| Literature DB >> 29673152 |
Himanshu Meghwani1, Pankaj Prabhakar2, Soheb A Mohammed3, Pamila Dua4, Sandeep Seth5, Milind P Hote6, Sanjay K Banerjee7, Sudheer Arava8, Ruma Ray9, Subir Kumar Maulik10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study was designed to explore any beneficial effect of Ocimum sanctum (Linn) (OS) in experimental pulmonary hypertension (PH) in rats. OS is commonly known as “holy basil” and “Tulsi” and is used in the Indian System of Medicine as antidiabetic, antioxidant, hepatoprotective, adaptogenic, and cardioprotective.Entities:
Keywords: Nox; Ocimum sanctum; echocardiography; percentage medial wall thickness; pulmonary hypertension
Year: 2018 PMID: 29673152 PMCID: PMC6023537 DOI: 10.3390/medicines5020034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicines (Basel) ISSN: 2305-6320
Primers used for gene expression analysis.
| Name | Direction | Sequences | Product Size | Temperature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCL-2 | Forward | CCATGACTGAGGGACCAACT | 150 bp | 56 °C |
| Reverse | CTCTTCTTCCTGCCCTTCCT | |||
| BAX | Forward | TGCAGAGGATGATTGCGACT | 200 bp | 60 °C |
| Reverse | GATCAGCTCGGGCACTTTAG | |||
| RPL32 | Forward | AGATTCAAGGGCCAGATCCT | 175 bp | 57 °C |
| Reverse | CGATGGCTTTTCGGTTCTTA |
Figure 1Effect of O. sanctum (OS) on (A) LW/HW; (B) RV/HW; (C) Fulton’s index [RV/(LV + IVS)] in MCT-induced PH. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; a—as compared to control, b—as compared to MCT where; HW: Heart weight, LW: Lung weight, RV: Right ventricular weight, LV: Left ventricular weight, IVS: Interventricular septum weight.
Figure 2Effect of OS on (A) right ventricular systolic pressure; (B) right ventricular end diastolic pressure, and (C) heart rate in MCT-induced PH. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; a—as compared to control, b—as compared to MCT.
Figure 3Effect of OS on (A) RVoTD/AoD; and (B) PAAT/ET ratio in MCT-induced PH. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; a—as compared to control, b—as compared to MCT.
Figure 4Effect of OS on percentage medial wall thickness of pulmonary artery. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; a—as compared to control, b—as compared to MCT.
Effect of OS on lung thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) levels, lung reduced GSH, lung catalase, and lung superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels in MCT-induced PH. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; a—as compared to control, b—as compared to MCT.
| Groups | TBARS | GSH | Catalase | SOD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 19.60 ± 2.5 | 27.36 ± 3.0 | 0.85 ± 0.04 | 110.51 ± 10.8 |
| MCT | 155.46 ± 13.4 ***,a | 13.98 ± 2.0 ***,a | 0.21 ± 0.01 ***,a | 35.4 ± 5.7 ***,a |
| MCT + SIL | 72.36 ± 12.7 **,b | 17.22 ± 3.1 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 51.98 ± 3.5 |
| MCT + OS | 99.05 ± 20.5 *,b | 12.99 ± 1.9 | 0.51 ± 0.04 ***,b | 41.49 ± 6.4 |
Figure 5Effect of OS on (A) lung Nox-1 protein expression in MCT-induced PH; (B) heart mRNA expression of Bcl2/Bax ratio. *** p < 0.001; a—as compared to control, b—as compared to MCT. *** p < 0.001; a—as compared to control, b—as compared to MCT.