| Literature DB >> 29671101 |
Xiaolin Zhu1, Shaomin Zhou1, Jing Guo1, Xiyue Zhao1, Guanghua Yang2, Zhiqiang Cai3.
Abstract
Paichongding (IPP) is a neonicotinoid chiral insecticide with independent intellectual property in China. IPP application can increase crop yield, and also lead to insecticide residue and pollution in soils, which will affect microbial population and community composition in soils. In this study, four different types of soils were employed to inquire into the impact of IPP on eukaryal community and species-group through pyrosequencing of 18S rRNA gene amplicons. Fungal population differed in different soils at different days after IPP treatment (DAT). Eukaryal community species in CK (control check) groups were more rich than that with Paichongding sprayed at 5 DAT, while eukaryal species in CK soils at 60 DAT was relatively slight. Shannon's H' analysis indicated fungal species in CK soils were also higher at 5 DAT and relative lower at 60 DAT, except in soil C. There are also differences in the phyla and genus levels of the eukaryotic communities in the soil. After IPP application, the relative abundance of Nectriaceae increased 3-4 times in soil C. In soil F, Phaeosphaeriaceae increased to 57.3% at 5 DAT. The genus of Guehomyces, Aspergillus and Alternaria increased from 3.1 to 9.7, 1.1 to 4.6, 1.5 to 6.7% in soil H, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Anaerobic soils; Eukaryal community; Paichongding; Pyrosequencing; Soil eukaryal population
Year: 2018 PMID: 29671101 PMCID: PMC5906409 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-018-0590-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Physico-chemical characteristics of the experimental soils
| Characteristics | Yellow loam soil (F) | Huangshi soil (J) | Paddy field on desalting muddy polder (C) | Yellow paddy soil (H) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | Longquan, Fujian Province | Changzhou, Jiangsu Province | Cixi, Zhejiang Province | Jingzhou, Hubei Province |
| pH (H2O) | 6.63 | 5.95 | 8.25 | 6.70 |
| OM, % | 2.67 | 1.52 | 2.48 | 1.98 |
| CEC, cmol kg−1 | 14.09 | 7.11 | 16.1 | 13.9 |
| Clay, % | 38.7 | 33.5 | 24.3 | 33.0 |
| Silt, % | 50.4 | 49.8 | 71.1 | 51.2 |
| Sand, % | 10.9 | 16.7 | 4.6 | 15.8 |
| Texture, % (mm) | ||||
| < 0.01 | 67.4 | 60.7 | 64.7 | 67.4 |
| 0.01–0.09 | 28.3 | 32.6 | 34.5 | 28.3 |
| > 0.09 | 4.3 | 6.7 | 0.8 | 4.3 |
| Total N, % | 0.24 | 0.08 | 1.03 | 0.12 |
| P, mg kg−1 | 21.25 | 7.65 | 15.37 | 10.25 |
| K, g kg−1 | 13.47 | 10.7 | 22.9 | 5.22 |
OM organic matter, CEC cation exchange capacity
Fig. 1Effect of IPP on soil fungal population for different incubation periods in soils
Fig. 2Rarefaction curves (a) and Shannon–Wiener curves (b) (CYCK: CK of soil C; CY: soil C; FY: soil F; FYCK: CK of soil F; HY: soil H; HYCK: CK of soil H; JY: soil J; JYCK: CK of soil J)
Fig. 3Eukaryal composition of the different communities (a Percentage of relative read abundance of eukaryal phyla within each community; b Percentage of relative read abundance of eukaryal genus within each community)
Fig. 5Fungal PCoA analysis results in soils
Fig. 4Fungal Venn analysis in soils
Fig. 6Distribution heatmap of eukaryal genus arranged by hierarchical clustering in soils with different treatment