Per Loftås1, Margrét Sturludóttir2,3, Olof Hallböök1, Karin Almlöv4, Gunnar Arbman4, Lennart Blomqvist2,3. 1. 1 Department of Surgery, Institution for clinical and experimental medicine, Linköping University , Linköping , Sweden. 2. 2 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University hospital , Stockholm , Sweden. 3. 3 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden. 4. 4 Department of Surgery, Institution for clinical and experimental medicine, Linköping University , Norrköping , Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of MRI to predict remaining lymph node metastases in patients with complete pathological luminal response (ypT0) after neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Data from a national registry were used. 19 patients with histopathologically remaining lymph node metastases (ypT0N+) were identified. Another 19 patients without lymph node metastases (ypT0N0) were used as matched controls. Two radiologists blinded to all patient information evaluated staging and restaging MRI that was compared to histopathological findings of the resected specimen. RESULTS: The average size of the largest lymph node on restaging MRI was significantly larger (4.5 mm) in the ypT0N+ group than in the ypT0N0 group (2.6 mm) (p = 0.04). Presence of ypN+ was correctly predicted by MRI in 7 of 19 patients. In patients without lymph node metastases (ypT0N0), these were correctly classified by MRI in 16 of 19 patients. All patients who had MR-identified lymph nodes larger than 8 mm at restaging were ypTN+. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative for prediction of remaining lymph node metastasis with MRI were 37, 84, 70 and 57%. CONCLUSION: In patients with ypT0 in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment, remaining regional lymph node metastases cannot safely be predicted by restaging MRI alone using presently known criteria. Presence of a lymph node over 8 mm on restaging MRI strongly indicates yPN+. Advances in knowledge: This is one of the first studies on MRI lymph node assessment after chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) in luminal complete response.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of MRI to predict remaining lymph node metastases in patients with complete pathological luminal response (ypT0) after neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Data from a national registry were used. 19 patients with histopathologically remaining lymph node metastases (ypT0N+) were identified. Another 19 patients without lymph node metastases (ypT0N0) were used as matched controls. Two radiologists blinded to all patient information evaluated staging and restaging MRI that was compared to histopathological findings of the resected specimen. RESULTS: The average size of the largest lymph node on restaging MRI was significantly larger (4.5 mm) in the ypT0N+ group than in the ypT0N0 group (2.6 mm) (p = 0.04). Presence of ypN+ was correctly predicted by MRI in 7 of 19 patients. In patients without lymph node metastases (ypT0N0), these were correctly classified by MRI in 16 of 19 patients. All patients who had MR-identified lymph nodes larger than 8 mm at restaging were ypTN+. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative for prediction of remaining lymph node metastasis with MRI were 37, 84, 70 and 57%. CONCLUSION: In patients with ypT0 in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment, remaining regional lymph node metastases cannot safely be predicted by restaging MRI alone using presently known criteria. Presence of a lymph node over 8 mm on restaging MRI strongly indicates yPN+. Advances in knowledge: This is one of the first studies on MRI lymph node assessment after chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) in luminal complete response.
Authors: Dow-Mu Koh; Ian Chau; Diana Tait; Andrew Wotherspoon; David Cunningham; Gina Brown Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-12-31 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Isabelle Bedrosian; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Barry Feig; Kelly K Hunt; Lee Ellis; Steven A Curley; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Marc Delclos; Christopher Crane; Nora Janjan; John M Skibber Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Miriam M van Heeswijk; Doenja M J Lambregts; Walter M Palm; Babs M F Hendriks; Monique Maas; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2016-12-13 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: S E Vollenbrock; F E M Voncken; J M van Dieren; D M J Lambregts; M Maas; G J Meijer; L Goense; S Mook; K J Hartemink; P Snaebjornsson; L C Ter Beek; M Verheij; B M P Aleman; R G H Beets-Tan; A Bartels-Rutten Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Fernando López-Campos; Margarita Martín-Martín; Roberto Fornell-Pérez; Juan Carlos García-Pérez; Javier Die-Trill; Raquel Fuentes-Mateos; Sergio López-Durán; José Domínguez-Rullán; Reyes Ferreiro; Alejandro Riquelme-Oliveira; Asunción Hervás-Morón; Felipe Couñago Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-08-07 Impact factor: 5.742