Wendelin Moser1, Somphou Sayasone2, Syda Xayavong2, Bangon Bounheuang2, Maxim Puchkov3, Jörg Huwyler3, Jan Hattendorf4, Jennifer Keiser5. 1. Department of Medical Parasitology and Infection Biology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 2. Lao Tropical and Public Health Institute, Vientiane, Laos. 3. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 5. Department of Medical Parasitology and Infection Biology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address: jennifer.keiser@swisstph.ch.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Albendazole and mebendazole are commonly used to control hookworm, but have shortcomings in their efficacy profiles. We assessed whether triple drug therapy (TDT) with albendazole, pyrantel pamoate, and oxantel pamoate was more effective than the co-administration of two drugs for the treatment of hookworm infections. METHODS: A randomised, single-blind trial was done from Sept 27 until Nov 17, 2017, in Laos. Children (6-15 years) from six schools were invited to participate. Hookworm-positive children were randomly assigned (2:2:1:1) by a computer stratified list (block sizes of six and 12) to TDT with albendazole (400 mg), pyrantel pamoate (20 mg/kg), and oxantel pamoate (20 mg/kg); albendazole plus oxantel pamoate; pyrantel pamoate plus oxantel pamoate; or mebendazole (500 mg) combined with both pyrantel pamoate and oxantel pamoate (used as proof of concept to compare the two TDTs). Two stool samples were collected at baseline and follow-up (17-30 days after treatment) and analysed with the Kato-Katz method. The primary outcome was the proportion of hookworm egg-negative children at follow-up in all Kato-Katz slides (cure rate [CR]) in the TDT with albendazole, pyrantel pamoate, and oxantel pamoate group compared with the albendazole plus oxantel pamoate and pyrantel pamoate plus oxantel pamoate groups. Secondary outcomes were tolerability 3 h and 24 h after treatment, egg reduction rates (ERRs) against hookworm, and efficacy against concomitant soil-transmitted helminth infections. Participating children and field and laboratory technicians were masked to treatment allocation. All children with follow-up data were included in the primary analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03278431. FINDINGS:1529 children were assessed for eligibility, of whom 533 provided complete baseline data and 414 provided complete outcome data. The CR was higher for the TDT albendazole, pyrantel pamoate, and oxantel pamoate (116 [84%] of 138) than with albendazole plus oxantel pamoate (73 [53%] of 138; odds ratio 4·7, 95% CI 2·7-8·3; p<0·0001) and pyrantel pamoate plus oxantel pamoate (36 [52%] of 69; 4·8, 2·5-9·3; p<0·0001). The geometric ERR of the TDT albendazole, pyrantel pamoate, and oxantel pamoate (99·9%) was higher than that for albendazole plus oxantel pamoate (99·0%; difference in ERR 0·9 percentage points, 95% CI 0·5-1·4), and pyrantel pamoate plus oxantel pamoate (99·2%; 0·7 percentage points, 0·3-1·3). Adverse events were reported by six (1%) children 3 h and none 24 h after treatment, without any difference across treatment groups. INTERPRETATION: TDT with albendazole, pyrantel pamoate, and oxantel pamoate could make a difference, in particular in the context of soil-transmitted helminth elimination. Pyrantel pamoate might be a useful alternative to prevent benzimidazole resistance; however, larger trials are needed to confirm this finding. FUNDING: Swiss National Science Foundation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Albendazole and mebendazole are commonly used to control hookworm, but have shortcomings in their efficacy profiles. We assessed whether triple drug therapy (TDT) with albendazole, pyrantel pamoate, and oxantel pamoate was more effective than the co-administration of two drugs for the treatment of hookworm infections. METHODS: A randomised, single-blind trial was done from Sept 27 until Nov 17, 2017, in Laos. Children (6-15 years) from six schools were invited to participate. Hookworm-positive children were randomly assigned (2:2:1:1) by a computer stratified list (block sizes of six and 12) to TDT with albendazole (400 mg), pyrantel pamoate (20 mg/kg), and oxantel pamoate (20 mg/kg); albendazole plus oxantel pamoate; pyrantel pamoate plus oxantel pamoate; or mebendazole (500 mg) combined with both pyrantel pamoate and oxantel pamoate (used as proof of concept to compare the two TDTs). Two stool samples were collected at baseline and follow-up (17-30 days after treatment) and analysed with the Kato-Katz method. The primary outcome was the proportion of hookworm egg-negative children at follow-up in all Kato-Katz slides (cure rate [CR]) in the TDT with albendazole, pyrantel pamoate, and oxantel pamoate group compared with the albendazole plus oxantel pamoate and pyrantel pamoate plus oxantel pamoate groups. Secondary outcomes were tolerability 3 h and 24 h after treatment, egg reduction rates (ERRs) against hookworm, and efficacy against concomitant soil-transmitted helminth infections. Participating children and field and laboratory technicians were masked to treatment allocation. All children with follow-up data were included in the primary analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03278431. FINDINGS: 1529 children were assessed for eligibility, of whom 533 provided complete baseline data and 414 provided complete outcome data. The CR was higher for the TDT albendazole, pyrantel pamoate, and oxantel pamoate (116 [84%] of 138) than with albendazole plus oxantel pamoate (73 [53%] of 138; odds ratio 4·7, 95% CI 2·7-8·3; p<0·0001) and pyrantel pamoate plus oxantel pamoate (36 [52%] of 69; 4·8, 2·5-9·3; p<0·0001). The geometric ERR of the TDT albendazole, pyrantel pamoate, and oxantel pamoate (99·9%) was higher than that for albendazole plus oxantel pamoate (99·0%; difference in ERR 0·9 percentage points, 95% CI 0·5-1·4), and pyrantel pamoate plus oxantel pamoate (99·2%; 0·7 percentage points, 0·3-1·3). Adverse events were reported by six (1%) children 3 h and none 24 h after treatment, without any difference across treatment groups. INTERPRETATION: TDT with albendazole, pyrantel pamoate, and oxantel pamoate could make a difference, in particular in the context of soil-transmitted helminth elimination. Pyrantel pamoate might be a useful alternative to prevent benzimidazole resistance; however, larger trials are needed to confirm this finding. FUNDING: Swiss National Science Foundation.
Authors: Kathryn J Else; Jennifer Keiser; Celia V Holland; Richard K Grencis; David B Sattelle; Ricardo T Fujiwara; Lilian L Bueno; Samuel O Asaolu; Oluyomi A Sowemimo; Philip J Cooper Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Tina V A Hansen; Susanna Cirera; Cédric Neveu; Elise Courtot; Claude L Charvet; Kirstine Calloe; Dan A Klaerke; Richard J Martin Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Marta S Palmeirim; Sabine Specht; Ivan Scandale; Irene Gander-Meisterernst; Monika Chabicovsky; Jennifer Keiser Journal: Drugs Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Daniel Dana; Sara Roose; Johnny Vlaminck; Mio Ayana; Zeleke Mekonnen; Peter Geldhof; Bruno Levecke Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2022-01-18