Literature DB >> 29671118

Application of Computer-Aided Tongue Inspection for Preliminary Screening of Esophageal Cancer.

Jin-Long Duan1, Bo Deng2, Guo-Hui Song3, Zhi-Feng Chen4, Yan-Wei Gong3, Yu-Hua He3, Li-Qun Jia5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To differentiate patients with esophageal cancer or premalignant lesions from the high-risk population for preliminary screening of esophageal cancer using a feature index determined by a computer-aided tongue information acquisition and processing system (DS01-B).
METHODS: Totally, 213 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer or premalignant lesions and 2,840 normal subjects were collected including primarily screened and reexamined, all of them were confirmed with histological examinations. Their tongue color space values and manifestation features were extracted by DS01-B and analyzed. Firstly, the analysis of variance was performed to differentiate normal subjects from patients with esophageal cancer and premalignant lesions. Secondly, the logistic regression was conducted using 10 features and gender, age to get a predictive equation of the possibility of esophageal cancer or premalignant lesions. Lastly, the equation was tested by subjects undergoing primary screening.
RESULTS: Saturation (S) values in the HSV color space showed significant differences between patients with esophageal cancer and normal subjects or those with mild atypical hyperplasia (P<0.05); blue-to-yellow (b) values in the Lab color space showed significant differences between patients with esophageal cancer or premalignant lesions and normal subjects (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the computer-aided tongue inspection approach had an accuracy of 72.3% (2008/2776) in identifying patients with esophageal cancer or premalignant lesions for preliminary screening in high-risk population.
CONCLUSION: Computer-aided tongue inspection, with descriptive and quantitative profile as described in this study, could be applied as a cost- and timeefficient, non-invasive approach for preliminary screening of esophageal cancer in high-risk population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer-aided tongue inspection; esophageal cancer; logistic regression; preliminary differential diagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29671118     DOI: 10.1007/s11655-018-2840-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin J Integr Med        ISSN: 1672-0415            Impact factor:   1.978


  10 in total

Review 1.  Esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Enzinger; Robert J Mayer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Automatic T1 bladder tumor detection by using wavelet analysis in cystoscopy images.

Authors:  Nuno R Freitas; Pedro M Vieira; Estevão Lima; Carlos S Lima
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  The advantages of using traditional Chinese medicine as an adjunctive therapy in the whole course of cancer treatment instead of only terminal stage of cancer.

Authors:  Fanghua Qi; Lin Zhao; Aiyan Zhou; Bo Zhang; Anyuan Li; Zhixue Wang; Junqing Han
Journal:  Biosci Trends       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.400

4.  Diagnosis of early-stage esophageal cancer by Raman spectroscopy and chemometric techniques.

Authors:  Mika Ishigaki; Yasuhiro Maeda; Akinori Taketani; Bibin B Andriana; Ryu Ishihara; Kanet Wongravee; Yukihiro Ozaki; Hidetoshi Sato
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.616

5.  Global trends in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Gautam K Malhotra; Ujwal Yanala; Advaitaa Ravipati; Matthew Follet; M Vijayakumar; Chandrakanth Are
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 1.2015.

Authors:  Jaffer A Ajani; Thomas A D'Amico; Khaldoun Almhanna; David J Bentrem; Stephen Besh; Joseph Chao; Prajnan Das; Crystal Denlinger; Paul Fanta; Charles S Fuchs; Hans Gerdes; Robert E Glasgow; James A Hayman; Steven Hochwald; Wayne L Hofstetter; David H Ilson; Dawn Jaroszewski; Kory Jasperson; Rajesh N Keswani; Lawrence R Kleinberg; W Michael Korn; Stephen Leong; A Craig Lockhart; Mary F Mulcahy; Mark B Orringer; James A Posey; George A Poultsides; Aaron R Sasson; Walter J Scott; Vivian E Strong; Thomas K Varghese; Mary Kay Washington; Christopher G Willett; Cameron D Wright; Debra Zelman; Nicole McMillian; Hema Sundar
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 11.908

7.  The variability of TCM pattern diagnosis and herbal prescription on rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Grant G Zhang; Wen-Lin Lee; Lixing Lao; Barker Bausell; Brian Berman; Barry Handwerger
Journal:  Altern Ther Health Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.305

8.  Effects of questionnaire-based diagnosis and training on inter-rater reliability among practitioners of traditional Chinese medicine.

Authors:  Scott Mist; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Mikel Aickin
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.579

9.  Adjunctive traditional Chinese medicine therapy improves survival in patients with advanced breast cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Yuan-Wen Lee; Ta-Liang Chen; Yu-Ru Vernon Shih; Chu-Lin Tsai; Chuen-Chau Chang; Hung-Hua Liang; Sung-Hui Tseng; Shu-Chen Chien; Ching-Chiung Wang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  The Study on the Agreement between Automatic Tongue Diagnosis System and Traditional Chinese Medicine Practitioners.

Authors:  Lun-Chien Lo; Yung-Fu Chen; Wen-Jiuan Chen; Tsung-Lin Cheng; John Y Chiang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.629

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.