Literature DB >> 29667312

Predatory publishing and cybercrime targeting academics.

Mary Grace Umlauf1, Yuki Mochizuki2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this report is to inform and warn academics about practices used by cybercriminals who seek to profit from unwary scholars and undermine the industry of science. This report describes the signs, symptoms, characteristics, and consequences of predatory publishing and related forms of consumer fraud. Methods to curb these cybercrimes include educating scholars and students about tactics used by predatory publishers; institutional changes in how faculty are evaluated using publications; soliciting cooperation from the industries that support academic publishing and indexing to curb incorporation of illegitimate journals; and taking an offensive position by reporting these consumer fraud crimes to the authorities. Over and above the problem of publishing good science in fraudulent journals, disseminating and citing poor-quality research threaten the credibility of science and of nursing.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Keywords:  cybercrime; open access; predatory publishers; research; scholarly publishing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29667312     DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Pract        ISSN: 1322-7114            Impact factor:   2.066


  5 in total

Review 1.  Predatory journals: a major threat in orthopaedic research.

Authors:  Markus Rupp; Lydia Anastasopoulou; Elke Wintermeyer; Deeksha Malhaan; Thaqif El Khassawna; Christian Heiss
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Editorial: Can Journals, as Trusted Intermediaries, Cut Through the Signal-to-Noise Problem in Medical Publishing?

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Is there a need for creators of imaginary authors to face legal consequences?

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 1.351

4.  A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers.

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva; Daniel J Dunleavy; Mina Moradzadeh; Joshua Eykens
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.238

5.  Canadian academics' use of predatory journals.

Authors:  Maureen Babb
Journal:  J Can Health Libr Assoc       Date:  2021-12-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.