| Literature DB >> 29674805 |
Dominika Thiem1, Agnieszka Piernik2, Katarzyna Hrynkiewicz1.
Abstract
<Entities:
Keywords: Alnus glutinosa L.; black alder; ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF); saline stress; salinity
Year: 2017 PMID: 29674805 PMCID: PMC5899101 DOI: 10.1007/s13199-017-0512-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Symbiosis ISSN: 0334-5114 Impact factor: 2.268
Results of the analysis of soil properties (mean ± standard deviation) and Kruskal – Wallis test with the Dunn post hoc comparisons for the five positions (I–V)
| Plots | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | V |
| |
| ECe (dS·m-1) | 2.54 | 3.58 | 5.46 | 5.62 | 6.85 | - |
| EC1:5 (dS·m-1) | 403 ± 6 a | 486 ± 26 ab | 760 ± 30 b | 466 ± 12 ab | 533 ± 21ab | 0.01 |
| Cle (mg·dm-1) | 717 ± 14 a | 1000 ± 25 ab | 1725 ± 25 ab | 1867 ± 14 b | 2225 ± 50 ab | 0.01 |
| pHe | 7.8 | 7.5 | 6.7 | 4.8 | 7.5 | - |
| pH1:5 | 7.15 ± 0.03 b | 7.05 ± 0.01 ab | 6.58 ± 0.05 ab | 5.66 ± 0.05 a | 6.73 ± 0.03 ab | 0.01 |
| OM (%) | 11.46 ± 0.08 b | 8.06 ± 0.02 ab | 10.01 ± 0.14 ab | 4.80 ± 0.04 ab | 3.24 ± 0.01a | 0.01 |
| C (%) | 4.96 ± 0.10 b | 4.38 ± 0.05 ab | 3.91 ± 0.09 ab | 2.33 ± 0.02 ab | 1.79 ± 0.02 a | 0.01 |
| Nt (%) | 0.386 ± 0.006 b | 0.352 ± 0.002 ab | 0.305 ± 0.007 ab | 0.195 ± 0.002 ab | 0.141 ± 0.003 a | 0.01 |
| P (mg·kg-1) | 51.4 ± 1.1 b | 50.4 ± 1.2 ab | 36.7 ± 0.7 ab | 31.4 ± 0.7 a | 34.8 ± 0.5 ab | 0.01 |
| P2O5 ca (mg·kg-1) | 118.7 ± 2.5 b | 116.4 ± 2.8 ab | 84.8 ± 1.5 ab | 72.4 ± 1.6 a | 80.4 ± 1.3 ab | 0.01 |
| M (%) | 64.9 ± 13.0 a | 69.2 ± 4.7 a | 57.4 ± 10.1 a | 36.4 ± 6.1 a | 35.3 ± 6.8 a | ns |
| SP (%) | 68.3 ± 2.2 b | 67.1 ± 1.3 ab | 65.1 ± 1.2 ab | 42.7 ± 1.0 ab | 38.6 ± 1.4 a | 0.01 |
| M:SP | 0.95 ± 0.19 a | 1.03 ± 0.04 a | 0.88 ± 0.15 a | 0.85 ± 0.17 a | 0.91 ± 0.15 a | ns |
Variants labelled with the same letters are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05)
Abbreviations: EC , electrical conductivity of the saturated extract; EC , electrical conductivity in 1:5 soil to water extract; Cl , chloride content in saturated extract; pH , reaction in saturated extract; pH , reaction in 1:5 soil to water extract; OM, organic matter content; C, organic carbon; N , total nitrogen; P, phosphorus content; P O ca, phosphorus soluble in citric acid; ns, not significant
Fig. 1Ectomycorrhizal (EM) and non-mycorrhizal (NM) fine root tips (%, mean ± Std dev.) of A. glutinosa at the five tested plots (I–V) (p ≤ 0.05). Variants labelled with the same letters are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) (Kruskal – Wallis and Dunn test as a post hoc comparison)
Fig. 2Redundancy Analysis, diagram with axes 1 and 2 for the level of EM colonization of A. glutinosa in the five plots (I–V) and the soil properties in the rhizosphere. Abbreviations as in Table 1
Fig. 3The phylogenetic tree of identified fungal morphotypes isolated from roots of A. glutinosa in a saline area
Fig. 4The percentage contribution of fungal classes isolated from the five tested plots (I–V)
Fig. 5Redundancy Analysis, diagram with axes 1 and 2 for percentage of fungal symbionts A. glutinosa was distinguished at the class level on the basis of molecular identification at the five plots (I–V) and the soil properties in the rhizosphere. Abbreviations as in Tab. 1. * p ≤ 0.05
Measurements of diversity for the plots analysed (I-V) (average ± SD) and ANOVA with the Tukey post hoc comparisons for the five positions (I–V)
| plot | I | II | III | IV | V | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | 2.667 ± 0.578 ab | 4.667 ± 1.155 c | 1.333 ± 0.578 a | 4.000 ± 0.000 bc | 1.667 ± 0.557 a | 0,00049 |
| H′ | 0.913 ± 0.227 bc | 1.434 ± 0.214 c | 0.586 ± 0.338 a | 1.044 ± 0.084 bc | 0.522 ± 0.095 ab | 0,00026 |
Variants labelled with the same letters are not significantly different (p ≤ 0.05)
Abbreviations: S, species richness; H′ – Shannon - Wiener diversity index
Fig. 6Correlation between species richness (S) and the level of salinity (ECe1:5) (n = 15; r = −0.5395; p = 0.038)
Fig. 7Correlation between the level of diversity (described by H′ index) and salinity (ECe1:5) (n = 15; r = -0.6814; p = 0.050)