| Literature DB >> 29668702 |
Jing Li1,2,3, Xueping Wu1, Mesfin Tsegaye Gebremikael3, Huijun Wu1, Dianxiong Cai1, Bisheng Wang1, Baoguo Li2, Jiancheng Zhang4, Yongshan Li5, Jilong Xi5.
Abstract
Microbial mechanisms associated with soil organic carbon (SOC) decomposition are poorly understood. We aim to determine the effects of inorganic and organic fertilizers on soil labile carbon (C) pools, microbial community structure and C mineralization rate under an intensive wheat-maize double cropping system in Northern China. Soil samples in 0-10 cm layer were collected from a nine-year field trial involved four treatments: no fertilizer, CK; nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilizers, NP; maize straw combined with NP fertilizers, NPS; and manure plus straw and NP fertilizers, NPSM. Soil samples were analyzed to determine labile C pools (including dissolved organic C, DOC; light free organic C, LFOC; and microbial biomass C, MBC), microbial community composition (using phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) profiles) and SOC mineralization rate (from a 124-day incubation experiment). This study demonstrated that the application of chemical fertilizers (NP) alone did not alter labile C fractions, soil microbial communities and SOC mineralization rate from those observed in the CK treatment. Whereas the use of straw in conjunction with chemical fertilizers (NPS) became an additional labile substrate supply that decreased C limitation, stimulated growth of all PLFA-related microbial communities, and resulted in 53% higher cumulative mineralization of C compared to that of CK. The SOC and its labile fractions explained 78.7% of the variance of microbial community structure. Further addition of manure on the top of straw in the NPSM treatment did not significantly increase microbial community abundances, but it did alter microbial community structure by increasing G+/G- ratio compared to that of NPS. The cumulative mineralization of C was 85% higher under NPSM fertilization compared to that of CK. Particularly, the NPSM treatment increased the mineralization rate of the resistant pool. This has to be carefully taken into account when setting realistic and effective goals for long-term soil C stabilization.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29668702 PMCID: PMC5905960 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Organic C contents and C/N ratios of bulk soil and labile fractions under different fertilization regimes.
Error bars represent standard error of the means (n = 3).
Fig 2Abundance of microbial biomarker groups under different fertilization regimes.
Error bars represent standard error of the means (n = 3).
Fig 3Redundancy analysis (RDA) of the soil microbial communities constrained by labile organic C fractions.
Fig 4Cumulative CO2 emission over time under different fertilization regimes.
Error bars represent standard error of the means (n = 3).
The parameters of curve fittings for all mineralization data using a parallel first-plus-zero-order kinetic model.
Values are the means±SD (n = 3).
| Treatment | Cmin | C0 | R2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 891±131c | 553±104b | 0.046±0.001a | 2.82±0.29b | 0.998 |
| NP | 1040±152c | 717±136b | 0.047±0.004a | 2.68±0.38b | 0.999 |
| NPS | 1364±149b | 987±147a | 0.048±0.001a | 3.33±0.31b | 0.998 |
| NPSM | 1653±133a | 1122±81a | 0.052±0.007a | 4.42±0.6a | 0.999 |
Values followed by same letters within each column are not significantly different (P<0.05)
Pearson correlation between soil C mineralization parameters, C contents and C/N of labile fractions and microbial communities (n = 12).
| Cmin | C0 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOC | 0.895 | 0.855 | 0.488 | 0.667 |
| DOC | 0.833 | 0.734 | 0.702 | 0.708 |
| LFOC | 0.798 | 0.787 | 0.419 | 0.537 |
| MBC | 0.859 | 0.789 | 0.678 | 0.669 |
| C/N | 0.211 | 0.240 | 0.157 | 0.164 |
| DOC/DON | -0.321 | -0.380 | 0.262 | 0.109 |
| LFOC/LFN | -0.246 | -0.371 | -0.180 | -0.211 |
| MBC/MBN | 0.559 | 0.465 | 0.600 | 0.607 |
| G+ | 0.987 | 0.962 | 0.473 | 0.701 |
| G- | 0.890 | 0.921 | 0.389 | 0.533 |
| Actinomycetes | 0.951 | 0.931 | 0.404 | 0.721 |
| Saprophy fungi | 0.938 | 0.937 | 0.443 | 0.649 |
| AMF | 0.950 | 0.934 | 0.406 | 0.694 |
| G+/G- | 0.718 | 0.639 | 0.305 | 0.739 |
| F/B | 0.613 | 0.605 | 0.065 | 0.554 |
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.