Saskia Roesch1,2, Thomas Lindner3, Max Sauter3,4, Anastasia Loktev5, Paul Flechsig6, Martin Müller5, Walter Mier3, Rolf Warta1,2, Gerhard Dyckhoff1, Christel Herold-Mende1,2, Uwe Haberkorn3,5, Annette Altmann7,5. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 2. Division of Experimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 4. Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 5. Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; and. 6. Department of Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 7. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany a.altmann@dkfz.de.
Abstract
αvβ6 integrin is overexpressed by several carcinomas and thus considered a target for diagnostic imaging and anticancer therapies. Recently, we presented the αvβ6 integrin-binding peptide SFITGv6 as a novel potential tracer for imaging and targeted therapy of αvβ6 integrin-positive carcinomas. Here, we analyzed the affinity and specificity of 5 native αvβ6 integrin-specific binders in comparison to SFITGv6. Methods: Sunflower trypsin inhibitor 1 (SFTI1)-based peptides containing arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) motif-spanning octamers of fibronectin (SFFN1), tenascin C (SFTNC), vitronectin (SFVTN), and latency-associated peptides (LAP) 1 (SFLAP1) and 3 (SFLAP3) were synthesized, and their binding potential to αvβ6 integrin-expressing head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines was evaluated. Subsequently, stability, affinity, and specificity were assessed in vitro using radio-high-pressure liquid chromatography, surface plasmon resonance assay, and binding experiments including competition, kinetics, internalization, and efflux. αvβ6 integrin binding specificity was further evaluated by peptide histochemistry. Finally, in vivo binding properties were assessed using small-animal PET imaging and biodistribution experiments in HNSCC-bearing mice, and 68Ga-DOTA-SFLAP3 was applied for diagnostic PET/CT of an HNSCC patient. Results: When the newly designed peptides were compared, significant binding (>20%) to several HNSCC cell lines (HNO97, HNO399, and HNO223) and a fast internalization of up to 60% and 70% were observed for SFLAP3 (GRGDLGRL) and SFITGv6 (FRGDLMQL). In contrast, the other peptides displayed binding that was moderate (SFLAP1, 4.1%-12.1%) to marginal (SFFN1, SFTNC, and SFVTN, <1%) and were therefore excluded from further analysis. Notably, SFLAP3 exhibited improved affinity for αvβ6 integrin (mean half-maximal inhibitory concentration, 3.5 nM; dissociation constant, 7.4). Moreover, small-animal PET imaging and biodistribution studies of HNSCC xenograft mice revealed an increased tumor-specific accumulation 30-60 min after injection of 68Ga-labeled or 177Lu-labeled DOTA-SFLAP3. Peptide staining further demonstrated binding specificity for SFLAP3 to HNSCC tumor cells. Finally, PET/CT scanning of an HNSCC patient showed specific SFLAP3 accumulation in the primary tumor lesion (SUVmax, 5.1) and in corresponding lymph node metastases (SUVmax, 4.1). Conclusion: SFLAP3 represents a promising tracer for prognostic assessment, diagnostic imaging, and possibly targeted therapy of αvβ6 integrin-expressing tumors.
αvβ6 integrin is overexpressed by several carcinomas and thus considered a target for diagnostic imaging and anticancer therapies. Recently, we presented the αvβ6 integrin-binding peptide SFITGv6 as a novel potential tracer for imaging and targeted therapy of αvβ6 integrin-positive carcinomas. Here, we analyzed the affinity and specificity of 5 native αvβ6 integrin-specific binders in comparison to SFITGv6. Methods:Sunflower trypsin inhibitor 1 (SFTI1)-based peptides containing arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) motif-spanning octamers of fibronectin (SFFN1), tenascin C (SFTNC), vitronectin (SFVTN), and latency-associated peptides (LAP) 1 (SFLAP1) and 3 (SFLAP3) were synthesized, and their binding potential to αvβ6 integrin-expressing head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines was evaluated. Subsequently, stability, affinity, and specificity were assessed in vitro using radio-high-pressure liquid chromatography, surface plasmon resonance assay, and binding experiments including competition, kinetics, internalization, and efflux. αvβ6 integrin binding specificity was further evaluated by peptide histochemistry. Finally, in vivo binding properties were assessed using small-animal PET imaging and biodistribution experiments in HNSCC-bearing mice, and 68Ga-DOTA-SFLAP3 was applied for diagnostic PET/CT of an HNSCC patient. Results: When the newly designed peptides were compared, significant binding (>20%) to several HNSCC cell lines (HNO97, HNO399, and HNO223) and a fast internalization of up to 60% and 70% were observed for SFLAP3 (GRGDLGRL) and SFITGv6 (FRGDLMQL). In contrast, the other peptides displayed binding that was moderate (SFLAP1, 4.1%-12.1%) to marginal (SFFN1, SFTNC, and SFVTN, <1%) and were therefore excluded from further analysis. Notably, SFLAP3 exhibited improved affinity for αvβ6 integrin (mean half-maximal inhibitory concentration, 3.5 nM; dissociation constant, 7.4). Moreover, small-animal PET imaging and biodistribution studies of HNSCC xenograft mice revealed an increased tumor-specific accumulation 30-60 min after injection of 68Ga-labeled or 177Lu-labeled DOTA-SFLAP3. Peptide staining further demonstrated binding specificity for SFLAP3 to HNSCC tumor cells. Finally, PET/CT scanning of an HNSCC patient showed specific SFLAP3 accumulation in the primary tumor lesion (SUVmax, 5.1) and in corresponding lymph node metastases (SUVmax, 4.1). Conclusion: SFLAP3 represents a promising tracer for prognostic assessment, diagnostic imaging, and possibly targeted therapy of αvβ6 integrin-expressing tumors.
Authors: Sven H Hausner; Richard J Bold; Lina Y Cheuy; Helen K Chew; Megan E Daly; Ryan A Davis; Cameron C Foster; Edward J Kim; Julie L Sutcliffe Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-11-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Neil Gerard Quigley; Katja Steiger; Sebastian Hoberück; Norbert Czech; Maximilian Alexander Zierke; Susanne Kossatz; Marc Pretze; Frauke Richter; Wilko Weichert; Christian Pox; Jörg Kotzerke; Johannes Notni Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-09-24 Impact factor: 9.236