Katharina Schönauen1, Nha Le1,2, Ulrike von Arnim1, Christian Schulz1,3, Peter Malfertheiner1, Alexander Link1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany. 2. Gastroenterology Division, First Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. 3. Department of Medicine II, Klinikum der Universität München (KUM), Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
Background: Assessment of the disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is essential for adequate treatment management and reliable noninvasive biomarkers for verification of mucosal healing are still needed. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are differentially expressed in IBD and cancer. We aimed to evaluate the potential of circulating and fecal miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for IBD. Methods: In this proof-of-principle study we used 2 independent patient cohorts. Testing cohort (n = 96) included serum and fecal samples from controls (n = 35) and IBD patients (n = 61) including 43 patients with Crohn's disease (CD), 18 with ulcerative colitis (UC) with an active disease (n = 38), or in remission (n = 23). Validation cohort included fecal samples from patients with calprotectin/endoscopy-confirmed active disease (n = 30) or in remission (n = 15). Target-based approach (miR-16, miR-21, miR-155, and miR-223) has been used to evaluate miRNA expression. Results: Sera samples from IBD patients showed higher level of miR-16, miR-21, and miR-223, but not miR-155, compared to controls and was higher in CD than in UC patients. Much stronger miRNA expression changes were observed in feces from IBD patients for all studied miRNAs with highest expression of miR-155 and miR-223 in testing and validation cohorts. MiRNA expression correlated with clinical remission, however, only fecal but not circulating miRNAs, correlated with surrogate parameters such as fecal calprotectin or C-reactive protein. Conclusions: Our data provide a novel evidence for differential expression level of fecal miRNAs in IBD. We demonstrate that miRNAs in feces correlate with disease activity and may be considered as potential tool for the further biomarker research in IBD. 10.1093/ibd/izy046_video1izy046.video15794822319001.
Background: Assessment of the disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is essential for adequate treatment management and reliable noninvasive biomarkers for verification of mucosal healing are still needed. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are differentially expressed in IBD and cancer. We aimed to evaluate the potential of circulating and fecal miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for IBD. Methods: In this proof-of-principle study we used 2 independent patient cohorts. Testing cohort (n = 96) included serum and fecal samples from controls (n = 35) and IBDpatients (n = 61) including 43 patients with Crohn's disease (CD), 18 with ulcerative colitis (UC) with an active disease (n = 38), or in remission (n = 23). Validation cohort included fecal samples from patients with calprotectin/endoscopy-confirmed active disease (n = 30) or in remission (n = 15). Target-based approach (miR-16, miR-21, miR-155, and miR-223) has been used to evaluate miRNA expression. Results: Sera samples from IBDpatients showed higher level of miR-16, miR-21, and miR-223, but not miR-155, compared to controls and was higher in CD than in UC patients. Much stronger miRNA expression changes were observed in feces from IBDpatients for all studied miRNAs with highest expression of miR-155 and miR-223 in testing and validation cohorts. MiRNA expression correlated with clinical remission, however, only fecal but not circulating miRNAs, correlated with surrogate parameters such as fecal calprotectin or C-reactive protein. Conclusions: Our data provide a novel evidence for differential expression level of fecal miRNAs in IBD. We demonstrate that miRNAs in feces correlate with disease activity and may be considered as potential tool for the further biomarker research in IBD. 10.1093/ibd/izy046_video1izy046.video15794822319001.
Authors: Shirong Liu; Rafael M Rezende; Thais G Moreira; Stephanie K Tankou; Laura M Cox; Meng Wu; Anya Song; Fyonn H Dhang; Zhiyun Wei; Gianluca Costamagna; Howard L Weiner Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 21.023
Authors: Yu Zheng Wu; Kathy Yuen Yee Chan; Kam Tong Leung; Hugh Simon Lam; Yuk Him Tam; Kim Hung Lee; Karen Li; Pak Cheung Ng Journal: FEBS Open Bio Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 2.693
Authors: Christian T Wohnhaas; Ramona Schmid; Marcel Rolser; Eric Kaaru; Dominik Langgartner; Kathrin Rieber; Benjamin Strobel; Claudia Eisele; Franziska Wiech; Ines Jakob; Florian Gantner; Ivona Herichova; Richard Vinisko; Wulf O Böcher; Sudha Visvanathan; Fei Shen; Mark Panzenbeck; Ernest Raymond; Stefan O Reber; Denis Delić; Patrick Baum Journal: Crohns Colitis 360 Date: 2020-02-14
Authors: Małgorzata Guz; Tomasz Dworzański; Witold Jeleniewicz; Marek Cybulski; Joanna Kozicka; Andrzej Stepulak; Krzysztof Celiński Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 3.411