Literature DB >> 29668394

It's the Other Way Around! Early Modulation of Sensory Distractor Processing Induced by Late Response Conflict.

Bernhard Pastötter1, Christian Frings1.   

Abstract

Understanding the neural processes that maintain goal-directed behavior is a major challenge for the study of attentional control. Although much of the previous work on the issue has focused on prefrontal brain areas, little is known about the contribution of sensory brain processes to the regulation of attentional control. The present EEG study examined brain oscillatory activities invoked in the processing of response conflict in a lateralized Eriksen single-flanker task, in which target letters were presented at fixation and single distractor letters were presented either left or right to the targets. Distractors were response compatible, response incompatible, or neutral in relation to the responses associated with the targets. The behavioral results showed that responses to targets in incompatible trials were slower and more error prone than responses in compatible trials. The electrophysiological results revealed an early sensory lateralization effect in (both evoked and induced) theta power (3-6 Hz) that was more pronounced in incompatible than compatible trials. The sensory lateralization effect preceded in time a midfrontal conflict effect that was indexed by an increase of (induced) theta power (6-9 Hz) in incompatible compared with compatible trials. The findings indicate an early modulation of sensory distractor processing induced by response conflict. Theoretical implications of the findings, in particular with respect to the theory of event coding and theories relating to stimulus-response binding [Henson, R. N., Eckstein, D., Waszak, F., Frings, C., & Horner, A. Stimulus-response bindings in priming. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 376-384, 2014; Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878, 2001], are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29668394     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Motor Interference, But Not Sensory Interference, Increases Midfrontal Theta Activity and Brain Synchronization during Reactive Control.

Authors:  Jakob Kaiser; Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Decoding Stimulus-Response Representations and Their Stability Using EEG-Based Multivariate Pattern Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Takacs; Moritz Mückschel; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-05-07

3.  Target Amplification and Distractor Inhibition: Theta Oscillatory Dynamics of Selective Attention in a Flanker Task.

Authors:  Céline C Haciahmet; Christian Frings; Bernhard Pastötter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Neurophysiological correlates of perception-action binding in the somatosensory system.

Authors:  Julia Friedrich; Julius Verrel; Maximilian Kleimaker; Alexander Münchau; Christian Beste; Tobias Bäumer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  On the functional role of striatal and anterior cingulate GABA+ in stimulus-response binding.

Authors:  Adam Takacs; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Paul Kuntke; Annett Werner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 5.038

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.