| Literature DB >> 29670318 |
Miriam Schaider1, Tone Novak2, Christian Komposch3, Hans-Jörg Leis4, Günther Raspotnig1,4.
Abstract
The homologous and phylogenetically old scent glands of harvestmen-also called defensive or repugnatorial glands-represent an ideal system for a model reconstruction of the evolutionary history of exocrine secretion chemistry ("phylogenetic chemosystematics"). While the secretions of Laniatores (mainly phenols, benzoquinones), Cyphophthalmi (naphthoquinones, chloro-naphthoquinones, methyl-ketones) and some Eupnoi (naphthoquinones, ethyl-ketones) are fairly well studied, one open question refers to the still largely enigmatic scent gland chemistry of representatives of the suborder Dyspnoi and the relation of dyspnoan chemistry to the remaining suborders. We here report on the secretion of a nemastomatid Dyspnoi, Nemastoma triste, which is composed of straight-chain methyl-ketones (heptan-2-one, nonan-2-one, 6-tridecen-2-one, 8-tridecen-2-one), methyl-branched methyl-ketones (5-methyl-heptan-2-one, 6-methyl-nonan-2-one), naphthoquinones (1,4-naphthoquinone, 6-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone) and chloro-naphthoquinones (4-chloro-1,2-naphthoquinone, 4-chloro-6-methyl-1,2-naphthoquinone). Chemically, the secretions of N. triste are remarkably reminiscent of those found in Cyphophthalmi. While naphthoquinones are widely distributed across the scent gland secretions of harvestmen (all suborders except Laniatores), methyl-ketones and chloro-naphthoquinones arise as linking elements between cyphophthalmid and dyspnoan scent gland chemistry.Entities:
Keywords: Methyl-ketones; Naphthoquinones; Nemastomatidae; Scent glands; Sclerosomatid compounds
Year: 2018 PMID: 29670318 PMCID: PMC5897473 DOI: 10.1007/s00049-018-0257-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chemoecology ISSN: 0937-7409 Impact factor: 1.725
Fig. 1A female of Nemastoma triste (from Gesäuse, Styria, Austria)
Collection data: in total, 142 individuals of Nemastoma triste were used for this study
| Collection date | Locations | Geographic coordinates | No of specimens |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05.08.2012 | AUT: Styria, Lassing, Blosen | 47.517027, 14.272837 | 1 ♀ |
| 14.08.2012 | SLO: Dravograd, Mount Košenjak | 46.641801, 15.034167 | 17♀♀,11♂♂ |
| 11.09.2012 | AUT: Salzburg, Kaprun, Sigmund Thun Klamm | 47.257932, 12.737773 | 1 individual |
| 14.09.2012 | AUT: Styria, Präbichl | 47.51667, 14.95 | 1 ♀, 2 ♂♂ |
| 14.09.2012 | AUT: Styria, Peggau, Lurgrotte | 47.201588, 15.353340 | 1 ♀ |
| 14.09.2012 | AUT: Styria, Reiteregg, Feistritzhöhe | 47.05, 15.266667 | 1 ♀ |
| 07.05.2013 | AUT: Styria, Soboth, Schweig | 46.721111, 15.083056 | 3 individuals |
| 08.07.2017 | AUT: Styria, Gesäuse, Hartelsgraben | 47.566786, 14.697167 | 1 ♀, 1♂ |
| 09.08.2017 | SLO: Sv. Urban | 46.649798, 15.073275 | 1♀, 2 ♂♂ |
| 23.08.2017 | SLO: Rateče, Mount Peč | 46.523389, 13.715948 | 4 ♀♀, 2 ♂♂ |
| 23.08.2017 | SLO: Jelendol, Mount Gromov | 46.422556, 14.357833 | 7 ♀♀, 15 ♂♂ |
| 05.09.2017 | SLO: Sadonikhöhe | 46.335194, 14.597833 | 1 ♀, 5 ♂♂ |
| 23.09.2017 | SLO: Rateče, Mount Peč | 46.523389, 13.715944 | 11 ♀♀, 11 ♂♂ |
| 12.10.2017 | AUT: Styria, Fischbacher Alpen, Pfaffen | 47.557778, 15.796667 | 10 ♀♀, 2 ♂♂ |
| 16.10.2017 | AUT: Salzburg, Lungau, Lessach | 47.200833, 13.796389 | 10♀♀, 9 ♂♂ |
| 17.10.2017 | AUT: Salzburg, Lungau, Sauerfeld | 47.122222, 13.885278 | 7 ♀♀, 5 ♂♂ |
AUT Austria, SLO Slovenia
Fig. 2Gas chromatographic profiles of the scent gland secretion of Nemastoma triste. a “Full profile” of an individual with well-filled glands; b “reduced profile” of an individual with partly emptied glands (see text for details). Peak A (heptan-2-one), B (5-methyl-heptan-2-one), C (nonan-2-one), D (6-methyl-nonan-2-one), E (1,4-naphthoquinone), F (6-tridecen-2-one), G (8-tridecen-2-one), H (6-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone), I (4-chloro-1,2-naphthoquinone), J (4-chloro-6-methyl-1,2-naphthoquinone)
Gas chromatographic and mass spectrometric data to the scent gland secretion of Nemastoma triste
| Peak | RI measured (authentic reference) | Mass spectrometric fragmentation | Identified as | Structure | Relative amountc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 892 (891a) | Heptan-2-one |
| 40 ± 12 | |
| B | 964 (971b) | 5-Methyl-heptan-2-one |
| 12 ± 4 | |
| C | 1091 (1092) | Nonan-2-one |
| 3 ± 1 | |
| D | 1050 (1051) | 6-Methyl-nonan-2-one |
| 13 ± 5 | |
| E | 1420 (1419) | 160 (M + 2, 15), 159 (M + 1, 13), | 1,4-Naphthoquinone |
| 5 ± 4 |
| F | 1473 (1473) | 6-Tridecen-2-one |
| < 1 | |
| G | 1483 | 8-Tridecen-2-one |
| 19 ± 7 | |
| H | 1544 (1544) | 174 (M + 2, 10), 173 (M + 1, 12), | 6-Methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone |
| 9 ± 5 |
| I | 1605 (1604) | 4-Chloro-1,2-naphthoquinone |
| < 1 | |
| J | 1734 (1736) | 4-Chloro-6-methyl-1,2-naphthoquinone |
| < 1 |
The molecular ion (M+) is marked in bold. Retention indices (RI) were calculated according to van den Dool and Kratz (1963)
aRI as reported by Methven et al. (2007)
bRI as reported by Owens et al. (1997)
cGiven in % of peak area of particular compounds relative to the total area of all secretion compounds. The values refer to “full profiles” (n = 28) as described in the text
Fig. 3Comparison of individual scent gland secretion-profiles by non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) using the Bray–Curtis index of dissimilarity, indicating homogeneity of profiles. a Males and females (26 out of 28 “full” extracts considered; for the remaining 2 extracts, the sex of extracted individuals was not determined); b individuals from 5 different populations in Austria and Slovenia (all 28 “full” profiles considered)