| Literature DB >> 29671186 |
Jessica Spence1, Emilie Belley-Côté2, Shun Fu Lee3, Shrikant Bangdiwala3, Richard Whitlock4, Yannick LeManach5, Summer Syed6, Andre Lamy4, Eric Jacobsohn7, Sarah MacIsaac3, P J Devereaux8, Stuart Connolly9.
Abstract
Increasingly, clinicians and researchers recognize that studies of interventions need to evaluate not only their therapeutic efficacy (i.e., the effect on an outcome in ideal, controlled settings) but also their real-world effectiveness in broad, unselected patient groups. Effectiveness trials inform clinical practice by comparing variations in therapeutic approaches that fall within the standard of care. In this article, we discuss the need for studies of comparative effectiveness in anesthesia and the limitations of individual patient randomized-controlled trials in determining comparative effectiveness. We introduce the concept of randomized cluster crossover trials as a means of answering questions of comparative effectiveness in anesthesia, using the design of the Benzodiazepine-Free Cardiac Anesthesia for Reduction in Postoperative Delirium (B-Free) trial (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03053869).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29671186 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-018-1130-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can J Anaesth ISSN: 0832-610X Impact factor: 5.063