Literature DB >> 29672340

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Nonsurgical Treatment in Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Meta-Analysis.

Abdulaziz F Ahmed1, Motasem Salameh, Nedal AlKhatib, Aissam Elmhiregh, Ghalib O Ahmed.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and nonsurgical treatment outcomes in displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched in September 2017. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials reporting nonunion, shoulder functional outcomes, and subsequent surgery rates or pain scores. We excluded studies with patients younger than 16 years, maximum follow-up less than 9 months, and inaccessible full text. DATA EXTRACTION: Extracted data included the first author, publication year, number of patients, number of nonunions, Constant scores, disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores, number of subsequent surgeries, and pain measured using the visual analog scale. DATA SYNTHESIS: The risk ratio of nonunion was 0.15 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.08-0.31] in ORIF compared with that of nonsurgical treatment. Constant and DASH scores were significantly better in ORIF up to 6 months. The mean difference (MD) in DASH scores at 12 months was statistically insignificant in both treatments (MD, -4.19; 95% CI, -9.34 to 0.96). Constant scores remained significant in ORIF (MD, 4.39; 95% CI, 1.03-7.75). Subsequent surgeries and pain scores were similar in both treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant reduction in nonunions and favorable early functional outcomes are associated with ORIF. Nevertheless, late functional outcomes, subsequent surgeries, and pain scores are similar to those of nonsurgical treatment. Although patients treated with ORIF mainly had subsequent elective plate removals, nonsurgically treated patients had more surgical fixations for nonunions. As a result, there remains inconsistent evidence regarding the best treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29672340     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  5 in total

1.  Bilateral Clavicle Fractures - A Rare Injury.

Authors:  Kishore Vellingiri; Hariprasad Seenappa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-11-11

2.  Management of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures with Figure-of-Eight Bandage: The Impact of Residual Shortening on Shoulder Function.

Authors:  Carlo Biz; Davide Scucchiari; Assunta Pozzuoli; Elisa Belluzzi; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Antonio Berizzi; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-07

3.  Identification of risk factors for surgical site infection after type II and type III tibial pilon fracture surgery.

Authors:  Hao Hu; Jian Zhang; Xue-Guan Xie; Yan-Kun Dai; Xu Huang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 1.534

4.  Patient-reported outcomes after initial conservative fracture treatment in primary healthcare - a survey study.

Authors:  Stein Vabo; Knut Steen; Christina Brudvik; Steinar Hunskaar; Tone Morken
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-07-30

5.  Clavicle hook plate versus distal clavicle locking plate for Neer type II distal clavicle fractures.

Authors:  Liang Li; Tian-Yan Li; Peichao Jiang; Guizhen Lin; Hongxiao Wu; Xiaochuan Han; Xuezhong Yu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.