Literature DB >> 29668505

Comparison of Functional Results After Cross-Face Nerve Graft-, Spinal Accessory Nerve-, and Masseter Nerve-Innervated Gracilis for Facial Paralysis Reconstruction: The Chang Gung Experience.

David Chwei-Chin Chuang1, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang, Vincent G Laurence.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Using functioning free muscle transplantation (FFMT) for facial paralysis and postparalysis facial synkinesis reconstruction is our preferred technique. Gracilis was the first choice of muscle. Three motor neurotizers: cross-face nerve graft (CFNG), spinal accessory nerve (XI) and masseter nerve (V3) have been used as neurotizers for different indications.
METHODS: A total of 362 cases of facial reanimation with FFMT were performed between 1986 and 2015. Of these, 350 patients with 361 FFMT were enrolled: 272 (78%) patients were treated by CFNG-gracilis, 56 (15%) by XI-gracilis, and 22 (6%) by V3-gracilis. Smile excursion score, cortical adaptation stage with tickle test for spontaneous smile, facial synkinesis, satisfaction score by questionnaire, and functional facial grading were used for outcome assessment.
RESULTS: The CFNG-gracilis in a 2-stage procedure achieved most natural and spontaneous smile when longer observation (≥2 years) was followed. The single-stage procedure using the XI-gracilis has proven a good alternative. V3-gracilis provided high smile excursion score in the shortest rehabilitation period, but never obtained spontaneous smile.
CONCLUSIONS: The CFNG-gracilis remains our first choice for facial paralysis reconstruction which can achieve natural and spontaneous smile. XI- or V3-gracilis can be selected as a save procedure when CFNG-gracilis fails. The V3-gracilis is indicated in some specific conditions, such as bilateral Möbius syndrome, older patients (age, >70 years), or patients with malignant disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29668505     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Comprehensive Approach to Facial Reanimation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Milosz Pinkiewicz; Karolina Dorobisz; Tomasz Zatoński
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Cross Facial Nerve Grafting for Smile Restoration: Thoughts on Improving Graft Inset.

Authors:  Evgenios Evgeniou; Dalia N Mitchell; Shai M Rozen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-06-06

Review 3.  Facial Nerve Repair: Bioengineering Approaches in Preclinical Models.

Authors:  Fuat Baris Bengur; Conrad Stoy; Mary A Binko; Wayne Vincent Nerone; Caroline Nadia Fedor; Mario G Solari; Kacey G Marra
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 7.376

4.  Nonmicrosurgical Grafting for Facial Nerve Branches with Permanent Sensational Functional Outcome.

Authors:  Yasser Helmy Ali; Abd El-Fattah Al Sheikh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-05-16

5.  Masseter nerve-based facial palsy reconstruction.

Authors:  Hojin Park; Seong Su Jeong; Tae Suk Oh
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2020-12-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.