| Literature DB >> 29673175 |
Chengyang Deng1, Jinwu Kang2, Tao Feng3, Yunlong Feng4, Xiang Wang5, Pengyue Wu6.
Abstract
The selective laser melting of tin bronze (CuSn10) powder was performed with a laser energy density intensity level at 210, 220, and 230 J/mm². The composition was homogeneous with almost all tin dissolved into the matrix. The grain size of the obtained alpha copper phase was around 5 μm. The best properties were achieved at 220 J/mm² laser energy density with a density of 8.82 g/cm³, hardness of 78.2 HRB (Rockwell Hardness measured on the B scale), yield strength of 399 MPa, tensile strength of 490 MPa, and an elongation that reached 19%. “Balling effect” appeared and resulted into a decrease of properties when the laser energy density increased to 230 J/mm².Entities:
Keywords: CuSn10 powder; laser energy density; mechanical properties; microstructure; selective laser melting
Year: 2018 PMID: 29673175 PMCID: PMC5951498 DOI: 10.3390/ma11040614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Three-dimensional (3D)-printed samples and room temperature tensile tests. (a) The fabrication process; (b) The width of three-dimensional (3D)-printed sample; (c) The length of three-dimensional (3D)-printed sample; (d) Tensile specimen machine; (e) The sample used for tensile test.
Experimental parameters.
| Mark | Laser Energy Density/J/mm2 |
|---|---|
| A1 | 190 |
| A2 | 200 |
| A3 | 210 |
| A4 | 220 |
| A5 | 230 |
Figure 2Mechanical properties at different laser energy densities. (a) The hardness and density of the samples; (b) The yield strength of the samples; (c) The tensile strength of the samples; (d) The elongation of the samples.
Mechanical properties at different laser energy densities.
| The Standard | Density/g/cm3 | Hardness/HRB | Yield Strength/MPa | Tensile Strength/Mpa | Elongation % | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YS/T 545-2006 | 8.6 | 55 | 360 | 170 | 6 | ||||
| Laser Energy Density | Measured Value | Measured Value | Increased by | Measured Value | Increased by | Measured Value | Increased by | Measured Value | Increased by |
| E = 210 J/mm2 | 8.8 ± 0.2 | 75.5 ± 0.3 | 37% | 369 ± 3 | 3% | 433 ± 3 | 155% | 14 ± 0.6 | 133% |
| E = 220 J/mm2 | 8.9 ± 0.1 | 76.6 ± 0.2 | 39% | 399 ± 2 | 11% | 490 ± 4 | 188% | 19 ± 0.8 | 217% |
| E = 230 J/mm2 | 8.7 ± 0.2 | 74.9 ± 0.2 | 36% | 390 ± 2 | 8% | 486 ± 3 | 185% | 15 ± 0.7 | 150% |
Figure 3Tensile stress-strain cures of samples in different laser energy densities.
Figure 4Metallographic morphology at different laser energy densities. (a) Metallographic morphology at 210 J/mm2 laser energy density; (b) Metallographic morphology at 220 J/mm2 laser energy density; (c) Metallographic morphology at 230 J/mm2 laser energy density.
Figure 5Component analysis at a laser energy density of 220 J/mm2.