Literature DB >> 29669216

Is use of homeopathy associated with poor prescribing in English primary care? A cross-sectional study.

Alex J Walker1, Richard Croker1, Seb Bacon1, Edzard Ernst2, Helen J Curtis1, Ben Goldacre1.   

Abstract

Objectives Prescribing of homeopathy still occurs in a small minority of English general practices. We hypothesised that practices that prescribe any homeopathic preparations might differ in their prescribing of other drugs. Design Cross-sectional analysis. Setting English primary care. Participants English general practices. Main outcome measures We identified practices that made any homeopathy prescriptions over six months of data. We measured associations with four prescribing and two practice quality indicators using multivariable logistic regression. Results Only 8.5% of practices (644) prescribed homeopathy between December 2016 and May 2017. Practices in the worst-scoring quartile for a composite measure of prescribing quality (>51.4 mean percentile) were 2.1 times more likely to prescribe homeopathy than those in the best category (<40.3) (95% confidence interval: 1.6-2.8). Aggregate savings from the subset of these measures where a cost saving could be calculated were also strongly associated (highest vs. lowest quartile multivariable odds ratio: 2.9, confidence interval: 2.1-4.1). Of practices spending the most on medicines identified as 'low value' by NHS England, 12.8% prescribed homeopathy, compared to 3.9% for lowest spenders (multivariable odds ratio: 2.6, confidence interval: 1.9-3.6). Of practices in the worst category for aggregated price-per-unit cost savings, 12.7% prescribed homeopathy, compared to 3.5% in the best category (multivariable odds ratio: 2.7, confidence interval: 1.9-3.9). Practice quality outcomes framework scores and patient recommendation rates were not associated with prescribing homeopathy (odds ratio range: 0.9-1.2). Conclusions Even infrequent homeopathy prescribing is strongly associated with poor performance on a range of prescribing quality measures, but not with overall patient recommendation or quality outcomes framework score. The association is unlikely to be a direct causal relationship, but may reflect underlying practice features, such as the extent of respect for evidence-based practice, or poorer stewardship of the prescribing budget.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Homeopathy; OpenPrescribing; prescribing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29669216      PMCID: PMC5958361          DOI: 10.1177/0141076818765779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  11 in total

1.  Is quantum entanglement in homeopathy a reality?

Authors:  Peter Fisher
Journal:  Homeopathy       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.444

2.  Paediatric homoeopathy in general practice: where, when and why?

Authors:  Suzie Ekins-Daukes; Peter J Helms; Michael W Taylor; Colin R Simpson; James S McLay
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Characteristics of patients consulting their regular primary care physician according to their prescribing preferences for homeopathy and complementary medicine.

Authors:  France Lert; Lamiae Grimaldi-Bensouda; Frederic Rouillon; Jacques Massol; Didier Guillemot; Bernard Avouac; Gerard Duru; Anne-Marie Magnier; Michel Rossignol; Lucien Abenhaim; Bernard Begaud
Journal:  Homeopathy       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.444

4.  Providing Complementary and Alternative Medicine in primary care: the primary care workers' perspective.

Authors:  R A van Haselen; U Reiber; I Nickel; A Jakob; P A G Fisher
Journal:  Complement Ther Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.446

Review 5.  Homeopathy for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder or hyperkinetic disorder.

Authors:  M K Coulter; M E Dean
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

Review 6.  Homeopathy for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Emily J Peckham; E Andrea Nelson; Joanne Greenhalgh; Katy Cooper; E Rachel Roberts; Anurag Agrawal
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-11-13

7.  Usage and Attitudes Towards Natural Remedies and Homeopathy in General Pediatrics: A Cross-Country Overview.

Authors:  André-Michael Beer; Ievgeniia Burlaka; Stephen Buskin; Borislav Kamenov; Andrea Pettenazzo; Diana Popova; María Pilar Riveros Huckstadt; Virgilijus Sakalinskas; Menachem Oberbaum
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2016-07-01

8.  How do medical students engaging in elective courses on acupuncture and homeopathy differ from unselected students? A survey.

Authors:  Alexandra Jocham; Levente Kriston; Pascal O Berberat; Antonius Schneider; Klaus Linde
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.659

9.  New mechanism to identify cost savings in English NHS prescribing: minimising 'price per unit', a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Richard Croker; Alex J Walker; Seb Bacon; Helen J Curtis; Lisa French; Ben Goldacre
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Complementary or alternative? The use of homeopathic products and antibiotics amongst pre-school children.

Authors:  Lesley Wye; Alastair D Hay; Kate Northstone; Jackie Bishop; Judith Headley; Elizabeth Thompson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.497

View more
  3 in total

1.  The social and environmental determinants of mental health.

Authors:  Kamran Abbasi
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care.

Authors:  Brian MacKenna; Helen J Curtis; Alex J Walker; Richard Croker; Seb Bacon; Ben Goldacre
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  The usage of over-the-counter products by private insured patients in Germany - a claims data analysis with focus on complementary medicine.

Authors:  Katja Goetz; Matthias Kalder; Ute-Susann Albert; Christian O Jacke
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.