| Literature DB >> 29667106 |
Mingchao Ma1,2, Marc Ongena2, Qingfeng Wang1, Dawei Guan1,3, Fengming Cao1,3, Xin Jiang4,5, Jun Li6,7.
Abstract
ArbusEntities:
Keywords: AMF; Black soil; Illumina MiSeq sequencing; Inorganic fertilizer; Manure
Year: 2018 PMID: 29667106 PMCID: PMC5904092 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-018-0587-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Soil properties and wheat yield in different fertilization regimes
| Treatment | pH | AP, g kg−1 | AK, g kg−1 | TN, g kg−1 | NH4+-N, mg kg−1 | NO3−-N, mg kg−1 | OM, g kg−1 | Yield, kg ha−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 6.81 ± 0.01 c | 10.36 ± 2.73 a | 127.22 ± 6.91 a | 1.41 ± 0.03 a | 15.87 ± 2.46 a | 0.93 ± 0.34 ab | 28.14 ± 0.28 a | 1546.4 ± 96.4 a |
| M | 6.84 ± 0.09 c | 20.28 ± 5.45 b | 143.74 ± 8.25 ab | 1.42 ± 0.05 ab | 13.08 ± 2.10 a | 1.04 ± 0.20 ab | 29.49 ± 0.35 b | 2927.9 ± 437.9 b |
| NPK | 6.07 ± 0.06 a | 76.08 ± 3.94 c | 148.40 ± 3.54 b | 1.52 ± 0.05 b | 15.70 ± 2.15 a | 0.50 ± 0.05 a | 29.25 ± 0.46 ab | 3938.3 ± 238.3 c |
| MNPK | 6.26 ± 0.06 b | 79.83 ± 3.64 c | 153.80 ± 10.22 b | 1.44 ± 0.02 ab | 13.97 ± 0.99 a | 1.15 ± 0.22 b | 28.48 ± 0.80 ab | 4104.9 ± 214.9 c |
Values are means ± standard deviations (n = 3). Values within the same column followed by different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) according to Tukey’s multiple comparison
Treatment: CK, no fertilizer; M, manure; NPK, chemical nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer; MNPK, chemical nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer plus manure
Soil properties: AP, available P; AK, available K; TN, total nitrogen; NH4+, ammonium nitrogen; NO3−-N, nitrate nitrogen; OM, organic matter
Numbers of observed operational taxonomic units, coverage, richness and diversity of soil in different fertilization regimes
| Treatment | Goods coverage (%) | Operational taxonomic units | Richness | Diversity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chao1 | PD whole tree | Shannon | |||
| CK | 99.93 ± 0.02 ab | 89.0 ± 1.0 c | 104.17 ± 4.56 b | 6.37 ± 0.04 b | 3.70 ± 0.23 ab |
| M | 99.91 ± 0.01 a | 78.3 ± 4.7 b | 98.20 ± 5.14 b | 5.81 ± 0.54 ab | 3.97 ± 0.20 b |
| NPK | 99.94 ± 0.01 b | 62.7 ± 5.0 a | 80.19 ± 12.43 a | 5.00 ± 0.62 a | 3.53 ± 0.18 a |
| MNPK | 99.91 ± 0.02 a | 71.7 ± 5.0 ab | 104.82 ± 8.85 b | 5.66 ± 0.26 ab | 3.81 ± 0.26 ab |
Values within the same column followed by different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) according to Tukey’s multiple comparison
Fig. 1Relative abundances of AMF at family level with significant differences among fertilization regimes. A Glomeraceae; B Claroideoglomeraceae; C Gigasporaceae. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of relative abundance between three replicate samples. Lowercases above columns indicate significant differences (P < 0.05, Tukey’s test)
Relative abundance of phylogenetic genera under different fertilization regimes
| Class | Order | Family | Genus | CK (%) | M (%) | NPK (%) | MNPK (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 31.56 ± 1.76 b | 27.17 ± 3.22 ab | 52.13 ± 2.66 c | 22.85 ± 2.83 a |
|
| 37.29 ± 2.72 d | 17.35 ± 2.13 c | 2.65 ± 1.23 a | 10.77 ± 0.95 b | |||
|
| 6.94 ± 0.93 a | 14.21 ± 0.97 c | 12.50 ± 1.43 bc | 11.26 ± 1.13 b | |||
|
| 1.70 ± 0.22 b | 2.80 ± 0.62 c | 0.77 ± 0.20 a | 1.79 ± 0.29 b | |||
|
|
| 13.10 ± 0.97 a | 30.17 ± 2.65 c | 23.07 ± 2.46 b | 38.09 ± 1.55 d | ||
|
|
|
| 3.13 ± 1.10 b | 0.21 ± 0.14 a | 0.05 ± 0.06 a | 0.26 ± 0.29 a |
Values within the same row followed by different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) according to Tukey’s multiple comparison
At least one group’s relative abundance is more than 1% of the total sequences
Treatment: CK, no fertilizer; M, manure; NPK, chemical nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer; MNPK, chemical nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer plus manure
Fig. 2PCoA of the pyrosequencing reads based on the weighted Fast UniFrac metric. The first three axes are drawn and the percent of variance explained by each axis is given. Treatment: (triangle) CK, no fertilizer; (circle) M, manure; (square) NPK, inorganic phosphorus, potassium and nitrogen fertilizer; (star) MNPK, inorganic P, K and N fertilizer plus manure
Fig. 3Redundancy analysis of soil AMF communities and soil properties. Soil factors indicated in red text include available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK), pH, soil concentration of NH4+ (NH4+), soil concentration of NO3− (NO3−), total nitrogen (TN) and organic matter (OM). Treatment: (triangle) CK, no fertilizer; (circle) M, manure; (square) NPK, inorganic phosphorus, potassium and nitrogen fertilizer; (cross) MNPK, inorganic P, K and N fertilizer plus manure