Literature DB >> 29666891

Should we assess repeatability of PET quantitative uptake measurements of each 18F-labelled tracer?

Eric Laffon1,2,3,4, Henri de Clermont5, Sébastien Buj5, Roger Marthan5,6,7.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29666891     DOI： 10.1007/s00259-018-4006-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN： 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Reply: Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Measures in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Dynamic Versus Test-Retest Design.

Authors:  Gerbrand Maria Kramer; Otto S Hoekstra; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Measures in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Dynamic Versus Test-Retest Design.

Authors:  Eric Laffon; Roger Marthan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  On the 18F-fluoride PET imaging quantification to predict 223Ra-dichloride treatment response.

Authors:  Eric Laffon; Henri de Clermont; Roger Marthan; Fredéric Paycha
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Repeatability of quantitative 18F-FLT uptake measurements in solid tumors: an individual patient data multi-center meta-analysis.

Authors:  G M Kramer; Y Liu; A J de Langen; E P Jansma; I Trigonis; M-C Asselin; A Jackson; L Kenny; E O Aboagye; O S Hoekstra; R Boellaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 9.236
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.