Literature DB >> 29674107

The Economics of Private Practice versus Academia in Surgery.

Maria Baimas-George1, Brian Fleischer1, James R Korndorffer1, Douglas Slakey1, Christopher DuCoin2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Residents often make career decisions regarding future practice without adequate knowledge to the realities of professional life. Currently there is a paucity of data regarding economic differences between practice models. This study seeks to illuminate the financial differences of surgical subspecialties between academic and private practice.
DESIGN: Data were collected from the Association of American Medical College (AAMC) and the Medical Group Management Association's (MGMA) 2015 reports of average annual salaries. Salaries were analyzed for general surgery and 7 subspecialties. Fixed time of practice was set at 30 years. Assumptions included 5 years as assistant professor, 10 years as associate professor, and 15 years as full professor. Formula used: (average yearly salary) × [years of practice (30 yrs - fellowship/research yrs)] + ($50,000 × yrs of fellowship/research) = total adjusted lifetime revenue.
RESULTS: As a full professor, academic surgeons in all subspecialties make significantly less than their private practice counterparts. The largest discrepancy is in vascular and cardiothoracic surgery, with full professors earning 16% and 14% less than private practitioners. Plastic surgery and general surgery are the only 2 disciplines that have similar lifetime revenues to private practitioners, earning 2% and 6% less than their counterparts' lifetime revenue.
CONCLUSIONS: Academic surgeons in all surgical subspecialties examined earn less lifetime revenue compared to those in private practice. This difference in earnings decreases but remains substantial as an academic surgeon advances. With limited exposure to the diversity of professional arenas, residents must be aware of this discrepancy.
Copyright © 2018 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; academia; economics; finance; lifetime salary income; private practice; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29674107     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  3 in total

Review 1.  Academic vs. Private Practice: An Indistinct Distinction.

Authors:  R Torrance Andrews
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  COVID-19: Current and future challenges in spine care and education - a worldwide study.

Authors:  Michael T Nolte; Garrett K Harada; Philip K Louie; Michael H McCarthy; Arash J Sayari; G Michael Mallow; Zakariah Siyaji; Niccole Germscheid; Jason Py Cheung; Marko H Neva; Mohammad El-Sharkawi; Marcelo Valacco; Daniel M Sciubba; Norman B Chutkan; Howard S An; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2020-08-28

3.  Spine Surgery and COVID-19: The Influence of Practice Type on Preparedness, Response, and Economic Impact.

Authors:  Joseph A Weiner; Peter R Swiatek; Daniel J Johnson; Philip K Louie; Garrett K Harada; Michael H McCarthy; Niccole Germscheid; Jason P Y Cheung; Marko H Neva; Mohammad El-Sharkawi; Marcelo Valacco; Daniel M Sciubba; Norman B Chutkan; Howard S An; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-08-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.