| Literature DB >> 29673096 |
Toshihiro Kitajima1,2, Seisuke Sakamoto1, Kengo Sasaki1, Soichi Narumoto1, Kourosh Kazemi1,3, Yoshihiro Hirata1, Akinari Fukuda1, Rumi Imai4, Osamu Miyazaki4, Rie Irie5, Satoshi Teramukai6, Shinji Uemoto2, Mureo Kasahara1.
Abstract
Reducing graft thickness is essential to prevent large-for-size graft problems in pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, long-term outcomes of LDLT using reduced-thickness left lateral segment (LLS) grafts are unclear. In 89 patients who underwent LDLT using reduced LLS grafts between 2005 and 2017, short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between a nonanatomically reduced LLS (NAR-LLS) graft group and a reduced-thickness LLS graft group. Estimated blood loss was lower and abdominal skin closure was less needed in the recipient operation in the reduced-thickness LLS graft group. Postoperatively, portal vein (PV) flow was significantly decreased in the NAR-LLS graft group, and there was shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stay and fewer postoperative complications, especially bacteremia, in the reduced-thickness LLS graft group. Graft survival at 1 and 3 years after LDLT using reduced-thickness LLS grafts was 95.2% and 92.4%, respectively, which was significantly better than for NAR-LLS grafts. Multivariate analysis revealed that fulminant liver failure, hepatofugal PV flow before LDLT, and NAR-LLS graft were associated with poor graft survival. In conclusion, LDLT using reduced-thickness LLS grafts is a safe and feasible option with better short- and long-term outcomes in comparison with NAR-LLS grafts.Entities:
Keywords: clinical research/practice; graft survival; liver transplantation/hepatology; liver transplantation: living donor; patient survival
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29673096 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14875
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Transplant ISSN: 1600-6135 Impact factor: 8.086