Literature DB >> 29668386

Neck muscle biomechanics and neural control.

Jason B Fice1, Gunter P Siegmund1,2, Jean-Sébastien Blouin1,3.   

Abstract

The mechanics, morphometry, and geometry of our joints, segments, and muscles are fundamental biomechanical properties intrinsic to human neural control. The goal of our study was to investigate whether the biomechanical actions of individual neck muscles predict their neural control. Specifically, we compared the moment direction and variability produced by electrical stimulation of a neck muscle (biomechanics) to the preferred activation direction and variability (neural control). Subjects sat upright with their head fixed to a six-axis load cell and their torso restrained. Indwelling wire electrodes were placed into the sternocleidomastoid (SCM), splenius capitis (SPL), and semispinalis capitis (SSC) muscles. The electrically stimulated direction was defined as the moment direction produced when a current (2-19 mA) was passed through each muscle's electrodes. Preferred activation direction was defined as the vector sum of the spatial tuning curve built from root mean squared electromyogram when subjects produced isometric moments at 7.5% and 15% of their maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) in 26 three-dimensional directions. The spatial tuning curves at 15% MVC were well defined (unimodal, P < 0.05), and their preferred directions were 23°, 39°, and 21° different from their electrically stimulated directions for the SCM, SPL, and SSC, respectively ( P < 0.05). Intrasubject variability was smaller in electrically stimulated moment directions compared with voluntary preferred directions, and intrasubject variability decreased with increased activation levels. Our findings show that the neural control of neck muscles is not based solely on optimizing individual muscle biomechanics but, as activation increases, biomechanical constraints in part dictate the activation of synergistic neck muscles. NEW &amp; NOTEWORTHY Biomechanics are an intrinsic part of human neural control. In this study, we found that the biomechanics of individual neck muscles cannot fully predict their neural control. Consequently, physiologically based computational neck muscle controllers cannot calculate muscle activation schemes based on the isolated biomechanics of muscles. Furthermore, by measuring biomechanics we showed that the intrasubject variability of the neural control was lower for electrical vs. voluntary activation of the neck muscles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; electrical muscle stimulation; neck muscle; neural control; spatial tuning curves

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29668386      PMCID: PMC6093957          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00512.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  36 in total

Review 1.  Computational mechanisms of sensorimotor control.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Muscle activity determined by cosine tuning with a nontrivial preferred direction during isometric force exertion by lower limb.

Authors:  Daichi Nozaki; Kimitaka Nakazawa; Masami Akai
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A three-dimensional biomechanical evaluation of quadriceps and hamstrings function using electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Betsy V Hunter; Darryl G Thelen; Yasin Y Dhaher
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Neck muscle paths and moment arms are significantly affected by wrapping surface parameters.

Authors:  Bethany L Suderman; Bala Krishnamoorthy; Anita N Vasavada
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 1.763

5.  Biomechanical model of the human knee evaluated by neuromuscular stimulation.

Authors:  R Riener; J Quintern; G Schmidt
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Coordination and inhomogeneous activation of human arm muscles during isometric torques.

Authors:  E J van Zuylen; C C Gielen; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Effects of stimulation intensity on the physiological responses of human motor units.

Authors:  S A Binder-Macleod; E E Halden; K A Jungles
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Responses of different compartments of cat's splenius muscle to optokinetic stimulation.

Authors:  V J Wilson; W Precht; N Dieringer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Dynamic spatial tuning of cervical muscle reflexes to multidirectional seated perturbations.

Authors:  Jóna Marín Ólafsdóttir; Karin Brolin; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Gunter P Siegmund
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  New look at force-frequency relationship of human skeletal muscle: effects of fatigue.

Authors:  S A Binder-Macleod; S C Lee; A D Fritz; L J Kucharski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dynamic Spatial Tuning Patterns of Shoulder Muscles with Volunteers in a Driving Posture.

Authors:  Jason B Fice; Emma Larsson; Johan Davidsson
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.