Hummingbirds; co-evolution; elevational gradient; neotropics; ornithophily; pollination ecology

Year:  2018        PMID: 29674936      PMCID: PMC5904515          DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.6.e22241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biodivers Data J        ISSN: 1314-2828


Introduction

Manú National Park is a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve nested within the most biodiverse region in the world: the tropical Andes (Myers et al. 2000). Manú Park, and its surrounding forests encompass a remarkable elevational gradient (hereafter the 'Manú Gradient') of over 3000 m, reaching from the lowland Amazon rainforest to the Puna grasslands of the high Andes. The Manú Gradient has a rich history of ornithological research (discussed in Walker et al. 2006), and over the last decade the Manú Gradient has been the focus of numerous ornithological studies as part of the Manú Bird Project (e.g. Merkord 2010, Jankowski et al. 2012a, Jankowski et al. 2012b, Londoño et al. 2014, Londoño et al. 2016, Dehling et al. 2014, Munoz 2016). Along the gradient, tree composition and forest structure have also been described (e.g. Jankowski et al. 2012b, Malhi et al. 2010, Hillyer and Silman 2010). The wide interest in the avian community of Manú make it an ideal system for studying hummingbird pollination: population structure, range limits, and locations of uncommon and understudied hummingbirds are described and published. For example, focused studies of the high elevation Shining Sunbeam () have demonstrated the effectiveness of the Manú Gradient as a study system for bird pollination (Hazlehurst et al. 2016, Hazlehurst and Karubian 2016). Therefore, the objectives of this study were to, 1) document the occurrence of putatively bird pollinated plants with voucher specimens along the Manú Gradient, 2) describe the occurrence and diversity of hummingbirds using mist-net surveys, and 3) record hummingbird visitations to flowering plants.

Materials and Methods

Site Selection We surveyed three field sites spanning an altitudinal gradient of 2400 m (400 m to 2800 m) in the southeastern Andes (Table 5): La Estación Biológica Wayqecha (Paucartambo Province, Cuzco Region, 2800 m), San Pedro (Paucartambo Province, Cuzco Region, 1400 m), and Pantiacolla (Manú Province, Madre de Dios Region, 400 m). This area is one of the most biologically rich regions in the world with an estimated species pool of nearly 1100 birds (Walker et al. 2006). To our knowledge, a comprehensive survey of the vascular plants of the region does not exist, although an increasing number of plant identification resources for this region are being made available by the Field Museum of Natural History (http://fieldguides.fieldmuseum.org). Wayqecha is characterized as high elevation cloud forest, with a mosaic of mature forest and areas with shorter trees and woody shrubs that transitions into puna grassland above treeline. San Pedro is predominately mid-montane humid rainforest, but also includes the lower extent of the montane cloud forest. Pantiacolla is situated at the interface between the Andean foothills and the lowland Amazon. Detailed environmental characteristics for these sites have been summarized in Malhi et al. (2016). Sampling was carried out between September 4, 2016 and October 13, 2016, falling within the avian montane breeding season. A distinct rainy season occurs from November through April and a dry season from May through August. Annual precipitation for higher elevations (2700-3000 m) ranges from 1700-2000 mm (Girardin et al. 2010) and is generally >2000 mm for lowland (100-400 m elevation) sites (Rapp and Silman 2012). Time constraints afforded less than two weeks (10.3 ± 2.1 days) for botanical and avian sampling at each site.
Table 5.

Summary information and site descriptions for three sampling points along the Manú Gradient.

Site (Latitude, Longitude)Period Collected and NettedAltitudinal Range Sampled (m asl)Number of Plants Species CollectedNumber of Hummingbirds NettedNumber of Hummingbird Species NettedNumber of Bird Visits RecordedGeneral Site Description
San Pedro(-13.055387, -71.546832)4-ix-2016 to 16-ix-20161149 - 15471976147Montane cloud forest, Cecropia readily found in disturbed habitats. Dominant palm is Wettinia and canopy is generally composed of Clusiaceae, Rubiaceae, Melastomataceae and Lauraceae (Weng et al. 2004).
Wayqecha(-13.1752615, -71.5884099)20-ix-2016 to 03-x-20162625 - 297911651510Highland cloud forest and puna grassland of mainly Asteraceae and Poaceae. Oreocalis grandiflora is a noteable and abundant tree species. Araliaceae, Cunoniaceae,Chloranthaceae, Myrsinaceae, Sabiaceae, and Symplocaceae are readily found (Weng et al. 2004).
Pantiacolla(-12.656544, -71.231862)07-x-2016 to 13-x-2016391 - 428143198Lowland rainforest, includes both seasonally flooded and terra firme forests. Canopy dominated by Fabaceae, Malvaceae, Moraceae and Annonaceae (Weng et al. 2004, Weng et al. 2004)
Data Collection Pre-cut singletrack trails were used to access sampling areas away from the Manú Road (main access road that runs along the southeastern border of Manú National Park). We sampled hummingbirds using standard (12 x 3 m, 34 mm mesh) mist-nets along trail systems only. Mist-netting sites were sampled during the primary breeding season (August–November) for two consecutive days from approximately 0600–1200 hrs during suitable weather conditions (i.e., no periods of extended heavy rain, high winds, or other situations that could compromise researcher or bird safety). Each site consisted of an array of ten to fifteen nets placed in forested and open habitat and spaced at intervals of 25-50 m. Ten sites were sampled at Wayqecha and San Pedro, and 8 sites were sampled at Pantiacolla. Hummingbird bill length was measured from the bill tip to the nares. Bill width was measured from the anterior edge of the nares. All captured hummingbirds were marked by cutting the terminal 1-2 cm of one rectrix to avoid resampling of individuals. Both trails and the Manú Road were used to opportunistically collect plants. Plants were considered putatively bird pollinated if they met criteria adhering to typical bird pollination ‘syndromes’; namely, dilute nectar and long tubular flowers (Fenster et al. 2004), though we acknowledge the limitations of surveying by these critera (Ollerton et al. 2009). Plants of interest were photographed, their location marked using a hand-held Garmin 64s global positioning system, and a description of the immediate habitat recorded. We then measured nectar concentration of mature flowers (Sper Scientific no. 66214-988), recorded corolla dimensions and colour (by visual inspection), and processed each plant using standard herbarium techniques Bridson and Forman 2000) (SERFOR collection permit no. 343-2016). All dried and pressed specimens are deposited at the herbaria of the Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina (MOL), Peru and the University of British Columbia (UBC), Canada (SERFOR export permit no. 09125-2017).

Results

We identified 44 putatively bird pollinated plants of interest belonging to 16 families (Table 1, Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Corolla length and width of sampled plants ranged from 8-120 mm (x̅ = 39.7 ± 27.4, n = 42) and 1-60 mm (x̅ = 11.4 ± 12.2), respectively. We measured nectar concentration for 11 of these species. In each case, nectar concentrations fell within a typical bird pollination syndrome (Stiles 1978, Fenster et al. 2004), ranging from 12-25.5% (Table 1). Corolla colour and immediate habitat characteristics were recorded for each plant (Table 1, see also Table 5).
Table 1.

Putatively bird pollinated plants along the Manú Gradient.

Plant GenusSpecific epithetFamilyCollection number(s) for plant specimens deposited in the herbaria of MOL and UBCCorolla length (mm)Corolla width (mm)Nectar (% sugar, * = not recorded)Corolla colour(s)Hummingbird visitedHabitat notes
Besleria L.sp. 1 Gesneriaceae MMAB 181*redGrowing along trail's edge in relatively open canopy
Heliconia L.sp. 1 Heliconiaceae MMAB 10, 1110019*translucent with pinkLowest point of a bog with little shade. Pioneering Cecropia and Schefflera are dominating species. Ruellia also abundant.
Centropogon granulosus C. Presl Campanulaceae MMAB 12, 134015*yellow within red bractAlong ditches of the Manu Road. Typically at points facing South-East. Relatively dry forest edge.
Centropogon granulosus C. Presl Campanulaceae MMAB 2, 3351525.5red and yellowVine growing through dense understory at 1-3 m. Guaduais abundant. Flowers at breaks in the canopy where sunlight is more abundant.
Sanchezia Ruiz & Pav.sp. 1 Acanthaceae MMAB 20, 21705*yellow within red bractAlong ditches of the Manu Road. Grows along weedy species including Vernonia, Calceolaria, and Gloxinia
Columnea guttata Poepp. & Endl. Gesneriaceae MMAB 22, 2310120yellowEpiphytic. Found readily in the same habitats as that of Columnea sp. 1
Heliconia subulata Ruiz & Pav. Heliconiaceae MMAB 24, 444010*bright yellow in dark red bractFound in dense stand of Guadua. Little sunlight, relatively dry.
Guzmania weberbaueri Mez Bromeliaceae MMAB 25, 26377*yellowColibri thalassinus, Doryfera ludovicae, Heliodoxa leadbeateriGrows both as an epiphyte and from the ground. Always in high-moisture environments including bogs but less common near river's edge.
Columnea cf. inaequilatera Poepp. & Endl. Gesneriaceae MMAB 27, 2844921.5redEdge of fast-flowing rocky river with little shade.
Thyrsacanthus Moricsp. 1 Acanthaceae MMAB 29, 3010122.5red-purpleAlong ditch of the Manu Road. East-facing, well drained.
Gurania eriantha Poepp. & Endl. Cucurbitaceae MMAB 33***redAlong ditch of the Manu Road. Growing through dense vegetation, flowers at edge.
Drymonia semicordata (Poepp.) Wiehler Gesneriaceae MMAB 34, 35102*yellow within red bractHanging over edge of fast-flowing rocky river. Shaded by various Araceae.
Besleria L.sp. 1 Gesneriaceae MMAB 36, 37208*bright redWet, dark, steep rocky cliff. North facing.
Drymonia urceolata Wiehler Gesneriaceae MMAB 40, 39205*redWet, dark, steep rocky cliff. North facing.
Erythrina L.sp. 1 Fabaceae MMAB 42, 41***orange-redFlowers found on ground at the lowest point of a bog with little shade.
Passiflora coccinea Aubl. Passifloraceae MMAB 43, 381206022.5redUnidentifiedGrowing from 0-12 m through dense stand of Guadua.
Centropogon congestus Gleason Campanulaceae MMAB 453210*pink-redDense stand of Guadua. Relatively humid and little light.
Oreocallis grandiflora (Lam.) R. Br. Proteaceae MMAB 49, 484612*red-purpleAglaeactis cupripenni, Boissonneaua matthewsiiDominating tree species in dry, scrubby, elfin forest.
Siphocampylus scandens (Kunth) G.Don Campanulaceae MMAB 50, 5147816pink Adelomyia melanogenys Along ditch of the Manu Road. Grows indiscriminately in sun or shade.
Siphocampylus orbignianus A.DC. Campanulaceae MMAB 52, 53541712pink-redCoeligena sp.Along ditch of the Manu Road. Grows indiscriminately in sun or shade.
Brachyotum rostratum (Naudin) Triana Melastomataceae MMAB 54, 5519713red with yellow tip Aglaeactis cupripenni Dry scrubby elfin forest. Dead ferns make up dense mat up to 1 m.
Aetanthus nodosus (Desr.) Engl. Loranthaceae MMAB 56, 5770514.5dark purpleCoeligena sp.Humid transitional forest at where elfin forest dimishes.
Gaultheria Kalm ex L.sp. 1 Ericaceae MMAB 58, 5973*red with yellow tipAglaeactis cupripenni, Metallura tyrianthinaEdge of pond alongside other Ericaceae species. Abundant light, south facing.
Miconia Ruiz & Pavónsp. 1 Melastomataceae MMAB 6, 71513*pink Heliodoxa leadbeateri 3 m tree mostly shaded by Cecropia and other taller species.
Passiflora mixta L.f. Passifloraceae MMAB 60, 6111845*white-pink Ensifera ensifera Growing through same habitat as Ericaceae gen. sp. 1 and 2. Flowers at breaks in the canopy.
Fuchsia L.sp. 1 Onagraceae MMAB 63, 626545*bright pinkHumid, dark understory. Habitat tends to be rocky.
Desmodium Desv.sp. 1 Fabaceae MMAB 64, 65201916.5light red-orangeMetallura sp.Rocky exposed cliffside. Many ferns. Dry.
Siphonandra Klotzschsp. 1 Ericaceae MMAB 66, 67185*purple Aglaeactis cupripenni Edge of pond alongside other Ericaceae species. Abundant light, south facing.
Bomarea Mirb.sp. 1 Alstroemeriaceae MMAB 68, 6918718.5red with white tipRocky cliff next to slow-flowing river. In dense vegetation including Rubus and Asteraceae spp.
Drymonia semicordata (Poepp.) Wiehler Gesneriaceae MMAB 70, 714017*yellow within red bractGlaucis hirsutus, Heliodoxa aurescens, Phaethornis sp.Ubiquitous throughout humid lowland forest.
Pachystachys Neessp. 1 Acanthaceae MMAB 72608*redIn the shade of tall trees at trail's edge.
Costus L.sp. 3 Costaceae MMAB 75, 74305*yellowRelatively common at trail's edge, even in low light.
Heliconia densiflora Verl. Heliconiaceae MMAB 76, 77477*orange within red bractHigh moisture depression in humid forest. Medium shade.
Costus L.sp. 2 Costaceae MMAB 78, 79397*yellow within red bractTerra firma approx 300 m from Rio Madre de Dios
Columnea aff. schimpfii Mansf. Gesneriaceae MMAB 8, 9305*whiteEpiphytic. Can be found indiscriminately on any trees from at least 1-8 m.
Besleria L.sp. 4 Gesneriaceae MMAB 80, 81228*redTerra firma approx 300 m from Rio Madre de Dios
Heliconia schumanniana Loes. Heliconiaceae MMAB 82, 83445*yellow within red bractAbundant sunlight at clearning in forest.
Heliconia lingulata Ruiz & Pav. Heliconiaceae MMAB 84, 85374*yellow within yellow bractSouth-facing clay bank of the Alto Madre de Dios.
Besleria L.sp. 2 Gesneriaceae MMAB 86, 87199*orangeUnidentifiedTerra firma approx 300 m from Rio Madre de Dios
Besleria L.sp. 3 Gesneriaceae MMAB 88, 89154*orangeUnidentifiedRelatively exposed at trail's edge. Dense cluster of upto 20 individuals.
Heliconia metallica Planch. & Linden ex Hook. Heliconiaceae MMAB 90, 91404*redPhaethornis sp.High moisture depression in humid forest. Medium shade.
Pentagonia Benth.sp. 1 Rubiaceae MMAB 93, 923110*yellow within red bractUnidentifiedHigh moisture depression in humid forest. Medium shade.
Passiflora L.sp. 1 Passifloraceae MMAB 94, 9580mm long, pre-anthesis**redGrowing through dense understory including Melastomaceae.
Pachystachys Neessp. 2 Acanthaceae MMAB 96, 975017*redPhaethornis sp.Relatively exposed at trail's edge.
We recorded 23 hummingbird visitations to 18 plant taxa belonging to 12 plant families (Table 2). Bill length and width of sampled hummingbirds ranged from 11.5-39.6 mm (x̅ = 24.3 ± 7.6, n = 41) and 2.5-3.0 mm (x̅ = 2.9 ± 0.4, n = 40), respectively (Figs 6, 7, 8, Table 3).
Table 2.

Records of hummingbird-plant visitation along the Manú Gradient.

Hummingbird SpeciesPlant visitedPlant FamilyCollection numberSite
Adelomyia melanogenys Bonaparte Siphocampylus scandens Campanulaceae MMAB 50San Pedro
Aglaeactis cupripennis BourcierGaultheria sp. 1 Ericaceae MMAB 58Wayqecha
Aglaeactis cupripennis Siphonandra sp. 1 Ericaceae MMAB 66Wayqecha
Aglaeactis cupripennis Brachyotum rostratum Melastomataceae MMAB 54Wayqecha
Aglaeactis cupripennis Oreocallis grandiflora Proteaceae MMAB 49Wayqecha
Boissonneaua matthewsii Bourcier Oreocallis grandiflora Proteaceae MMAB 49Wayqecha
Coeligena sp. Siphocampylus orbignianus Campanulaceae MMAB 52Wayqecha
Coeligena sp. Aetanthus nodosus Loranthaceae MMAB 56Wayqecha
Colibri thalassinus Swainson Guzmania weberbaueri Bromeliaceae MMAB 25San Pedro
Doryfera ludovicae Bourcier & Mulsant Guzmania weberbaueri Bromeliaceae MMAB 25San Pedro
Ensifera ensifera Lesson Passiflora mixta Passifloraceae MMAB 60Wayqecha
Glaucis hirsutus Gmelin Drymonia semicordata Gesneriaceae MMAB 70Pantiacolla
Heliodoxa aurescens Gould Drymonia semicordata Gesneriaceae MMAB 70Pantiacolla
Heliodoxa leadbeateri BourcierMiconia sp.1 Melastomataceae MMAB 6San Pedro
Heliodoxa leadbeateri Guzmania weberbaueri Bromeliaceae MMAB 25San Pedro
Metallura tyrianthina Loddiges Brachyotum rostratum Melastomataceae MMAB 54Wayqecha
Metallura sp.Desmodium sp. 1 Fabaceae MMAB 64Wayqecha
Metallura tyrianthina Gaultheria sp. 1 Ericaceae MMAB 58Wayqecha
Phaethornis sp.Pachystachys sp. 2 Acanthaceae MMAB 96Pantiacolla
Phaethornis sp. Drymonia semicordata Gesneriaceae MMAB 70Pantiacolla
Phaethornis sp. Heliconia metallica Heliconiaceae MMAB 90Pantiacolla
Unidentified TrochilidaeBesleria sp. 2 Gesneriaceae MMAB 86Pantiacolla
Unidentified TrochilidaeBesleria sp. 3 Gesneriaceae MMAB 88Pantiacolla
Unidentified Trochilidae Passiflora coccinea Passifloraceae MMAB 43San Pedro
Unidentified TrochilidaePentagonia sp. 1 Rubiaceae MMAB 93Pantiacolla
Table 3.

Basic bill morphometrics from birds mist-netted along the Manú Gradient.

SpeciesSex(F=Female, M=Male, U=Unknown)Mean bill length (mm)Bill length std dev (mm)Mean bill width (mm)Bill width std dev (mm)Bill length sample sizeBill width sample size
Adelomyia melanogenys F14.551.342.7022
Adelomyia melanogenys U14.561.102.440.1899
Aglaeactis cupripennis U18.061.052.640.1155
Boissonneaua matthewsii BourcierU18.4NA2.9NA11
Chalcostigma ruficeps GouldF11.5NA2NA11
Chalcostigma ruficeps M11.91.272.20.1422
Chlorostilbon mellisugus LinnaeusF20.5NA2.7NA11
Coeligena coeligena LessonU29.473.302.650.21910
Coeligena torquata BoissonneauM32.41.92.660.2033
Coeligena torquata F36.2NA3NA11
Coeligena violifer GouldU31.744.783.220.2555
Coeligena violifer M33.130.983.260.2533
Coeligena violifer F35.51.43.30.3544
Colibri coruscans GouldU24.052.893.060.1523
Colibri thalassinus U21.461.7230.1733
Doryfera johannae BourcierF26.2NA3NA11
Doryfera ludovicae U27.627.902.750.1478
Doryfera ludovicae M30.8NA2.6NA11
Doryfera ludovicae F31.212.50.2633
Eutoxeres condamini BourcierU24.231.523.870.6887
Florisuga mellivora LinnaeusF18.1NA2.6NA11
Florisuga mellivora M18.70.283.450.4922
Glaucis hirsutus M28.9NA3.3NA11
Glaucis hirsutus U29.151.213.820.2944
Heliangelus amethysticollis d'Orbigny & LafresnayeM17.460.692.460.2966
Heliangelus amethysticollis U18.5NA2.5NA11
Heliangelus amethysticollis F18.650.212.80.1422
Heliodoxa leadbeateri M20.560.992.950.0566
Heliodoxa leadbeateri U20.8NA3.2NA11
Heliodoxa leadbeateri F22.270.823.20.1644
Ocreatus underwoodii LessonF15.6NA2.5NA11
Ocreatus underwoodii M15.8NA2.20.8412
Ocreatus underwoodii U15.8NANANA10
Phaethornis guy LessonF38.051.903.30.4222
Phaethornis guy U39.6NA3NA11
Phaethornis koepckeae Weske & TerborghU34.52.093.7250.1744
Phaethornis superciliosus LinnaeusU35.432.193.650.5866
Thalurania furcata GmelinF20.70.553.20.4533
Thalurania furcata M23.654.033.550.4922
Thalurania furcata U24.66.223.250.2122
Threnetes leucurus U28.520.993.6750.2244
Diversity of plants exhibiting the bird pollination syndrome does not differ across the gradient in the time frame sampled (Table 4).
Table 4.

Site information for putatively bird pollinated plants along the Manú Gradient

Collection numbersSiteLatitudeLongitudeAltitude (m a.s.l.)Date
MMAB 1San Pedro -13.056864 -71.546146 13474-ix-2016
MMAB 2, 3San Pedro -13.057179 -71.546566 14024-ix-2016
MMAB 6, 7San Pedro -13.057697 -71.547385 13934-ix-2016
MMAB 8, 9San Pedro -13.057311 -71.547086 14114-ix-2016
MMAB 10, 11San Pedro -13.058199 -71.547978 14034-ix-2016
MMAB 12, 13San Pedro -13.057907 -71.548086 13574-ix-2016
MMAB 20, 21San Pedro -13.054945 -71.545872 13786-ix-2016
MMAB 22, 23San Pedro -13.056268 -71.546039 13946-ix-2016
MMAB 24, 44San Pedro -13.05637 -71.54609 13557-ix-2016
MMAB 25, 26San Pedro -13.058848 -71.547884 13307-ix-2016
MMAB 27, 28San Pedro -13.059836 -71.54739 13607-ix-2016
MMAB 29, 30San Pedro -13.058044 -71.549996 12698-ix-2016
MMAB 33San Pedro -13.05773 -71.548458 14398-ix-2016
MMAB 34, 35San Pedro -13.057514 -71.543293 13248-ix-2016
MMAB 36, 37San Pedro -13.05634 -71.541812 15479-ix-2016
MMAB 40, 39San Pedro -13.054006 -71.539007 12979-ix-2016
MMAB 43, 38San Pedro -13.058459 -71.548074 136310-ix-2016
MMAB 42, 41San Pedro -13.058199 -71.547978 140311-ix-2016
MMAB 45San Pedro -13.191861 -71.588599 114916-ix-2016
MMAB 49, 48Wayqecha -13.173428 -71.587187 272720-ix-2016
MMAB 50, 51Wayqecha -13.17706 -71.586071 293921-ix-2016
MMAB 52, 53Wayqecha -13.179536 -71.585172 295821-ix-2016
MMAB 54, 55Wayqecha -13.180133 -71.585235 295522-ix-2016
MMAB 56, 57Wayqecha -13.174448 -71.587465 288826-ix-2016
MMAB 58, 59Wayqecha -13.176716 -71.581308 262526-ix-2016
MMAB 60, 61Wayqecha -13.174771 -71.588345 286627-ix-2016
MMAB 63, 62Wayqecha -13.174751 -71.588335 290427-ix-2016
MMAB 64, 65Wayqecha -13.191716 -71.586709 283428-ix-2016
MMAB 66, 67Wayqecha -13.18732 -71.585754 297928-ix-2016
MMAB 68, 69Wayqecha -13.173166 -71.591911 278029-ix-2016
MMAB 70, 71Pantiacolla -12.656352 -71.230691 3986-x-2016
MMAB 72Pantiacolla -12.655418 -71.229373 3917-x-2016
MMAB 75, 74Pantiacolla -12.656351 -71.230732 3968-x-2016
MMAB 76, 77Pantiacolla -12.64719 -71.240662 3948-x-2016
MMAB 78, 79Pantiacolla -12.645874 -71.234135 4109-x-2016
MMAB 80, 81Pantiacolla -12.65622 -71.231045 4049-x-2016
MMAB 82, 83Pantiacolla -12.656216 -71.230678 4049-x-2016
MMAB 84, 85Pantiacolla -12.656545 -71.231864 40511-x-2016
MMAB 86, 87Pantiacolla -12.656431 -71.231836 39611-x-2016
MMAB 88, 89Pantiacolla -12.650034 -71.225302 42812-x-2016
MMAB 90, 91Pantiacolla -12.651347 -71.22389 39112-x-2016
MMAB 93, 92Pantiacolla -12.65138 -71.223853 39712-x-2016
MMAB 94, 95Pantiacolla -12.651421 -71.223706 42313-x-2016
MMAB 96, 97Pantiacolla -12.651113 -71.223842 39413-x-2016

Discussion

Hummingbird pollination is common and well-established in Neotropical montane and lowland environments. Our observations and collected specimens exemplify that bird-plant interactions are readily observed along the Manú Gradient - an area that is relatively accessible has been subject to only a handful of studies on hummingbird pollination (, ; Hazlehurst et al. 2016, Hazlehurst and Karubian 2016). Along the gradient, putatively bird pollinated plants were generally characterized by long corollas and were predominantly coloured red, yellow, orange, or some combination thereof. Previous documentation of bird pollination exists for each of the 16 families collected (Cronk and Ojeda 2008, Johnson and Nicolson 2008), but undocumented species-level bird pollination systems may arise from focusing on lesser-stuided taxa (e.g. , , ). Many putatively bird pollinated plants contained too little nectar to effectively measure sugar concentration at the time of sampling. We suspect that early morning visitations by nectarivorous birds and insects (i.e., both pollinators and nectar robbers) influenced this outcome. Indeed, in some cases inspection of certain plants revealed that the flower had been recently robbed as indicated by punctures at the base of the corolla. In as little as bird pollination has been studied along the Manú Gradient, even less is known of the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of nectary robbery. As this survey was preliminary, time did not allow for multi-day sampling at one locale to isolate nectar. A focus on a specific plant taxon would allow familiarity for nectar phenology and hence, more effective collection of nectar. We recorded 23 independent visits by hummingbirds to 19 different plant taxa over 33 days. These observations by no means represent a comprehensive list of the total diversity for hummingbirds (Walker et al. 2006), bird-pollinated plants, or the interactions between these two groups. An estimate of total diversity will come only with an extended sampling effort at each site. Relatively few hummingbirds were captured or observed in the lowlands (Table 3) compared to the other two sites. It is likely that this resulted from differences in foraging behavior between hummingbird species, rather than local abundance. For example, in the lowlands, a higher proportion of hummingbirds (e.g. ) exhibit traplining behaviour (i.e. repeated visits along a route of flowering locations) compared to territorial guarding of floral resources. In addition, because of the higher canopy, many of the trees, lianas, and epiphytes inhabit canopy heights that are logistically difficult to sample. The number of plants exhibiting bird pollination syndrome and number of bird visits observed are comparable between sites. That is, at a coarse scale we did not find any indication that elevation affects the absolute diversity of bird pollinated plant taxa (as expected by Cruden 1972), although the Manú Gradient would be an ideal location to test the hypothesis that bird and insect pollinated plants occupy distinct ecological niches. Between species, corolla length and width encompasses a great amount of variation, but hummingbird bill morphology varies less Tables 1, 3. This may speak to the adaptability of flowers relative to bills. It may be that because flowers serve a singular purpose (attraction and exclusion of pollinators and robbers, respectively), whereas bills have many uses (feeding, aggression, preening, balance), that bill evolution is relatively constrained. Bill morphology data will be used to inform phylogenetic tests of bill-flower shape evolution in future studies. Evaluating the extent to which plants and their pollinators contribute to maintaining local biodiversity, and identifying keystone species within these systems (Ebenman and Jonsson 2005) will be important to maintaining ecological and cultural heritage in the Manú region (Ministerio del Ambiente (Ministry of Environment) 2017). This study provides a baseline for future work in pollination ecology along the Manú Gradient. Any one of the 44 plant species highlighted here warrants closer investigation, and we anticipate that further studies will help clarify the roles of hummingbirds as pollinators for the plant taxa described herein..
  7 in total

1.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

Authors:  N Myers; R A Mittermeier; C G Mittermeier; G A da Fonseca; J Kent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Using community viability analysis to identify fragile systems and keystone species.

Authors:  Bo Ebenman; Tomas Jonsson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Evolutionary associations between nectar properties and specificity in bird pollination systems.

Authors:  Steven D Johnson; Susan W Nicolson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  Bird-pollinated flowers in an evolutionary and molecular context.

Authors:  Quentin Cronk; Isidro Ojeda
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  A global test of the pollination syndrome hypothesis.

Authors:  Jeff Ollerton; Ruben Alarcón; Nickolas M Waser; Mary V Price; Stella Watts; Louise Cranmer; Andrew Hingston; Craig I Peter; John Rotenberry
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Pollinators in high-elevation ecosystems: relative effectiveness of birds and bees.

Authors:  R W Cruden
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The variation of productivity and its allocation along a tropical elevation gradient: a whole carbon budget perspective.

Authors:  Yadvinder Malhi; Cécile A J Girardin; Gregory R Goldsmith; Christopher E Doughty; Norma Salinas; Daniel B Metcalfe; Walter Huaraca Huasco; Javier E Silva-Espejo; Jhon Del Aguilla-Pasquell; Filio Farfán Amézquita; Luiz E O C Aragão; Rossella Guerrieri; Françoise Yoko Ishida; Nur H A Bahar; William Farfan-Rios; Oliver L Phillips; Patrick Meir; Miles Silman
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 10.151

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Increased resolution in the face of conflict: phylogenomics of the Neotropical bellflowers (Campanulaceae: Lobelioideae), a rapid plant radiation.

Authors:  Laura P Lagomarsino; Lauren Frankel; Simon Uribe-Convers; Alexandre Antonelli; Nathan Muchhala
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.040

2.  Floral phenology of an Andean bellflower and pollination by buff-tailed sicklebill hummingbird.

Authors:  Mannfred M A Boehm; David Guevara-Apaza; Jill E Jankowski; Quentin C B Cronk
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 3.167

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.