David Y Chiang1,2,3, Katherina M Alsina2,4, Eleonora Corradini3,5, Martin Fitzpatrick3,5, Li Ni2,6, Satadru K Lahiri2,6, Julia O Reynolds6, Xiaolu Pan6, Larry Scott2,6, Albert J R Heck3,5, Xander H T Wehrens2,6,7. 1. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.Y.C.). 2. Cardiovascular Research Institute (D.Y.C., K.M.A., L.N., S.K.L., L.S., X.H.T.W.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. 3. Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands (D.Y.C., E.C., M.F., A.J.R.H.). 4. Integrative Molecular and Biomedical Sciences (K.M.A.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. 5. Netherlands Proteomics Centre, Utrecht (E.C., M.F., A.J.R.H.). 6. Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics (L.N., S.K.L., J.O.R., X.P., L.S., X.H.T.W.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. 7. Department of Medicine (Cardiology) (X.H.T.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (Cardiology) (X.H.T.W.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a complex disease with a rising prevalence despite advances in treatment. Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) has long been implicated in HF pathogenesis, but its exact role is both unclear and controversial. Most previous studies measured only the PP1 catalytic subunit (PP1c) without investigating its diverse set of interactors, which confer localization and substrate specificity to the holoenzyme. In this study, we define the PP1 interactome in cardiac tissue and test the hypothesis that this interactome becomes rearranged during HF progression at the level of specific PP1c interactors. METHODS: Mice were subjected to transverse aortic constriction and grouped on the basis of ejection fraction into sham, hypertrophy, moderate HF (ejection fraction, 30%-40%), and severe HF (ejection fraction <30%). Cardiac lysates were subjected to affinity purification with anti-PP1c antibodies followed by high-resolution mass spectrometry. PP1 regulatory subunit 7 (Ppp1r7) was knocked down in mouse cardiomyocytes and HeLa cells with adeno-associated virus serotype 9 and siRNA, respectively. Calcium imaging was performed on isolated ventricular myocytes. RESULTS: Seventy-one and 98 PP1c interactors were quantified from mouse cardiac and HeLa lysates, respectively, including many novel interactors and protein complexes. This represents the largest reproducible PP1 interactome data set ever captured from any tissue, including both primary and secondary/tertiary interactors. Nine PP1c interactors with changes in their binding to PP1c were strongly associated with HF progression, including 2 known (Ppp1r7 and Ppp1r18) and 7 novel interactors. Within the entire cardiac PP1 interactome, Ppp1r7 had the highest binding to PP1c. Cardiac-specific knockdown in mice led to cardiac dysfunction and disruption of calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. CONCLUSIONS: PP1 is best studied at the level of its interactome, which undergoes significant rearrangement during HF progression. The 9 key interactors that are associated with HF progression may represent potential targets in HF therapy. In particular, Ppp1r7 may play a central role in regulating the PP1 interactome by acting as a competitive molecular "sponge" of PP1c.
BACKGROUND:Heart failure (HF) is a complex disease with a rising prevalence despite advances in treatment. Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) has long been implicated in HF pathogenesis, but its exact role is both unclear and controversial. Most previous studies measured only the PP1 catalytic subunit (PP1c) without investigating its diverse set of interactors, which confer localization and substrate specificity to the holoenzyme. In this study, we define the PP1 interactome in cardiac tissue and test the hypothesis that this interactome becomes rearranged during HF progression at the level of specific PP1c interactors. METHODS:Mice were subjected to transverse aortic constriction and grouped on the basis of ejection fraction into sham, hypertrophy, moderate HF (ejection fraction, 30%-40%), and severe HF (ejection fraction <30%). Cardiac lysates were subjected to affinity purification with anti-PP1c antibodies followed by high-resolution mass spectrometry. PP1 regulatory subunit 7 (Ppp1r7) was knocked down in mouse cardiomyocytes and HeLa cells with adeno-associated virus serotype 9 and siRNA, respectively. Calcium imaging was performed on isolated ventricular myocytes. RESULTS: Seventy-one and 98 PP1c interactors were quantified from mouse cardiac and HeLa lysates, respectively, including many novel interactors and protein complexes. This represents the largest reproducible PP1 interactome data set ever captured from any tissue, including both primary and secondary/tertiary interactors. Nine PP1c interactors with changes in their binding to PP1c were strongly associated with HF progression, including 2 known (Ppp1r7 and Ppp1r18) and 7 novel interactors. Within the entire cardiac PP1 interactome, Ppp1r7 had the highest binding to PP1c. Cardiac-specific knockdown in mice led to cardiac dysfunction and disruption of calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. CONCLUSIONS:PP1 is best studied at the level of its interactome, which undergoes significant rearrangement during HF progression. The 9 key interactors that are associated with HF progression may represent potential targets in HF therapy. In particular, Ppp1r7 may play a central role in regulating the PP1 interactome by acting as a competitive molecular "sponge" of PP1c.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ppp1r7 protein, mouse; heart failure; mass spectrometry; protein phosphatase 1; proteomics
Authors: Uwe Kirchhefer; Hideo A Baba; Peter Bokník; Kristine M Breeden; Nirmala Mavila; Nicole Brüchert; Isabel Justus; Marek Matus; Wilhelm Schmitz; Anna A Depaoli-Roach; Joachim Neumann Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Stephanie Grote-Wessels; Hideo A Baba; Peter Boknik; Ali El-Armouche; Larissa Fabritz; Hans-Jörg Gillmann; Dana Kucerova; Marek Matus; Frank U Müller; Joachim Neumann; Martina Schmitz; Frank Stümpel; Gregor Theilmeier; Jeremias Wohlschlaeger; Wilhelm Schmitz; Uwe Kirchhefer Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2008-05-03 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Mihail G Chelu; Satyam Sarma; Subeena Sood; Sufen Wang; Ralph J van Oort; Darlene G Skapura; Na Li; Marco Santonastasi; Frank Ulrich Müller; Wilhelm Schmitz; Ulrich Schotten; Mark E Anderson; Miguel Valderrábano; Dobromir Dobrev; Xander H T Wehrens Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Katrin Wittköpper; Larissa Fabritz; Stefan Neef; Katharina R Ort; Clemens Grefe; Bernhard Unsöld; Paulus Kirchhof; Lars S Maier; Gerd Hasenfuss; Dobromir Dobrev; Thomas Eschenhagen; Ali El-Armouche Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2010-01-11 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Ali El-Armouche; Katrin Wittköpper; Franziska Degenhardt; Florian Weinberger; Michael Didié; Ivan Melnychenko; Michael Grimm; Micha Peeck; Wolfram H Zimmermann; Bernhard Unsöld; Gerd Hasenfuss; Dobromir Dobrev; Thomas Eschenhagen Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2008-08-08 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Katherina M Alsina; Mohit Hulsurkar; Sören Brandenburg; Daniel Kownatzki-Danger; Christof Lenz; Henning Urlaub; Issam Abu-Taha; Markus Kamler; David Y Chiang; Satadru K Lahiri; Julia O Reynolds; Ann P Quick; Larry Scott; Tarah A Word; Maria D Gelves; Albert J R Heck; Na Li; Dobromir Dobrev; Stephan E Lehnart; Xander H T Wehrens Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mohit M Hulsurkar; Satadru K Lahiri; Jason Karch; Meng C Wang; Xander H T Wehrens Journal: Expert Opin Ther Targets Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 6.797
Authors: Lulu Wang; Wei Wang; Hannah C Beird; Xueqian Cheng; Hong Fang; Guilin Tang; Gokce A Toruner; C Cameron Yin; M James You; Ghayas C Issa; Gautam Borthakur; Guang Peng; Joseph D Khoury; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Zhenya Tang Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 4.141