Literature DB >> 29672151

Adjusting Suicide Rates in a Military Population: Methods to Determine the Appropriate Standard Population.

Eren Youmans Watkins1, Anita Spiess1, Ihsan Abdul-Rahman1, Christopher Hill1, Nkechinyere Gibson1, Jerrica Nichols1, Vanessa McLeod1, Latoya Johnson1, Trevor Mitchell1, Joseph Anton Pecko1, Kenneth Cox1.   

Abstract

The choice of the standard population is important when calculating adjusted rates for a military population: results can influence policies and funding allocations for programs and initiatives for suicide prevention. We describe the methodological considerations and decision-making process used in choosing a standard population for adjusting rates to compare suicide among US Army soldiers and the general US population. We examined 5 different standard populations, using the direct method to adjust annual suicide rates for the Army and the US population, 2004 to 2015, for age and for age and sex. The pattern of the Army and US population age- and sex-adjusted rates remained consistent with crude rates when adjusted to any of the Army standard population distributions. Using an Army distribution as the standard population produces suicide rates consistent with routine messaging about suicide trends among Army soldiers.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29672151      PMCID: PMC5944885          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  8 in total

1.  Age adjustment using the 2000 projected U.S. population.

Authors:  R J Klein; C A Schoenborn
Journal:  Healthy People 2010 Stat Notes       Date:  2001-01

2.  Direct standardization (age-adjusted death rates).

Authors:  L R Curtin; R J Klein
Journal:  Healthy People 2000 Stat Notes       Date:  1995-03

3.  Mental health risk factors for suicides in the US Army, 2007--8.

Authors:  Kathleen E Bachynski; Michelle Canham-Chervak; Sandra A Black; Esther O Dada; Amy M Millikan; Bruce H Jones
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 2.399

4.  Strengthening the validity of population-based suicide rate comparisons: an illustration using U.S. military and civilian data.

Authors:  Karen M Eaton; Stephen C Messer; Abigail L Garvey Wilson; Charles W Hoge
Journal:  Suicide Life Threat Behav       Date:  2006-04

Review 5.  Age standardization of death rates: implementation of the year 2000 standard.

Authors:  R N Anderson; H M Rosenberg
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  1998-10-07

6.  Suicide in the US Army.

Authors:  Timothy W Lineberry; Stephen S O'Connor
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Increase in Suicide in the United States, 1999-2014.

Authors:  Sally C Curtin; Margaret Warner; Holly Hedegaard
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2016-04

Review 8.  Suicide among soldiers: a review of psychosocial risk and protective factors.

Authors:  Matthew K Nock; Charlene A Deming; Carol S Fullerton; Stephen E Gilman; Matthew Goldenberg; Ronald C Kessler; James E McCarroll; Katie A McLaughlin; Christopher Peterson; Michael Schoenbaum; Barbara Stanley; Robert J Ursano
Journal:  Psychiatry       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.458

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Identifying suicidal subtypes and dynamic indicators of increasing and decreasing suicide risk in active duty military personnel: Study protocol.

Authors:  Lily A Brown; Craig J Bryan; Jonathan E Butner; Jeffrey V Tabares; Stacey Young-McCaughan; Willie J Hale; Brooke A Fina; Edna B Foa; Patricia A Resick; Daniel J Taylor; Hillary Coon; Douglas E Williamson; Katherine A Dondanville; Elisa V Borah; Carmen P McLean; Jennifer Schuster Wachen; Kristi E Pruiksma; Ann Marie Hernandez; Brett T Litz; Jim Mintz; Jeffrey S Yarvis; Adam M Borah; Karin L Nicholson; Douglas M Maurer; Kevin M Kelly; Alan L Peterson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2021-02-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.