| Literature DB >> 29673221 |
Zhibo Ma1,2, Yinan Wang3,4, Qiang Shen5,6, Han Zhang7,8, Xuetao Guo9,10.
Abstract
MEMS fabrication that is based on the silicon-on-glass (SOG) process requires many steps, including patterning, anodic bonding, deep reactive ion etching (DRIE), and chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). The effects of the process parameters of CMP and DRIE are investigated in this study. The process parameters of CMP, such as abrasive size, load pressure, and pH value of SF1 solution are examined to optimize the total thickness variation in the structure and the surface quality. The ratio of etching and passivation cycle time and the process pressure are also adjusted to achieve satisfactory performance during DRIE. The process is optimized to avoid neither the notching nor lag effects on the fabricated silicon structures. For demonstrating the capability of the modified CMP and DRIE processes, a z-axis micro gyroscope is fabricated that is based on the SOG process. Initial test results show that the average surface roughness of silicon is below 1.13 nm and the thickness of the silicon is measured to be 50 μm. All of the structures are well defined without the footing effect by the use of the modified DRIE process. The initial performance test results of the resonant frequency for the drive and sense modes are 4.048 and 4.076 kHz, respectively. The demands for this kind of SOG MEMS device can be fulfilled using the optimized process.Entities:
Keywords: CMP; MEMS; SOG; SOI; fabrication; gyroscope
Year: 2018 PMID: 29673221 PMCID: PMC5948758 DOI: 10.3390/s18041240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Process parameters for chemical mechanical polishing (CMP).
| Process | Powder | Thickness of the Silicon [μm] | Ra [nm] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Center | Primary | Secondary | Left | Right | Average | ||
| Lapping | 20 μm Al2O3 | 256 | 254 | 251 | 253 | 254 | 85.04 |
| 9 μm Al2O3 | 204 | 204 | 204 | 204 | 203 | 79.29 | |
| Polishing | 3 μm cerium oxide | 202 | 203 | 203 | 202 | 203 | 8.19 |
| SF1 | 201 | 200 | 201 | 201 | 201 | 1.13 | |
Figure 1Photograph of the silicon surface and surface quality before CMP. (a) Silicon surface before CMP; (b) Measurement of the surface roughness.
Figure 2Photograph of the breakthrough on silicon surface.
Figure 3Photograph of the underlying structures that appeared during CMP.
Figure 4Top view of the final surface quality. (a) Final wafers with several test points; (b) Measurement of final surface quality
Figure 5Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of lag effect for unexpected Deep reactive-ion etching (DRIE) process results.
Figure 6SEM images of footing effect for unexpected DRIE process results.
Process Parameters of DRIE.
| Recipe | Etching/Passivation (s) | Pressure (mTorr) | Average Etching Rate (μm/min) |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | 6/5 | 43 | 4.67 |
| b | 8/10 | 35 | 3.23 |
| c | 8/10 | 30 | 2.56 |
Figure 7Cross-section views of DRIE results. All of the geometric parameters of the test structure are identical. (a) Lag effect; (b) Anti-lag effect.
Optimal Parameters of DRIE.
| Etch | Passivate | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| SF6 flow rate (sccm) | 180 | C4F8 flow rate (sccm) | 120 |
| O2 flow rate (sccm) | 20 | ||
| Coil power (w) | 800 | Coil power (w) | 800 |
| Platen power (w) | 20 | Platen power (w) | 0 |
| Cycle time (s) | 8 | Cycle time (s) | 10 |
| Pressure (mTorr) | 30 | ||
Figure 8SEM image of the DRIE result after adjusting the process parameters.
Figure 9Silicon-on-glass (SOG) fabrication process used to implement the proposed gyroscope. (a) Formed anchors on silicon substrate; (b) Pattern of Cr/Au at the glass substrate; (c) Anodic bonding of silicon and glass substrates; (d) CMP of the silicon; (e) Pattern of the photoresist etch mask for DRIE and thoroughly etched silicon substrate; and, (f) Remove photoresist etch mask.
Figure 10SEM of micro gyroscope fabricated by the SOG process. (a) Top view of the gyroscope; (b) Side view of the gyroscope.
Figure 11Test system of the gyroscope.
Figure 12Resonant frequency and quality factor measurement. (a) Drive mode; (b) Sense mode.
Figure 13Scale factor curve.
Figure 14Equivalent angular rate.