| Literature DB >> 29670660 |
Kai Sun1, Xu Song1, RenYong Jia2, Zhongqiong Yin1, Yuanfeng Zou1, Lixia Li1, Lizi Yin1, Changliang He1, Xiaoxia Liang1, Guizhou Yue3, Qiankun Cui1, Yi Yang1.
Abstract
AIM: Pain and inflammation are associated with many diseases in humans and animals. Galla Chinensis, a traditional Chinese medicine, has a variety of pharmacological properties. The purpose of this study was to evaluate analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities of Galla Chinensis through different animal models.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29670660 PMCID: PMC5835261 DOI: 10.1155/2018/6784032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1The electrical hot-plate study in mice. The values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 10). The asterisk denotes the significance levels in comparison with the negative control: P < 0.05; P < 0.01.
Effects of Galla Chinensis on the acetic acid-induced writhing in mice.
| Group | Dose | Writhing times | Inhibition (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | — | 35.50 ± 1.91 | — |
| Indomethacin | 2 mg/kg | 17.00 ± 3.83 | 52.11 |
|
| 1 g/kg | 13.00 ± 3.37 | 63.38 |
|
| 0.5 g/kg | 21.00 ± 2.94 | 40.85 |
|
| 0.25 g/kg | 22.00 ± 4.97 | 38.03 |
The values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 10). The asterisk denotes the significance levels in comparison with the negative control: P < 0.01.
Effects of Galla Chinensis on xylene-induced ear edema test.
| Group | Dose | Edema degree (mg) | Inhibition/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | — | 13.37 ± 3.37 | — |
| Indomethacin | 2 mg/kg | 6.67 ± 2.50 | 50.12% |
| Galla Chinensis | 1 g/kg | 7.03 ± 1.23 | 47.45% |
| Galla Chinensis | 0.5 g/kg | 8.43 ± 2.72 | 36.91% |
| Galla Chinensis | 0.25 g/kg | 10.93 ± 2.29 | 18.21% |
The values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 10). The asterisk denotes the significance levels in comparison with the negative control: P < 0.05; P < 0.01.
Figure 2Effect of varying doses of Galla Chinensis on acetic acid-indeed capillary permeability. The values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 10). The asterisk denotes the significance levels in comparison with the negative control: P < 0.05; P < 0.01.
Effects of Galla Chinensis on carrageenan-induced rat paw edema.
| Groups | Dose | Carrageenan-induced rat paw edema M ± SD (% inhibition of paw volume) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | 4 h | 5 h | 6 h | ||
| Control | — | 35.83 ± 13.41 | 48.61 ± 10.29 | 46.39 ± 13.34 | 39.59 ± 7.45 | 39.56 ± 1078 | 35.82 ± 7.26 |
| Indomethacin | 2 mg/kg | 22.88 ± 1.88 | 22.55 ± 7.55 | 24.45 ± 11.08 | 26.76 ± 10.37 | 22.88 ± 1.88 | 21.17 ± 10.45 |
|
| 1 g/kg | 20.17 ± 9.48 | 27.19 ± 5.69 | 29.41 ± 3.99 | 31.25 ± 8.20 | 30.19 ± 8.04 | 29.04 ± 6.48 |
|
| 0.5 g/kg | 25.96 ± 13.12 | 29.04 ± 6.48 | 30.13 ± 2.23 | 30.63 ± 7.14 | 31.17 ± 11.72 | 29.94 ± 10.32 |
|
| 0.25 g/kg | 33.38 ± 1.74 | 42.90 ± 13.49 | 39.88 ± 14.66 | 34.61 ± 8.24 | 34.51 ± 5.34 | 35.64 ± 7.61 |
The values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 8). The asterisk denotes the significance levels in comparison with the negative control: P < 0.05.
Figure 3The changes of inflammatory cytokines in each group. The values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 10). The asterisk denotes the significance levels in comparison with the control: P < 0.05; P < 0.01.